Deng Qin, Yu Guizhen, Lai Lijian, Xu Jiayin, Zheng Yuemei
Obstetrics, Dongguan Eighth People's Hospital, Dongguan, CHN.
Obstetrics, Dongguan Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Dongguan, CHN.
Cureus. 2025 Jun 5;17(6):e85433. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85433. eCollection 2025 Jun.
Premature rupture of membranes (PROM) precedes 8‑10% of births and remains a leading cause of neonatal morbidity. Although infection, prior obstetric history, and cervical pathology are recognized contributors, data on the relative influence of maternal age, parity, mode of delivery, and seasonality are inconsistent across regions. Clarifying these determinants could enhance antenatal risk stratification and guide preventive counselling.
We retrospectively reviewed all singleton deliveries recorded in a tertiary care obstetric database from January 2018 through December 2020. Maternal age was grouped as <20, 20‑24, 25‑29, 30‑34, and ≥35 years; parity was dichotomized (primipara vs. multipart). The final mode of delivery (vaginal vs. cesarean) and calendar month of birth were extracted. Incidence of PROM was compared among age groups by the Kruskal-Wallis test, between parity and delivery‑mode strata by χ² tests, and across months by the Friedman test; Holm-Bonferroni corrections addressed multiple comparisons.
Across the three‑year period, PROM complicated 13.7% of deliveries. Incidence varied significantly by age (H = 19.95; p = 0.00051), peaking in women aged 25‑29 and lowest in those ≥35. Primiparas showed markedly higher PROM rates than multiparas each year (2018: 29.8% vs. 3.9%; 2019: 22.9% vs. 7.3%; 2020: 23.3% vs. 6.2%; all p < 0.0001). PROM was likewise more frequent in pregnancies that ultimately required cesarean section (17.5‑20.2%) than in vaginal births (9.3‑11.1%) during each study year (all p < 0.0001). No significant month‑to‑month or seasonal trend was detected (χ² = 0.50; p = 0.779).
In this temperate‑climate cohort, PROM clustered in younger, first‑pregnancy mothers and was strongly associated with subsequent cesarean delivery, while advanced maternal age and seasonality exerted minimal influence. These findings highlight nulliparous women in the 20-29-year age group as a key population for targeted education, intensified surveillance, and early labor management planning. Future prospective studies should explore the biological mechanisms underlying the age‑parity interaction and evaluate interventions, such as infection screening or cervical support, that may mitigate PROM risk in this high‑incidence group.
胎膜早破(PROM)发生在8%-10%的分娩中,仍是新生儿发病的主要原因。虽然感染、既往产科病史和宫颈病变是公认的影响因素,但关于产妇年龄、产次、分娩方式和季节性的相对影响的数据在不同地区并不一致。明确这些决定因素可以加强产前风险分层并指导预防性咨询。
我们回顾性分析了2018年1月至2020年12月在一家三级护理产科数据库中记录的所有单胎分娩。产妇年龄分为<20岁、20-24岁、25-29岁、30-34岁和≥35岁;产次分为两类(初产妇与经产妇)。提取最终分娩方式(阴道分娩与剖宫产)和出生月份。通过Kruskal-Wallis检验比较各年龄组的胎膜早破发生率,通过χ²检验比较产次和分娩方式分层之间的发生率,通过Friedman检验比较各月份的发生率;Holm-Bonferroni校正用于处理多重比较。
在三年期间,胎膜早破使13.7%的分娩复杂化。发生率因年龄有显著差异(H=19.95;p=0.00051),在25-29岁的女性中达到峰值,在≥35岁的女性中最低。每年初产妇的胎膜早破率明显高于经产妇(2018年:29.8%对3.9%;2019年:22.9%对7.3%;2020年:23.3%对6.2%;所有p<0.0