• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

澳大利亚的预制餐食能助力食品素养及健康家庭膳食供应吗?一项定性研究。

Can Australian meal kits support food literacy and healthy family meal provisioning? A qualitative study.

作者信息

Fraser Kylie, Love Penelope, Campbell Karen J, Spence Alison

机构信息

Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise & Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, 75 Pigdons Road, Waurn Ponds, Djilang Geelong, Victoria 3216, Australia.

出版信息

Health Promot Int. 2025 Jul 1;40(4). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daaf105.

DOI:10.1093/heapro/daaf105
PMID:40626461
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12235520/
Abstract

Cooking at home is a key recommendation to improve family nutrition. However, parents of young children face barriers to preparing healthy meals. Commercial meal kit subscription services (MKSSs) may support parents to overcome challenges and influence food literacy. This study explored how parents of young children (2-5 years) use MKSSs, examining how food literacy is supported and can be strengthened to promote healthy family meal provisioning. Twenty-five primary meal providers were recruited via social media (e.g. Facebook) for semi-structured interviews over phone or Zoom. Interviews were conducted with participants who had recently purchased meal kits from Australian MKSSs. Transcripts were analysed using inductive thematic analysis followed by deductive mapping to a food literacy framework consisting of four domains (plan and manage, select, prepare, and eat). Three themes captured participants' meal kit use: (i) managing the complexities of feeding a family with young children, (ii) shifting the mental load, and (iii) broadening culinary horizons for all. Mapping of each theme to the four food literacy domains highlighted that meal kits primarily supported the 'plan and manage' and 'prepare' domains of family meal provisioning by alleviating pressures in the feeding of young children. The 'select' and 'eat' domains were less supported. These findings suggest while meal kits may support aspects of food literacy, further guidance on selecting nutritious meals, modifying recipes, involving children, and fostering mealtime practices could strengthen their impact on healthy family meal provisioning. Further research is needed to explore how meal kits could be leveraged to improve parental food literacy and family nutrition.

摘要

在家做饭是改善家庭营养的一项关键建议。然而,幼儿的父母在准备健康餐食时面临诸多障碍。商业餐食配送服务套餐订阅服务(MKSSs)或许能帮助父母克服这些挑战,并影响食物素养。本研究探讨了幼儿(2至5岁)的父母如何使用MKSSs,考察了食物素养是如何得到支持以及如何能够得到强化以促进健康的家庭餐食供应。通过社交媒体(如脸书)招募了25位主要餐食供应商,通过电话或Zoom进行半结构化访谈。对那些最近从澳大利亚MKSSs购买过餐食配送服务套餐的参与者进行了访谈。使用归纳主题分析法对访谈记录进行分析,随后将其演绎映射到一个由四个领域(计划与管理、选择、准备和饮食)组成的食物素养框架中。三个主题概括了参与者对餐食配送服务套餐的使用情况:(i)应对喂养幼儿家庭的复杂性,(ii)减轻心理负担,以及(iii)拓宽所有人的烹饪视野。将每个主题映射到四个食物素养领域表明,餐食配送服务套餐主要通过减轻喂养幼儿的压力来支持家庭餐食供应的“计划与管理”和“准备”领域。“选择”和“饮食”领域得到的支持较少。这些发现表明,虽然餐食配送服务套餐可能会支持食物素养的某些方面,但在选择营养膳食、修改食谱、让孩子参与以及培养用餐习惯方面提供进一步指导,可能会增强它们对健康家庭餐食供应的影响。需要进一步研究来探索如何利用餐食配送服务套餐来提高父母的食物素养和家庭营养。

相似文献

1
Can Australian meal kits support food literacy and healthy family meal provisioning? A qualitative study.澳大利亚的预制餐食能助力食品素养及健康家庭膳食供应吗?一项定性研究。
Health Promot Int. 2025 Jul 1;40(4). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daaf105.
2
"The big win was that we actually cooked"- a qualitative interview study about the parental experience of Family Meals on Prescription for children living with obesity.“最大的收获是我们真的做饭了”——一项关于为肥胖儿童开具家庭用餐处方的家长体验的定性访谈研究。
J Health Popul Nutr. 2025 May 24;44(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s41043-025-00921-3.
3
The risks, benefits, and resource implications of different diets in gastrostomy-fed children: The YourTube mixed method study.胃造口喂养儿童不同饮食的风险、益处及资源影响:YouTube混合方法研究
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul;29(25):1-21. doi: 10.3310/RRREF7741.
4
Gender differences in the context of interventions for improving health literacy in migrants: a qualitative evidence synthesis.移民健康素养提升干预措施背景下的性别差异:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 12;12(12):CD013302. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013302.pub2.
5
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.在自闭症群体的参与下为成年自闭症患者调整安全计划。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.
6
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
7
Factors that influence parents' and informal caregivers' views and practices regarding routine childhood vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响父母和非正式照顾者对常规儿童疫苗接种看法和做法的因素:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 27;10(10):CD013265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013265.pub2.
8
Can We Enhance Shared Decision-making for Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery? A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences.我们能否加强髋臼周围截骨术的共同决策?一项关于患者体验的定性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):120-136. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003198. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
9
"A System That Wasn't Really Optimized for Me": Factors Influencing Autistic University Students' Access to Information.“一个并非真正为我优化的系统”:影响自闭症大学生获取信息的因素
Autism Adulthood. 2025 Apr 3;7(2):171-184. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0139. eCollection 2025 Apr.
10
Parents' and informal caregivers' views and experiences of communication about routine childhood vaccination: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.父母及非正式照料者关于儿童常规疫苗接种沟通的观点与经历:定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 7;2(2):CD011787. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011787.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Meal kit delivery services in the UK: An evaluation of the nutritional composition of meals.英国的餐盒配送服务:对餐食营养成分的评估。
Nutrition. 2024 Dec;128:112538. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2024.112538. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
2
A critical review of the reporting of reflexive thematic analysis in Health Promotion International.对《健康促进国际》中反思性主题分析报告的批判性回顾。
Health Promot Int. 2024 Jun 1;39(3). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daae049.
3
Ultra-processed foods and human health: An umbrella review and updated meta-analyses of observational evidence.超加工食品与人类健康:综述和更新的观察性证据的荟萃分析。
Clin Nutr. 2024 Jun;43(6):1386-1394. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2024.04.016. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
4
Supporting best practice in reflexive thematic analysis reporting in : A review of published research and introduction to the (RTARG).支持反思性主题分析报告的最佳实践:已发表研究的回顾及 (RTARG)介绍。
Palliat Med. 2024 Jun;38(6):608-616. doi: 10.1177/02692163241234800. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
5
Home-delivered meal boxes in a family setting: a qualitative study investigating reasons for use and perceived impact on meal practices.家庭送餐盒:一项定性研究,调查使用原因和对膳食实践的感知影响。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jan 23;24(1):277. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-17729-1.
6
Mapping the behaviour change potential of meal kits to positively influence parental food literacy.挖掘预制餐包的行为改变潜力,以积极影响家长的食品素养。
Public Health Nutr. 2023 Dec 1;27(1):e16. doi: 10.1017/S136898002300263X.
7
Meal kit subscription services and opportunities to improve family vegetable consumption.膳食套餐订阅服务与增加家庭蔬菜消费的机会
Health Promot Int. 2023 Dec 1;38(6). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daad155.
8
The contribution of Australian fathers in getting food on the table among families with young children.澳大利亚父亲在有幼儿的家庭中为获得食物所做的贡献。
Public Health Nutr. 2023 Dec;26(12):2826-2835. doi: 10.1017/S1368980023001817. Epub 2023 Aug 25.
9
Development of food literacy in children and adolescents: implications for the design of strategies to promote healthier and more sustainable diets.儿童和青少年食品素养的发展:对促进更健康、更可持续饮食的策略设计的启示
Nutr Rev. 2024 Mar 11;82(4):536-552. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuad072.
10
What's in a commercial meal kit? Structured review of Australian meal kits.商业餐盒里有什么?澳大利亚餐盒的结构化综述。
Public Health Nutr. 2023 Jun;26(6):1284-1292. doi: 10.1017/S1368980023000265. Epub 2023 Feb 9.