Zheng Fanggui, Wang Yiqing, Xi Huihui, Xiao Siyue, Feng Xiuyan, Gong Xun, Liu Jian
Southwest Forestry University Kunming China.
Key Laboratory for Economic Plants and Biotechnology, Yunnan Key Laboratory for Wild Plant Resources Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences Kunming China.
Ecol Evol. 2025 Jul 8;15(7):e71769. doi: 10.1002/ece3.71769. eCollection 2025 Jul.
Over long-term evolutionary processes, sympatric affinities may develop reproductive isolation mechanisms, such as temporal isolation and ecological divergence, to maintain species independence. However, due to lacking strict geographic isolation barriers, sympatrically distributed closely related species may experience interspecific gene flow and genetic introgression, which can blur species boundaries. Here we focus on two sympatrically distributed species along the Lancang (Mekong) River in three populations from Southwest China, and , to investigate the extent of genetic introgression between them and how they maintain species boundaries. Using 16 microsatellite markers, we first genotyped and assessed the introgression patterns between the two species and their seedlings in each population. We further compared their geographical and ecological divergence, including the fine-scale spatial distribution, habitats, reproductive phenology, and pollinators, based on a systematic field survey across its entire range in China. We found that sympatric populations of and , along with their seedlings, showed no genetic admixture. Further evidence supports that the two species exhibited significant variations in habitat indicators such as slope position and soil pH. Additionally, significant differences were observed in pollinator communities and coning behavior. These findings indicate that there is no hybridization between and under natural conditions. Instead, they maintain species boundaries primarily through reproductive isolation driven by divergent coning times and pollinator specificity, coupled with niche differentiation. This study not only provides a representative case for understanding mechanisms of plant species boundary maintenance but also offers critical theoretical support for the reintroduction and conservation of cycads.
在长期的进化过程中,同域近缘种可能会发展出繁殖隔离机制,如时间隔离和生态分化,以维持物种的独立性。然而,由于缺乏严格的地理隔离屏障,同域分布的近缘物种可能会经历种间基因流动和基因渗入,这会模糊物种界限。在此,我们聚焦于中国西南部三个种群中沿澜沧江(湄公河)同域分布的两个物种,[物种名称1]和[物种名称2](此处原文缺失具体物种名),以研究它们之间基因渗入的程度以及它们如何维持物种界限。我们使用16个微卫星标记,首先对每个种群中这两个物种及其幼苗进行基因分型并评估基因渗入模式。基于在中国整个分布范围内进行的系统实地调查,我们进一步比较了它们的地理和生态分化,包括精细尺度的空间分布、栖息地、繁殖物候和传粉者。我们发现,[物种名称1]和[物种名称2]的同域种群及其幼苗没有显示出基因混合。进一步的证据支持这两个物种在诸如坡位和土壤pH值等栖息地指标上表现出显著差异。此外,在传粉者群落和球果形成行为方面也观察到了显著差异。这些发现表明,在自然条件下,[物种名称1]和[物种名称2]之间不存在杂交。相反,它们主要通过由不同球果形成时间和传粉者特异性驱动的繁殖隔离以及生态位分化来维持物种界限。这项研究不仅为理解植物物种界限维持机制提供了一个具有代表性的案例,也为苏铁的重新引入和保护提供了关键的理论支持。