Gomes-da-Silva Janaína, Nic Lughadha Eimear, Forzza Rafaela Campostrini
Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro, Rua Pacheco Leão, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Science Directorate, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 9;20(7):e0326507. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326507. eCollection 2025.
Brilliantly adapted from aphorist and geneticist Dobzhansky's phrase, "Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of taxonomy" conveys the fact that various scientific fields depend on correctly identified and accurately described species. In this sense, estimating the number of extant species is one of the fundamental issues and has direct implications for biodiversity conservation. Worldwide, approximately 370,000 angiosperm species are known to science; however, studies indicate that another ~100,000 or as many as 315,000 are yet to be described for science. Brazil is recognized for its megabiodiversity and currently recognizes 32,900 native species of angiosperms. What would be the impact on conservation priorities if all undescribed species were known and the catalog was complete? To explore this, we analyzed datasets of taxonomic information available for Brazilian angiosperms published between 1753 and 2020 to understand patterns of species discovery and identify which areas in which Brazilian phytogeographic domains harbor the largest number of species unknown to science. The likely number of species remaining to be described was extrapolated using predictive models and incorporating taxonomic effort over time. We estimated that the catalog of Brazilian angiosperms is at least 19-23% incomplete, with the proportion incomplete ranging from 4% to 39% across phytogeographic domains, and 7343-9595 species still awaiting description. Despite differences between models, overall trends consistently indicate the Amazonia and Caatinga regions offer greatest potential for new species descriptions. Our analysis revealed that human population density explains more variation in rates of angiosperm description over centuries than taxonomic effort, but taxonomic effort is a better predictor of recent description rates. Worryingly, 80% of areas predicted to be richest in undescribed angiosperm species do not overlap with protected areas (PAs), but 50% are within Indigenous lands. These findings highlight the urgent need to expand collection efforts and PAs coverage, particularly in the Caatinga, which has low levels of protection, and in Amazonia, where collaboration with indigenous communities is crucial for biodiversity conservation. Without direct action, many undescribed species and their undocumented traits and potential may be lost.
“生物学中没有任何事物是有意义的,除非从分类学的角度去理解”,它传达了一个事实,即各个科学领域都依赖于正确识别和准确描述的物种。从这个意义上说,估计现存物种的数量是一个基本问题,并且对生物多样性保护有着直接影响。在全球范围内,科学已知约37万种被子植物;然而,研究表明,另外约10万种甚至多达31.5万种尚未被科学描述。巴西因其巨大的生物多样性而闻名,目前已确认32900种本土被子植物。如果所有未被描述的物种都为人所知且分类目录完整,这将对保护重点产生什么影响呢?为了探究这一问题,我们分析了1753年至2020年间发表的巴西被子植物分类信息数据集,以了解物种发现模式,并确定巴西植物地理区域中哪些地区拥有最多尚未被科学认知的物种。利用预测模型并结合随时间推移的分类学工作,推断出可能仍有待描述的物种数量。我们估计巴西被子植物目录至少有19% - 23%不完整,各植物地理区域的不完整比例在4%至39%之间,仍有7343 - 9595种物种有待描述。尽管模型之间存在差异,但总体趋势一致表明亚马逊地区和卡廷加地区提供了发现新物种的最大潜力。我们的分析表明,几个世纪以来,人口密度比分类学工作更能解释被子植物描述率的变化,但分类学工作是近期描述率的更好预测指标。令人担忧的是,预计未被描述的被子植物物种最丰富的地区中,80%与保护区不重叠,但50%位于原住民土地内。这些发现凸显了迫切需要扩大采集工作和保护区覆盖范围,特别是在保护水平较低的卡廷加地区,以及在亚马逊地区,与当地社区合作对于生物多样性保护至关重要。如果不采取直接行动,许多未被描述的物种及其未记录的特征和潜力可能会丧失。