Llanos-Lagos Cristian, Ramirez-Campillo Rodrigo, Sáez de Villarreal Eduardo
Physical Performance Sports Research Centre (PPSRC), Universidad Pablo de Olavide, 41704, Seville, Spain.
Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences Institute. School of Physical Therapy. Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Universidad Andres Bello, 7591538, Santiago, Chile.
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2025 Jul 9. doi: 10.1007/s00421-025-05883-2.
Endurance cycling performance is determined by maximal oxygen uptake (VOmax), maximal metabolic steady state (MMSS), non-oxidative energy contribution (i.e., anaerobic capacity and anaerobic power) and cycling efficiency and power related to VOmax (pVOmax). Strength training can improve these variables. However, is yet to be clarified the effects of heavy strength training (≥ 80% of one repetition maximum).
The aim of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to analyse heavy strength training effects on physiological determinants of endurance cyclists' performance.
A systematic search was carried out in PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus including articles indexed up to February 2025. Following the PICOS criteria: Population, endurance cyclists aged ≥ 18 years or older, without restriction of sex or performance level; Intervention, heavy strength training (≥ 3 weeks); Comparator, group that performed cycling endurance training without receiving heavy strength training; Outcome, physiological determinants of endurance cycling (i.e., VOmax, pVOmax, MMSS, cycling efficiency, anaerobic capacity, and anaerobic power) and/or cycling performance (i.e., time to exhaustion and time trial [combined for analyses]), measured before and after the intervention and; Study design, randomised and non-randomised controlled studies. Risk of bias in studies was assessed (PEDro), and certainty of evidence at the outcome level (GRADE). Random-effects meta-analyses (for VOmax, pVOmax, MMSS, anaerobic capacity, anaerobic power and cycling performance), three-level random-effects meta-analyses (for cycling efficiency) and moderator analyses (i.e., participant and intervention characteristics) were conducted. Significance was set as p ≤ 0.05.
Included studies (n = 17) comprised 262 participants (60 female) with a mean initial VOmax level of 61.25 ml/kg/min, with interventions lasting between 5 and 25 weeks, with 1-3 sessions per week. Compared to controls, heavy strength training showed a significant effect on cycling efficiency (effect size [ES] = 0.353, p = 0.012, LRT = 1), anaerobic power (ES = 0.560, p = 0.024, I = 29.100) and cycling performance (ES = 0.463, p = 0.016, I < 0.001), with no significant effect on VOmax, pVOmax, MMSS, and anaerobic capacity (all p ≥ 0.263, I < 0.001). No significant moderating effect was found for participant characteristics (i.e., sex, body mass, height, performance level, and strength training experience) or intervention characteristics (i.e., duration, training frequency, total sessions) (all p ≥ 0.170). Results presented low certainty of evidence.
Heavy strength training can improve cycling performance (i.e., time to exhaustion; time trial) in endurance cyclist. This improvement may be mainly due to an improvement in cycling efficiency and anaerobic power. These results occur without changes in VOmax, pVOmax, MMSS or anaerobic capacity. Nonetheless, the low certainty of evidence precludes robust recommendations regarding optimal implementation of heavy strength training.
The original protocol was registered ( https://osf.io/75xt4 ) at the Open Science Framework.
耐力自行车运动表现由最大摄氧量(VO₂max)、最大代谢稳态(MMSS)、非氧化能量贡献(即无氧能力和无氧功率)以及与VO₂max相关的骑行效率和功率(pVO₂max)决定。力量训练可以改善这些变量。然而,大强度力量训练(≥1次重复最大值的80%)的效果尚待阐明。
本系统评价及荟萃分析旨在分析大强度力量训练对耐力自行车运动员运动表现生理决定因素的影响。
在PubMed、科学网和Scopus中进行系统检索,纳入截至2025年2月索引的文章。遵循PICOS标准:研究对象,年龄≥18岁的耐力自行车运动员,不受性别或运动水平限制;干预措施,大强度力量训练(≥3周);对照,进行自行车耐力训练但未接受大强度力量训练的组;结局指标,耐力自行车运动的生理决定因素(即VO₂max、pVO₂max、MMSS、骑行效率、无氧能力和无氧功率)和/或骑行表现(即疲劳时间和计时赛[合并分析]),在干预前后测量;研究设计,随机和非随机对照研究。评估研究中的偏倚风险(PEDro)以及结局水平证据的确定性(GRADE)。进行随机效应荟萃分析(针对VO₂max、pVO₂max、MMSS、无氧能力、无氧功率和骑行表现)、三级随机效应荟萃分析(针对骑行效率)和调节因素分析(即参与者和干预特征)。显著性设定为p≤0.05。
纳入的研究(n = 17)包括262名参与者(60名女性),初始VO₂max平均水平为61.25 ml/kg/min,干预持续5至25周,每周1至3次训练。与对照组相比,大强度力量训练对骑行效率(效应量[ES]=0.353,p = 0.012,I² = 1)、无氧功率(ES = 0.560,p = 0.024,I² = 29.100)和骑行表现(ES = 0.463,p = 0.016,I² < 0.001)有显著影响,对VO₂max、pVO₂max、MMSS和无氧能力无显著影响(所有p≥0.263,I² < 0.001)。未发现参与者特征(即性别、体重、身高、运动水平和力量训练经验)或干预特征(即持续时间、训练频率、总训练次数)有显著调节作用(所有p≥0.170)。结果显示证据确定性较低。
大强度力量训练可提高耐力自行车运动员的骑行表现(即疲劳时间;计时赛)。这种改善可能主要归因于骑行效率和无氧功率的提高。这些结果出现时VO₂max、pVO₂max、MMSS或无氧能力并未改变。尽管如此,证据的低确定性妨碍了就大强度力量训练的最佳实施提出有力建议。
原始方案在开放科学框架(https://osf.io/75xt4 )注册。