• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

铋剂与联合疗法根除幽门螺杆菌的比较:一项前瞻性随机临床试验。

Comparison of bismuth and concomitant therapy for eradication: a prospective, randomized clinical trial.

作者信息

Oueslati A, Mohamed G, Bostani S, Boughoula K, Bizid S, Ben Abdallah H, Bouali R, Abdelli M N

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Military hospital of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia.

Tunis El Manar University, Faculty of medicine of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia.

出版信息

Future Sci OA. 2025 Dec;11(1):2527539. doi: 10.1080/20565623.2025.2527539. Epub 2025 Jul 10.

DOI:10.1080/20565623.2025.2527539
PMID:40636985
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12247181/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In Tunisia, concomitant quadruple therapy (QTC) has been the standard first-line treatment for () infection. However, increasing resistance to clarithromycin (28%) has raised concerns about its long-term efficacy. Bismuth-based quadruple therapy (QTB) offers an alternative, yet its higher cost and safety profile remain debated. This study aimed to compare the efficacy, safety, and cost of both regimens.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective, randomized, open-label study enrolling 200 patients naïve to any anti-HP treatment. Patients were randomized to either 10 days of bismuth therapy (QTB: potassium bismuth subcitrate, metronidazole, and tetracycline hydrochloride, omeprazole) or 14 days of concomitant quadruple therapy (QTC: amoxicillin, clarithromycin, metronidazole, esomeprazole). eradication as defined by a negative urea breath test 4-6 weeks after treatment.

RESULTS

Among 200 patients, the intention-to-treat eradication rate was 82% for QTC and 87% for QTB (p = 0.29); per-protocol rates were 84.53% and 89.58%, respectively (p = 0.39). Compliance was high (97% in QTC vs 96% in QTB; p = 0.32). Adverse events were similar between groups (61.85% for QTB vs 69% for QTC; p = 0.29).

CONCLUSION

Bismuth and concomitant quadruple therapies were comparable in terms of efficacy and safety but didn't achieve the accepted minimum eradication rate (90%).

摘要

背景

在突尼斯,联合四联疗法(QTC)一直是(幽门螺杆菌)感染的标准一线治疗方法。然而,对克拉霉素的耐药性不断增加(28%)引发了对其长期疗效的担忧。铋剂四联疗法(QTB)提供了一种替代方案,但其较高的成本和安全性仍存在争议。本研究旨在比较两种治疗方案的疗效、安全性和成本。

方法

我们进行了一项前瞻性、随机、开放标签研究,纳入200例未接受过任何抗幽门螺杆菌治疗的患者。患者被随机分为接受10天铋剂治疗(QTB:次硝酸铋钾、甲硝唑、盐酸四环素和奥美拉唑)或14天联合四联疗法(QTC:阿莫西林、克拉霉素、甲硝唑和埃索美拉唑)。治疗后4-6周尿素呼气试验阴性定义为幽门螺杆菌根除。

结果

在200例患者中,QTC的意向性治疗根除率为82%,QTB为87%(p = 0.29);符合方案分析的根除率分别为84.53%和89.58%(p = 0.39)。依从性较高(QTC为97%,QTB为96%;p = 0.32)。两组间不良事件相似(QTB为61.85%,QTC为69%;p = 0.29)。

结论

铋剂四联疗法和联合四联疗法在疗效和安全性方面具有可比性,但未达到公认的最低根除率(90%)。

相似文献

1
Comparison of bismuth and concomitant therapy for eradication: a prospective, randomized clinical trial.铋剂与联合疗法根除幽门螺杆菌的比较:一项前瞻性随机临床试验。
Future Sci OA. 2025 Dec;11(1):2527539. doi: 10.1080/20565623.2025.2527539. Epub 2025 Jul 10.
2
Helicobacter pylori and gastric or duodenal ulcer.幽门螺杆菌与胃或十二指肠溃疡。
Prescrire Int. 2016 Jan;25(167):18-23.
3
Sequential versus standard triple first-line therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication.用于根除幽门螺杆菌的序贯疗法与标准三联一线疗法对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 28;2016(6):CD009034. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009034.pub2.
4
Optimum duration of regimens for Helicobacter pylori eradication.幽门螺杆菌根除治疗方案的最佳疗程
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 11;2013(12):CD008337. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008337.pub2.
5
Tailored therapy guided by genotypic resistance from gastric mucosa samples in the first-line treatment of infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.基于胃黏膜样本基因型耐药指导的一线治疗感染的个体化疗法:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2025 Jun 26;18:17562848251348826. doi: 10.1177/17562848251348826. eCollection 2025.
6
Management of urinary stones by experts in stone disease (ESD 2025).结石病专家对尿路结石的管理(2025年结石病专家共识)
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2025 Jun 30;97(2):14085. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2025.14085.
7
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
8
Non-invasive diagnostic tests for Helicobacter pylori infection.幽门螺杆菌感染的非侵入性诊断测试。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 15;3(3):CD012080. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012080.pub2.
9
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
10
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.

本文引用的文献

1
Concomitant and Bismuth Quadruple Therapy for Eradication in Southern Italy: Preliminary Data from a Randomized Clinical Trial.意大利南部根除幽门螺杆菌的联合铋剂四联疗法:一项随机临床试验的初步数据
Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 Apr 10;13(4):348. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13040348.
2
[Not Available].[无可用内容]。
Tunis Med. 2023 Aug-Sep;101(8-9):657-669.
3
Management of Helicobacter pylori treatment failures: A large population-based study (HP treatment failures trial).幽门螺杆菌治疗失败的管理:一项基于大量人群的研究(幽门螺杆菌治疗失败试验)
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 30;18(11):e0294403. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294403. eCollection 2023.
4
Effectiveness of Helicobacter pylori Treatments According to Antibiotic Resistance.根据抗生素耐药性评估幽门螺杆菌治疗的效果。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2024 Apr 1;119(4):646-654. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002600. Epub 2023 Nov 17.
5
Antibiotic Resistance, Susceptibility Testing and Stewardship in Infection.感染中的抗生素耐药性、药敏试验和管理
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Jul 20;24(14):11708. doi: 10.3390/ijms241411708.
6
Standard Bismuth Quadruple Therapy versus Concomitant Therapy for the First-Line Treatment of Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.标准铋剂四联疗法与联合疗法用于感染一线治疗的比较:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2023 May 3;12(9):3258. doi: 10.3390/jcm12093258.
7
Global prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection between 1980 and 2022: a systematic review and meta-analysis.全球范围内 1980 年至 2022 年幽门螺杆菌感染的流行率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Jun;8(6):553-564. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(23)00070-5. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
8
Evolution of Resistance to Antibiotics: A Topic of Increasing Concern.抗生素耐药性的演变:一个日益受到关注的话题。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Feb 4;12(2):332. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12020332.
9
Rates of Antimicrobial Resistance in Helicobacter pylori Isolates From Clinical Trial Patients Across the US and Europe.幽门螺杆菌分离株的抗生素耐药率在美国和欧洲的临床试验患者中。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2023 Feb 1;118(2):269-275. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002045. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
10
Management of infection: the Maastricht VI/Florence consensus report.感染的管理:马斯特里赫特VI/佛罗伦萨共识报告
Gut. 2022 Aug 8. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-327745.