• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医生沟通中的细微差异对患者关于低价值医疗决策的重大影响:一项实验性 vignette 研究

Subtle Differences in Physician Communication and Substantial Impacts on Patient Decision-Making About Low-Value Care: An Experimental Vignette Study.

作者信息

Park Ji Sun, Lee Ji-Su, Do Young Kyung

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Management, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Jongno-gu, South Korea.

Graduate School of Data Science, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, South Korea.

出版信息

J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Aug;31(5):e70208. doi: 10.1111/jep.70208.

DOI:10.1111/jep.70208
PMID:40631913
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12239706/
Abstract

RATIONAL, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: While low-value care may have multiple contributing factors, it ultimately arises within patient-physician interactions, often influenced by communication. This study examines whether and the extent to which physician communication factors influence patients' willingness to undergo low-value care using hypothetical vignettes in South Korea.

METHODS

We utilised data from a total of 1229 South Korean adults that included hypothetical vignettes on low-value care. Participants were presented with vignettes involving minor head injury and the potential use of computed tomography (CT). We assessed changes in the proportion of individuals willing to undergo low-value CT based on three physician communication factors: explicit recommendation, communication regarding test benefits and risks, and expressions indicative of defensive medicine, such as warning about missed problems and stating no legal responsibility. We also examined participant characteristics associated with their willingness to use low-value CT.

RESULTS

Decisions regarding low-value care were significantly influenced by physician communication factors. For instance, while 68.5% of participants were willing to use low-value CT without explicit recommendation, 76.6% were willing when an explicit recommendation was made. Among those initially willing to use low-value CT without an explicit recommendation, 54.6% changed their decision and chose not to undergo the CT when presented with information on the risks and benefits. However, 69% of these individuals reversed their decision and opted for the CT when the vignette included elements indicative of defensive medicine. The willingness to use low-value care was not associated with most participant characteristics, except for supplementary private health insurance and individual preferences for health care.

CONCLUSIONS

Physician communication plays a pivotal role in patient decision-making regarding low-value care. To reduce low-value care, improving physician communication should be prioritised and considered a crucial leverage point in quality improvement initiatives.

摘要

原理、目的和目标:虽然低价值医疗可能有多种促成因素,但它最终产生于医患互动中,且常常受到沟通的影响。本研究使用韩国的假设性情景案例,考察医生的沟通因素是否以及在多大程度上影响患者接受低价值医疗的意愿。

方法

我们利用了总共1229名韩国成年人的数据,其中包括关于低价值医疗的假设性情景案例。向参与者展示了涉及轻度头部损伤以及计算机断层扫描(CT)潜在使用的情景案例。我们根据三个医生沟通因素评估愿意接受低价值CT检查的个体比例的变化:明确推荐、关于检查益处和风险的沟通,以及表明防御性医疗的表述,如警告漏诊问题和声明无法律责任。我们还研究了与他们愿意使用低价值CT相关的参与者特征。

结果

关于低价值医疗的决策受到医生沟通因素的显著影响。例如,在没有明确推荐的情况下,68.5%的参与者愿意使用低价值CT,而在有明确推荐时,这一比例为76.6%。在那些最初愿意在没有明确推荐的情况下使用低价值CT的人中,当提供有关风险和益处的信息时,54.6%的人改变了决定,选择不进行CT检查。然而,当情景案例包含表明防御性医疗的要素时,这些人中69%的人又改变了决定,选择进行CT检查。除了补充性私人医疗保险和个人对医疗保健的偏好外,愿意接受低价值医疗与大多数参与者特征无关。

结论

医生沟通在患者关于低价值医疗的决策中起着关键作用。为了减少低价值医疗,应优先改善医生沟通,并将其视为质量改进举措中的一个关键杠杆点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/196b/12239706/90ba4896104c/JEP-31-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/196b/12239706/5dddf68f10ba/JEP-31-0-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/196b/12239706/90ba4896104c/JEP-31-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/196b/12239706/5dddf68f10ba/JEP-31-0-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/196b/12239706/90ba4896104c/JEP-31-0-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Subtle Differences in Physician Communication and Substantial Impacts on Patient Decision-Making About Low-Value Care: An Experimental Vignette Study.医生沟通中的细微差异对患者关于低价值医疗决策的重大影响:一项实验性 vignette 研究
J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Aug;31(5):e70208. doi: 10.1111/jep.70208.
2
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
3
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.干预健康从业者与受影响者之间关于临终关怀的人际沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.
4
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
5
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
6
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临医疗治疗或筛查决策的人们提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Oct 5(10):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub3.
7
Can We Enhance Shared Decision-making for Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery? A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences.我们能否加强髋臼周围截骨术的共同决策?一项关于患者体验的定性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):120-136. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003198. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
8
Shared decision-making for people with asthma.哮喘患者的共同决策
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 3;10(10):CD012330. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012330.pub2.
9
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
10
Parents' and informal caregivers' views and experiences of communication about routine childhood vaccination: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.父母及非正式照料者关于儿童常规疫苗接种沟通的观点与经历:定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 7;2(2):CD011787. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011787.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
We Need to Talk About Low-Value Care.我们需要谈谈低价值医疗。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Nov 1;6(11):e2342445. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.42445.
2
Effects of private health insurance on medical expenditure and health service utilization in South Korea: a quantile regression analysis.韩国私人医疗保险对医疗支出和卫生服务利用的影响:分位数回归分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Nov 7;23(1):1219. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10251-x.
3
Exploring patients' perceptions of low-value care: An interview study.探讨患者对低价值医疗的认知:一项访谈研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2023 Jun;111:107687. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107687. Epub 2023 Mar 5.
4
Low-Value Care: Convergence and Challenges Comment on "Key Factors That Promote Low-Value Care: Views From Experts From the United States, Canada, and the Netherlands".低价值医疗:趋同与挑战 对《促进低价值医疗的关键因素:来自美国、加拿大和荷兰专家的观点》的评论
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Dec 6;11(11):2762-2764. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.7017.
5
Comparison of Low-Value Care Among Commercial and Medicaid Enrollees.商业保险参保者与医疗补助参保者的低价值医疗服务比较。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Mar;38(4):954-960. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07823-8. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
6
Assessing patient, physician, and practice characteristics predicting the use of low-value services.评估患者、医生和实践特征,预测低价值服务的使用。
Health Serv Res. 2022 Dec;57(6):1261-1273. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14053. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
7
Understanding low-value care and associated de-implementation processes: a qualitative study of Choosing Wisely Interventions across Canadian hospitals.理解低价值医疗保健及相关的去执行过程:加拿大医院选择明智干预措施的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jan 21;22(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07485-6.
8
Views of healthcare consumer representatives on defensive practice: 'We are your biggest advocate and supporter… not the enemy'.医疗保健消费者代表对防御性医疗实践的看法:“我们是你们最大的拥护者和支持者……而不是敌人”。
Health Expect. 2022 Feb;25(1):374-383. doi: 10.1111/hex.13395. Epub 2021 Dec 3.
9
Using Tailored Messages to Target Overuse of Low-Value Breast Cancer Care in Older Women.使用定制信息来针对老年女性过度使用低价值乳腺癌护理。
J Surg Res. 2022 Feb;270:503-512. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.10.005. Epub 2021 Nov 19.
10
The use of experimental vignette studies to identify drivers of variations in the delivery of health care: a scoping review.使用实验案例研究来确定医疗保健提供差异的驱动因素:范围综述。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Apr 22;21(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01247-4.