Bherer Louis, Vrinceanu Tudor, Dupuy Emma Gabrielle, Gayda Mathieu, Vincent Thomas, Magnan Pierre-Olivier, Mohammadi Hanieh, Gauthier Claudine, Gagnon Christine, Duchesne Simon, Erickson Kirk I, Gagnon Daniel, Lesage Frédéric, Lupien Sonia, Poirier Judes, Dubé Marie-Pierre, Thorin Éric, Juneau Martin, Breton Juliana, Belleville Sylvie, Ferland Guylaine, Gaudreau-Majeau Flavie, Blanchette Caroll-Ann, Vitali Paolo, Nigam Anil
Research Centre and Centre EPIC, Montreal Heart Institute, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Front Aging Neurosci. 2025 Jun 23;17:1605128. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2025.1605128. eCollection 2025.
Lifestyle factors like exercise and cognitive stimulation might help improve cognitive performance in older adults. However, studies investigating this, reported mixed results. Most of the data supporting the benefit of exercise comes from cross-sectional studies, cohort studies, or short intervention studies of 3-6 months with poorly designed control groups. Meta-analyses suggest that longer intervention studies of around 1 year are more likely to show cognitive improvements and changes in brain biomarkers. Moreover, the type and content and optimal dose of the training program that best predict improvement in cognition is still poorly understood. Latest studies suggest that combining cognitive training with exercise training might have an added benefit. Moreover, functional and structural cerebral mechanisms involved are still poorly documented. Finally, few studies have systematically investigated the potential impact that cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF) progression might have on training neurocognitive outcomes.
159 seniors over the age of 60 with CVRF and no contraindications to exercise will be assigned to one of the three 1-year training programs: (1) Physical exercise intervention (aerobic and resistance exercises); (2) Multidomain intervention (combined cognitive training with aerobic and resistance exercises); or (3) Active control (stretching and toning exercises). All interventions take place 3 times a week, are supervised and individualized to each participant's profile. Assessments will be administered before, half-way and after the intervention: cognition (primary outcome), cerebral imaging with a focus on cerebrovascular mechanisms (secondary outcomes), and exploratory outcomes (genetic profile, chronic stress biomarkers, metabolic function, inflammation markers, mood, sleep, and diet).
The present design uses a 12-month intervention period to maximize the likelihood of identifying the cerebrovascular markers involved in exercise training effects on cognitive performance in individuals with CVRF. Moreover, we measure a series of exploratory outcomes that could also play a role in modulating the effect of the multidomain training on cognition. This will allow an investigation of their potential mediating role on the primary outcomes.
[https://clinicaltrials.gov/] identifier [NCT04962061].
运动和认知刺激等生活方式因素可能有助于改善老年人的认知表现。然而,对此进行调查的研究结果不一。大多数支持运动有益的数据来自横断面研究、队列研究或为期3至6个月且对照组设计不佳的短期干预研究。荟萃分析表明,为期约1年的较长干预研究更有可能显示出认知改善和脑生物标志物的变化。此外,最能预测认知改善的训练计划的类型、内容和最佳剂量仍知之甚少。最新研究表明,将认知训练与运动训练相结合可能会带来额外益处。此外,所涉及的功能性和结构性脑机制仍记录不足。最后,很少有研究系统地调查心血管危险因素(CVRF)进展可能对训练神经认知结果产生的潜在影响。
159名60岁以上患有CVRF且无运动禁忌症的老年人将被分配到三个为期1年的训练计划之一:(1)体育锻炼干预(有氧运动和阻力运动);(2)多领域干预(认知训练与有氧运动和阻力运动相结合);或(3)积极对照(伸展和塑形运动)。所有干预每周进行3次,由专人监督并根据每个参与者的情况进行个性化安排。在干预前、干预中期和干预后进行评估:认知(主要结果)、侧重于脑血管机制的脑成像(次要结果)和探索性结果(基因图谱、慢性应激生物标志物、代谢功能、炎症标志物、情绪、睡眠和饮食)。
本设计采用12个月的干预期,以最大限度地提高识别参与运动训练对患有CVRF个体认知表现影响的脑血管标志物的可能性。此外,我们测量了一系列探索性结果,这些结果也可能在调节多领域训练对认知的影响中发挥作用。这将有助于研究它们在主要结果上的潜在中介作用。