• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Low-Value Care: Convergence and Challenges Comment on "Key Factors That Promote Low-Value Care: Views From Experts From the United States, Canada, and the Netherlands".低价值医疗:趋同与挑战 对《促进低价值医疗的关键因素:来自美国、加拿大和荷兰专家的观点》的评论
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Dec 6;11(11):2762-2764. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.7017.
2
Context, Culture, and the Complexity of De-Implementing Low-Value Care Comment on "Key Factors that Promote Low-Value Care: Views of Experts From the United States, Canada, and the Netherlands".背景、文化与低价值医疗照护实施复杂性评论:“促进低价值医疗照护的关键因素:来自美国、加拿大和荷兰专家的观点”
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Aug 1;11(8):1592-1594. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.6968. Epub 2022 Feb 9.
3
Key Factors that Promote Low-Value Care: Views of Experts From the United States, Canada, and the Netherlands.促进低价值医疗保健的关键因素:来自美国、加拿大和荷兰专家的观点。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Aug 1;11(8):1514-1521. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.53. Epub 2021 Jun 19.
4
Reducing Low-Value Care: Uncertainty as Crucial Cross-Cutting Theme Comment on "Key Factors That Promote Low-Value Care: Views of Experts From the United States, Canada, and the Netherlands".减少低价值医疗:不确定性作为关键跨领域主题述评“促进低价值医疗的关键因素:来自美国、加拿大和荷兰专家的观点”。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Sep 1;11(9):1964-1966. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.7027. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
5
Understanding low-value care and associated de-implementation processes: a qualitative study of Choosing Wisely Interventions across Canadian hospitals.理解低价值医疗保健及相关的去执行过程:加拿大医院选择明智干预措施的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jan 21;22(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07485-6.
6
Tools to Reduce Low-Value Care: Lessons From COVID-19 Pandemic Comment on "Key Factors that Promote Low-Value Care: Views of Experts From the United States, Canada, and the Netherlands".减少低价值医疗的工具:新冠疫情带来的启示 述评:“促进低价值医疗的关键因素:来自美国、加拿大和荷兰专家的观点”。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Sep 1;11(9):1967-1970. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.6887. Epub 2022 Apr 12.
7
Overview of the Drivers of Low-Value Care Comment on "Key Factors that Promote Low-Value Care: Views of Experts From the United States, Canada, and the Netherlands".低价值医疗的驱动因素概述 述评“促进低价值医疗的关键因素:来自美国、加拿大和荷兰专家的观点”。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Aug 1;11(8):1595-1598. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.6833. Epub 2022 Feb 14.
8
National governance of de-implementation of low-value care: a qualitative study in Sweden.国家治理低价值医疗服务的去执行化:瑞典的一项定性研究。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Sep 1;20(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00895-2.
9
Beyond Microsystem Fixes: Targeting National Drivers of Low-Value Care Comment on "Key Factors that Promote Low-Value Care: Views of Experts From the United States, Canada, and the Netherlands".超越微系统修复:瞄准低价值医疗的国家驱动因素 述评“促进低价值医疗的关键因素:来自美国、加拿大和荷兰专家的观点”。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Sep 1;11(9):1971-1973. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.7077. Epub 2022 Aug 6.
10
Does de-implementation of low-value care impact the patient-clinician relationship? A mixed methods study.低价值医疗的废除是否会影响医患关系?一项混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jan 6;22(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07345-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Subtle Differences in Physician Communication and Substantial Impacts on Patient Decision-Making About Low-Value Care: An Experimental Vignette Study.医生沟通中的细微差异对患者关于低价值医疗决策的重大影响:一项实验性 vignette 研究
J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Aug;31(5):e70208. doi: 10.1111/jep.70208.
2
Factors associated with patients' demand for low-value care: a scoping review.与患者低价值医疗需求相关的因素:一项范围综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec 28;24(1):1656. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12093-7.
3
Challenges and Opportunities for Reducing Low-Value Care; A Response to Recent Commentaries.减少低价值医疗的挑战与机遇;对近期评论的回应。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7954. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7954. Epub 2023 Mar 5.

本文引用的文献

1
National governance of de-implementation of low-value care: a qualitative study in Sweden.国家治理低价值医疗服务的去执行化:瑞典的一项定性研究。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Sep 1;20(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00895-2.
2
Key Factors that Promote Low-Value Care: Views of Experts From the United States, Canada, and the Netherlands.促进低价值医疗保健的关键因素:来自美国、加拿大和荷兰专家的观点。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Aug 1;11(8):1514-1521. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.53. Epub 2021 Jun 19.
3
Determinants for the use and de-implementation of low-value care in health care: a scoping review.医疗保健中低价值医疗使用与停用的决定因素:一项范围综述
Implement Sci Commun. 2021 Feb 4;2(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s43058-021-00110-3.
4
Why do they do it? A grounded theory study of the use of low-value care among primary health care physicians.他们为什么这样做?一项关于初级保健医生使用低价值医疗服务的扎根理论研究。
Implement Sci. 2020 Oct 21;15(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-01052-5.
5
Patient, Provider, and Practice Characteristics Associated with Inappropriate Antimicrobial Prescribing in Ambulatory Practices.患者、医疗服务提供者和医疗实践特征与门诊实践中不适当的抗菌药物处方有关。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2018 Mar;39(3):307-315. doi: 10.1017/ice.2017.263. Epub 2018 Jan 30.
6
Medical overuse and quaternary prevention in primary care - A qualitative study with general practitioners.基层医疗中的医疗过度使用与四级预防——一项针对全科医生的定性研究
BMC Fam Pract. 2017 Dec 8;18(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12875-017-0667-4.
7
How do Swiss general practitioners agree with and report adhering to a top-five list of unnecessary tests and treatments? Results of a cross-sectional survey.瑞士全科医生如何认同并报告遵守五项不必要的检查和治疗清单?一项横断面调查的结果。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2018 Dec;24(1):32-38. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2017.1395018. Epub 2017 Nov 23.
8
Low-Cost, High-Volume Health Services Contribute The Most To Unnecessary Health Spending.低成本、高数量的卫生服务对不必要的卫生支出贡献最大。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Oct 1;36(10):1701-1704. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0385.
9
Evidence for overuse of medical services around the world.世界各地医疗服务过度使用的证据。
Lancet. 2017 Jul 8;390(10090):156-168. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32585-5. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
10
Doctors' perspectives on PSA testing illuminate established differences in prostate cancer screening rates between Australia and the UK: a qualitative study.医生对前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)检测的看法揭示了澳大利亚和英国在前列腺癌筛查率方面已有的差异:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Dec 5;6(12):e011932. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011932.

低价值医疗:趋同与挑战 对《促进低价值医疗的关键因素:来自美国、加拿大和荷兰专家的观点》的评论

Low-Value Care: Convergence and Challenges Comment on "Key Factors That Promote Low-Value Care: Views From Experts From the United States, Canada, and the Netherlands".

作者信息

Ingvarsson Sara, Nilsen Per, Hasson Henna

机构信息

Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Department of Health, Medical and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.

出版信息

Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Dec 6;11(11):2762-2764. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.7017.

DOI:10.34172/ijhpm.2022.7017
PMID:36404499
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9818099/
Abstract

Interest has increased in the topic of de-implementation, ie, reducing so-called low-value care (LVC). The article "Key Factors That Promote Low-Value Care: Views From Experts From the United States, Canada, and the Netherlands" by Verkerk and colleagues identifies national-level factors affecting LVC use in those three countries. This commentary raises three critical points regarding the study. First, the study does not clearly define the national level. Secondly, national-level factors might not be relevant for all types of LVCs and thirdly, the study's rather limited sample makes it difficult to draw firm conclusions. We also include some critical comments related to some of the study's findings in relation to results of our recently published scoping review of the international literature on de-implementation and use of LVC and an interview study with primary care physicians on LVC use. Finally, we provide some suggestions for further research that we believe is needed to improve understanding of LVC use and facilitate its de-implementation.

摘要

对去实施(即减少所谓的低价值医疗(LVC))这一话题的兴趣与日俱增。韦尔克及其同事所著的《促进低价值医疗的关键因素:来自美国、加拿大和荷兰专家的观点》一文,确定了影响这三个国家低价值医疗使用情况的国家级因素。本评论针对该研究提出了三个关键点。第一,该研究未明确界定国家级层面。第二,国家级因素可能并非适用于所有类型的低价值医疗。第三,该研究样本相当有限,难以得出确凿结论。我们还纳入了一些与该研究的某些发现相关的批判性评论,这些发现与我们最近发表的关于去实施和低价值医疗使用的国际文献的范围综述结果,以及一项针对基层医疗医生低价值医疗使用情况的访谈研究有关。最后,我们提供了一些进一步研究的建议,我们认为这些研究对于增进对低价值医疗使用情况的理解以及推动其去实施是必要的。