Hlynsson Jón Ingi, Kristjánsson Tómas, Andersson Gerhard, Carlbring Per
Department of Psychology, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland.
Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Front Psychol. 2025 Jun 24;16:1568141. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1568141. eCollection 2025.
Major depression is a highly prevalent and heterogenous mental disorder. Although therapeutic advances for major depressive disorder over the past quarter-century have been incremental rather than transformative, booster sessions have been proposed as a means of solidifying acute treatment gains and lowering relapse risk. However, evidence for the effectiveness of these treatment booster sessions remains inconclusive. This study therefore evaluated the long-term effectiveness of relapse prevention treatment booster sessions for major depression.
In a two-arm, parallel-group, maintenance-phase randomized controlled trial (RCT) with repeated longitudinal measures, the sample consisted of participants in Sweden who had received acute treatment for depression (internet-based behavioral activation or physical activity) and were then randomly assigned to either an 8-week relapse prevention program ( = 119) or control group ( = 143). Participants were followed-up for 24-months with both monthly self-report questionnaires (Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item & Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item) and quarterly diagnostic interviews (Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview; MINI).
Both the relapse prevention group and control group exhibited similar depression-free trends over the course of the study period, with over 95% of participants in each group maintaining remission at the 24-month follow-up. Furthermore, all pre-hypothesized predictors of relapse were non-significant in differentiating the two groups at 24-month follow-up.
These findings raise the question of whether treatment booster sessions are uniformly advisable for all mild-moderate cases of depression. For instance, preferentially recommending treatment boosters for psychotherapy-naïve individuals with depression may yield greater effects compared to individuals with difficult-to-treat depression. Our findings indicate that the efficacy of behavioral activation and physical activity may be even greater than previously reported, a testament to the lasting effects of internet-based psychotherapy.
ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT01619930.
重度抑郁症是一种高度普遍且异质性的精神障碍。尽管在过去四分之一个世纪里,重度抑郁症的治疗进展是渐进式而非变革性的,但强化治疗被提议作为巩固急性治疗效果和降低复发风险的一种手段。然而,这些治疗强化疗程有效性的证据仍不确凿。因此,本研究评估了重度抑郁症复发预防治疗强化疗程的长期有效性。
在一项双臂、平行组、维持期随机对照试验(RCT)中,采用重复纵向测量,样本包括瑞典接受过抑郁症急性治疗(基于互联网的行为激活或体育活动)的参与者,然后将他们随机分配到一个为期8周的复发预防项目组(n = 119)或对照组(n = 143)。通过每月的自我报告问卷(患者健康问卷9项版和广泛性焦虑症7项版)以及每季度的诊断访谈(迷你国际神经精神病学访谈;MINI)对参与者进行为期24个月的随访。
在研究期间,复发预防组和对照组均呈现出相似的无抑郁趋势,每组超过95%的参与者在24个月随访时维持缓解状态。此外,所有预先假设的复发预测因素在24个月随访时区分两组时均无统计学意义。
这些发现提出了一个问题,即治疗强化疗程是否对所有轻度至中度抑郁症病例都一律适用。例如,与难治性抑郁症患者相比,优先为未接受过心理治疗的抑郁症患者推荐治疗强化疗程可能会产生更大的效果。我们的研究结果表明,行为激活和体育活动的疗效可能比之前报道的更大,这证明了基于互联网的心理治疗的持久效果。
ClinicalTrials.gov,标识符NCT01619930。