Suppr超能文献

老年创伤中的分诊不足:一项多中心队列研究的见解

Undertriage in geriatric trauma: insights from a multicentre cohort study.

作者信息

Koch Daniel Anthony, Becker Lars, Schweigkofler Uwe, Hagebusch Paul, Faul Philipp, Waydhas Christian, Pavlu Florian, Baacke Markus, Michael Caspers, Clemens Valentin, Duesing Helena, Froehlich Matthias, Imach Sebastian, Jensen Kai-Oliver, Kleber Christian, Keß Annette, Matthes Gerrit, Nohl Andre, Oezkurtul Orkun, Paffrath Thomas, Pedersen Vera, Sprengel Kai, Stoermann Philipp, Trentzsch Heiko, Lefering Rolf, Bieler Dan, Hackenberg Lisa

机构信息

Department of Trauma Surgery and Orthopaedics, BG Unfallklinik Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Department of Trauma Surgery, Hand- and Reconstructive Surgery, Essen University, Essen, Germany.

出版信息

Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2025 Jul 10;33(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s13049-025-01432-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

With the aging population, the number of geriatric trauma patients continues to rise, posing significant challenges for emergency care and trauma management. Structured trauma team activation (TTA) protocols aim to provide timely and adequate treatment for severely injured patients. However, evidence suggests that current triage criteria may inadequately address the specific needs of geriatric patients, potentially leading to undertriage and worse outcomes.

METHODS

The prospective, multicentre observational cohort study analysed trauma team activation and triage practices for patients aged ≥ 70 years across 12 Level 1 trauma centres across rural and urban regions in Germany and Switzerland. Data were prospectively collected from December 2020 to February 2021, following the STROBE guidelines. Triage decisions were compared with the TAcTIC (Trauma Team Activation and Trauma/Injury Care) consensus criteria to assess undertriage and overtriage rates. Key outcomes included trauma team activation rates, injury severity, transport characteristics, and early mortality.

RESULTS

Among 3,753 trauma patients, 1,371 (36.5%) were geriatric (≥ 70 years). Trauma team activation was significantly lower in the geriatric group (15.8%) compared to younger patients (31.8%), despite similar injury severity. Post-hoc analysis revealed that 53.8% of geriatric patients requiring trauma care were undertriaged. Head injuries (47.7%) and pelvic fractures (5.7%) were more common in geriatric patients in comparison to the younger cohort. Mortality within 48 h was more than three times as high in geriatric patients (1.8% vs. 0.5%).

CONCLUSION

A significant undertriage rate (53.8%) was identified among geriatric trauma patients, contributing to delayed care and increased mortality. Undertriage of geriatric trauma patients remains a critical issue, reflecting the insufficiency of current trauma activation protocols. Tailored triage criteria that even more consider age-related physiological differences, comorbidities, and frailty are urgently needed. Future updates to trauma guidelines should aim to reduce undertriage and improve outcomes for this vulnerable population.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

Not applicable.

摘要

背景

随着人口老龄化,老年创伤患者数量持续增加,给急诊护理和创伤管理带来了重大挑战。结构化创伤团队启动(TTA)方案旨在为重伤患者提供及时且充分的治疗。然而,有证据表明,当前的分诊标准可能无法充分满足老年患者的特殊需求,可能导致分诊不足和更差的预后。

方法

这项前瞻性、多中心观察性队列研究分析了德国和瑞士城乡地区12家一级创伤中心中年龄≥70岁患者的创伤团队启动和分诊实践。按照STROBE指南,于2020年12月至2021年2月前瞻性收集数据。将分诊决策与TAcTIC(创伤团队启动与创伤/损伤护理)共识标准进行比较,以评估分诊不足和分诊过度率。主要结局包括创伤团队启动率、损伤严重程度、转运特征和早期死亡率。

结果

在3753例创伤患者中,1371例(36.5%)为老年患者(≥70岁)。尽管损伤严重程度相似,但老年组的创伤团队启动率(15.8%)显著低于年轻患者(31.8%)。事后分析显示,53.8%需要创伤护理的老年患者被分诊不足。与年轻队列相比,老年患者中头部损伤(47.7%)和骨盆骨折(5.7%)更为常见。老年患者48小时内的死亡率是年轻患者的三倍多(1.8%对0.5%)。

结论

在老年创伤患者中发现了较高的分诊不足率(53.8%),这导致了护理延迟和死亡率增加。老年创伤患者的分诊不足仍然是一个关键问题,反映出当前创伤启动方案的不足。迫切需要更加考虑年龄相关生理差异、合并症和虚弱状况的定制分诊标准。未来创伤指南的更新应旨在减少分诊不足并改善这一脆弱人群 的预后。

临床试验编号

不适用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验