UMR BRIC, INSERM U1312, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Department of Medicine, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2023 Feb 1;118(2):269-275. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002045. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
Guidelines recommend that proton pump inhibitor-based triple regimens with clarithromycin not be used for Helicobacter pylori infection in areas where clarithromycin resistance is ≥15%, or in patients with prior macrolide use. Up-to-date information on local resistance patterns is limited, especially in the US. Here, we report resistance rates to antibiotics commonly used to treat H. pylori from a large study conducted in the US and Europe (pHalcon-HP).
Gastric mucosal biopsies were collected from adult participants with H. pylori infection during screening. Minimum inhibitory concentrations were determined via agar dilution for clarithromycin, amoxicillin, and metronidazole, with breakpoints ≥1 μg/mL, >0.125 μg/mL, and >8 μg/mL, respectively. Resistance rates were obtained for the US and Europe, and also for US subregions and participating European countries.
Resistance rates were established in isolates from 907 participants. Overall, 22.2% were resistant to clarithromycin, 1.2% to amoxicillin, and 69.2% to metronidazole. Resistance in the US and Europe was similar; metronidazole resistance was the most prevalent (50%-79%) and amoxicillin the least (≤5%). In all subregions, ≥15% of isolates were resistant to clarithromycin, except the UK (0/8 isolates). Among clarithromycin-resistant isolates, 75% were also metronidazole-resistant. Two US isolates were resistant to clarithromycin and amoxicillin; one of these was also metronidazole-resistant.
The resistance rates observed in this study argue against the continued empiric use of proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy containing clarithromycin, per treatment guidelines, and highlight the need for antibiotic resistance surveillance and novel treatment strategies for H. pylori infection in the US and Europe.
指南建议,在克拉霉素耐药率≥15%的地区,或在既往使用过大环内酯类药物的患者中,不应使用质子泵抑制剂为基础的三联疗法治疗幽门螺杆菌感染。关于当地耐药模式的最新信息有限,尤其是在美国。在此,我们报告了一项在美欧进行的大型研究(pHalcon-HP)中,用于治疗幽门螺杆菌的常用抗生素的耐药率。
在筛选期间,从感染幽门螺杆菌的成年参与者中采集胃黏膜活检标本。通过琼脂稀释法测定克拉霉素、阿莫西林和甲硝唑的最小抑菌浓度,分别以≥1μg/ml、>0.125μg/ml和>8μg/ml为耐药折点。获得了美国和欧洲的耐药率,以及美国各地区和参与的欧洲国家的耐药率。
在 907 名参与者的分离株中确定了耐药率。总体而言,22.2%对克拉霉素耐药,1.2%对阿莫西林耐药,69.2%对甲硝唑耐药。美国和欧洲的耐药率相似;甲硝唑耐药最为普遍(50%-79%),阿莫西林耐药率最低(≤5%)。在所有地区,除英国(8 个分离株均未耐药)外,≥15%的分离株对克拉霉素耐药。在克拉霉素耐药的分离株中,75%也对甲硝唑耐药。有 2 株美国分离株对克拉霉素和阿莫西林耐药;其中一株也对甲硝唑耐药。
本研究观察到的耐药率表明,根据治疗指南,不应继续使用质子泵抑制剂为基础的三联疗法治疗含有克拉霉素的方案,这突显了美国和欧洲需要进行抗生素耐药监测和新的幽门螺杆菌感染治疗策略。