Suppr超能文献

含咖啡因口香糖对进行抗阻训练的男性产生的力量和功率提升效果与胶囊相当,且副作用更少。

Caffeinated chewing gum produces comparable strength and power gains to capsules with fewer side effects in resistance-trained men.

作者信息

Ding Li, Liu Jue, Ma Yixuan, Bai Litian, Guo Li, Chen Bin, Cao Yinhang, Girard Olivier

机构信息

Shanghai University of Sport, Key Laboratory of Exercise and Health Sciences (Ministry of Education)School of Athletic Performance, Shanghai, China.

Shanghai University of Sport, School of Athletic Performance, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2025 Dec;22(1):2531173. doi: 10.1080/15502783.2025.2531173. Epub 2025 Jul 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Caffeine, widely used as an ergogenic aid, has been extensively studied regarding its dosage and timing of ingestion. However, the impact of different administration methods on caffeine's performance-enhancing effects remains relatively underexplored. This study compared the effects of caffeine administered via chewing gum versus capsules on maximal strength, muscular power, and side effects during bench press and back squat exercises.

METHODS

Sixteen resistance-trained males participated in a double-blind, randomized trial, ingesting either a 4 mg/kg caffeine capsule (CC) or placebo capsule (PC) one hour before testing, or a 4 mg/kg caffeinated gum (CG) (4 mg/kg) or placebo gum (PG) five minutes prior. Assessments including one-repetition maximum (1RM) and muscular power at 25%, 50%, 75%, and 90%1RM for bench press and back squat.

RESULTS

Caffeine increased 1RM (+2.1-5.0%) and muscular power (+6.1-20.0%) in both the bench press and back squat compared to placebo (all  < 0.05). However, no significant differences were observed between CC and CG for maximal strength or muscular power (all  > 0.05). Furthermore, CG was associated with fewer reports of gastrointestinal discomfort (12.5% vs. 37.5%) immediately post-exercise and tachycardia/heart palpitations (0% vs. 25.0%) at 24 hours compared to CC (all  < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Caffeinated gum (4 mg/kg) produced ergogenic effects comparable to capsules in enhancing maximal strength and muscular power during bench press and back squat exercises, with fewer side effects in resistance-trained men.

摘要

背景

咖啡因作为一种提高体能的辅助剂被广泛使用,人们对其摄入剂量和时间进行了广泛研究。然而,不同给药方式对咖啡因增强体能效果的影响仍相对未被充分探索。本研究比较了通过口香糖与胶囊摄入咖啡因对卧推和深蹲练习中最大力量、肌肉力量以及副作用的影响。

方法

16名有阻力训练经验的男性参与了一项双盲随机试验,在测试前1小时摄入4毫克/千克咖啡因胶囊(CC)或安慰剂胶囊(PC),或在测试前5分钟摄入4毫克/千克含咖啡因口香糖(CG)或安慰剂口香糖(PG)。评估包括卧推和深蹲的一次重复最大值(1RM)以及在1RM的25%、50%、75%和90%时的肌肉力量。

结果

与安慰剂相比,咖啡因使卧推和深蹲的1RM(增加2.1%-5.0%)和肌肉力量(增加6.1%-20.0%)均有所提高(所有P值均<0.05)。然而,在最大力量或肌肉力量方面,CC和CG之间未观察到显著差异(所有P值均>0.05)。此外,与CC相比,CG在运动后立即出现胃肠道不适的报告较少(12.5%对37.5%),在24小时时出现心动过速/心悸的报告较少(0%对25.0%)(所有P值均<0.05)。

结论

含咖啡因口香糖(4毫克/千克)在增强卧推和深蹲练习中的最大力量和肌肉力量方面产生了与胶囊相当的提高体能效果,且在有阻力训练的男性中副作用较少。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验