Donet Jenna R, Marshall Philip H, Serra Michael J
Department of Psychological Sciences, Texas Tech University, 2700 18Th St, Lubbock, TX, 79410, USA.
Department of Medical Education, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX, USA.
Mem Cognit. 2025 Jul 11. doi: 10.3758/s13421-025-01750-9.
The decision-making processes involved in relying on an external source (cognitive offloading) for memory retrieval tasks have been discussed in numerous publications. The nature of original learning strategies could be an important contributing factor to the decision to offload but is unexamined. In this study we used a paired-associate learning task to investigate the influences of mnemonic (associative) and rote learning strategies on the likelihood of opting out, either by offloading or omitting a response. Further, we investigated the ways that certain outcome variables (specifically, the number of opt-out responses and amount of time spent studying) may in fact influence the relationship between learning strategy and decisions to persist in effortful search. We also investigated the degree to which any effects of learning strategy are specific to either offloading or omission decisions. Overall, we found a mnemonic learning effect of decreased frequency of general opt-out decisions relative to the rote group. Further, we found that mnemonic learning led to longer internal search times prior to opt-out responses, suggesting additional, intentional search processes such as trying to retrieve the original mnemonic, to help recover the response word. A partial mediation of the learning strategy effect on omission latency by performance factors suggested the learning strategy effect affects omission latency independently. Finally, relative to the rote learning strategy, the mnemonic strategy led to fewer instances of offloading, and longer decision latencies for omission responses.
众多出版物中都讨论了在记忆检索任务中依赖外部来源(认知卸载)的决策过程。原始学习策略的性质可能是决定卸载的一个重要因素,但尚未得到研究。在本研究中,我们使用配对联想学习任务来研究记忆(联想)和死记硬背学习策略对选择退出可能性的影响,选择退出的方式要么是卸载,要么是不做反应。此外,我们研究了某些结果变量(具体来说,选择退出反应的数量和学习所花费的时间)实际上可能影响学习策略与坚持进行费力搜索的决策之间关系的方式。我们还研究了学习策略的任何影响在多大程度上特定于卸载或不做反应的决策。总体而言,我们发现相对于死记硬背组,记忆学习有一个普遍选择退出决策频率降低的效应。此外,我们发现记忆学习导致在选择退出反应之前有更长的内部搜索时间,这表明存在额外的、有意的搜索过程,比如试图检索原始记忆,以帮助找回反应词。学习策略对不做反应潜伏期的影响部分由表现因素介导,这表明学习策略效应独立地影响不做反应潜伏期。最后,相对于死记硬背学习策略,记忆策略导致卸载的情况更少,且不做反应的决策潜伏期更长。