Suppr超能文献

亚洲低收入和中等收入国家癌症护理的患者体验:一项针对晚期癌症患者的横断面研究。

Patient experience with cancer care in low- and middle-income Asian countries: a cross-sectional study of patients with advanced cancer.

作者信息

Andres Ellie Bostwick, Poco Louisa, Balasubramanian Ishwarya, Chaudry Isha, Hapuarachchi Thushari, Bhatnagar Sushma, Joad Anjum Khan, Mariam Lubna, Rahman Rubayat, Manalo Maria Fidelis, Tuong Pham Nguyen, Palat Gayatri, Putranto Rudi, Shatri Hamzah, Zu Wah Wah Myint, Ozdemir Semra, Malhotra Chetna

机构信息

Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore.

National Cancer Institute Maharagama, Maharagama, Sri Lanka.

出版信息

BMJ Glob Health. 2025 Jul 7;10(7):e017153. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017153.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Despite the disproportionate burden of cancer morbidity and mortality in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), little is known about patients' care experiences in these settings. This study assesses which aspects of physician communication and care coordination most influence patients' overall experience with care, and factors associated with patient experience ratings, to inform quality improvement and improve cancer care experiences in LMICs.

METHODS

In a cross-sectional study of 1933 patients with advanced cancer recruited at 10 major public hospitals in seven LMICs in Asia, patients rated their experience with physician communication, care coordination and overall.

RESULTS

Physician communication mattered most in patients' assessment of overall experience with care. Patient use of traditional medicine was associated with poorer physician communication ratings (β: -1.38, 95% CI: -2.11 to 0.65), while outpatient care (0.91, 95% CI: 0.24 to 1.57) was associated with higher ratings. Patients who were unsure (-0.77, 95% CI: -1.43 to -0.10) of their cancer stage (relative to aware of late-stage), or indicated financial difficulty (sufficient money to cover their daily needs fairly well (-0.77, 95% CI: -1.50 to -0.04) or poorly (-1.20, 95% CI: -2.30 to -0.09) relative to very well) rated care coordination lower. Patient experience ratings differed by minority group status and cancer severity understanding. Respondents identifying as ethnic minorities who were unsure of their cancer stage rated physician communication significantly higher (1.64, 95% CI: 0.71 to 2.58) than non-minorities aware of their advanced cancer. Non-minorities unsure of their cancer stage rated care coordination significantly lower (-1.00, 95% CI: -1.64 to -0.36) than non-minority patients aware of their cancer stage.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides new understanding of care priorities among patients with advanced cancer in LMICs. Our findings highlight the importance patients attribute to physician communication and considerations for improving patient-centred communication to support equitable and culturally appropriate care. This study also underscores the need for future work navigating prognostic discussions in LMICs.

摘要

引言

尽管低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)的癌症发病率和死亡率负担过重,但对于这些地区患者的就医体验却知之甚少。本研究评估了医生沟通和护理协调的哪些方面对患者的整体就医体验影响最大,以及与患者体验评分相关的因素,以为质量改进提供参考并改善低收入和中等收入国家的癌症护理体验。

方法

在一项横断面研究中,对来自亚洲七个低收入和中等收入国家10家主要公立医院的1933例晚期癌症患者进行了调查,患者对他们与医生沟通、护理协调及整体体验进行了评分。

结果

在患者对整体就医体验的评估中,医生沟通最为重要。患者使用传统药物与较低的医生沟通评分相关(β:-1.38,95%置信区间:-2.11至0.65),而门诊护理则与较高评分相关(0.91,95%置信区间:0.24至1.57)。不确定自己癌症分期的患者(相对于知晓为晚期患者)(-0.77,95%置信区间:-1.43至-0.10),或表示有经济困难的患者(相对于经济状况很好的患者,有足够的钱较好地满足日常需求(-0.77,95%置信区间:-1.50至-0.04)或较差地满足日常需求(-1.20,95%置信区间:-2.30至-0.09))对护理协调的评分较低。患者体验评分因少数群体身份和对癌症严重程度的了解程度而异。自认为是少数群体且不确定自己癌症分期的受访者对医生沟通评分显著高于知晓自己患有晚期癌症的非少数群体(1.64,95%置信区间:0.71至2.58)。不确定自己癌症分期的非少数群体对护理协调评分显著低于知晓自己癌症分期的非少数群体患者(-1.00,95%置信区间:-1.64至-0.36)。

结论

本研究为低收入和中等收入国家晚期癌症患者的护理重点提供了新的认识。我们的研究结果突出了患者对医生沟通的重视,以及改善以患者为中心的沟通以支持公平和符合文化背景的护理的考量。本研究还强调了未来在低收入和中等收入国家开展预后讨论工作的必要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4800/12232462/1fd13974e3b2/bmjgh-10-7-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验