Ingvarsson Sara, Nilsen Per, Hasson Henna
Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Health, Medical and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Dec 6;11(11):2762-2764. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.7017.
Interest has increased in the topic of de-implementation, ie, reducing so-called low-value care (LVC). The article "Key Factors That Promote Low-Value Care: Views From Experts From the United States, Canada, and the Netherlands" by Verkerk and colleagues identifies national-level factors affecting LVC use in those three countries. This commentary raises three critical points regarding the study. First, the study does not clearly define the national level. Secondly, national-level factors might not be relevant for all types of LVCs and thirdly, the study's rather limited sample makes it difficult to draw firm conclusions. We also include some critical comments related to some of the study's findings in relation to results of our recently published scoping review of the international literature on de-implementation and use of LVC and an interview study with primary care physicians on LVC use. Finally, we provide some suggestions for further research that we believe is needed to improve understanding of LVC use and facilitate its de-implementation.
对去实施(即减少所谓的低价值医疗(LVC))这一话题的兴趣与日俱增。韦尔克及其同事所著的《促进低价值医疗的关键因素:来自美国、加拿大和荷兰专家的观点》一文,确定了影响这三个国家低价值医疗使用情况的国家级因素。本评论针对该研究提出了三个关键点。第一,该研究未明确界定国家级层面。第二,国家级因素可能并非适用于所有类型的低价值医疗。第三,该研究样本相当有限,难以得出确凿结论。我们还纳入了一些与该研究的某些发现相关的批判性评论,这些发现与我们最近发表的关于去实施和低价值医疗使用的国际文献的范围综述结果,以及一项针对基层医疗医生低价值医疗使用情况的访谈研究有关。最后,我们提供了一些进一步研究的建议,我们认为这些研究对于增进对低价值医疗使用情况的理解以及推动其去实施是必要的。