• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学习策略对反应回忆中卸载决策的影响。

The effect of learning strategies on offloading decisions in response recall.

作者信息

Donet Jenna R, Marshall Philip H, Serra Michael J

机构信息

Department of Psychological Sciences, Texas Tech University, 2700 18Th St, Lubbock, TX, 79410, USA.

Department of Medical Education, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX, USA.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2025 Jul 11. doi: 10.3758/s13421-025-01750-9.

DOI:10.3758/s13421-025-01750-9
PMID:40643828
Abstract

The decision-making processes involved in relying on an external source (cognitive offloading) for memory retrieval tasks have been discussed in numerous publications. The nature of original learning strategies could be an important contributing factor to the decision to offload but is unexamined. In this study we used a paired-associate learning task to investigate the influences of mnemonic (associative) and rote learning strategies on the likelihood of opting out, either by offloading or omitting a response. Further, we investigated the ways that certain outcome variables (specifically, the number of opt-out responses and amount of time spent studying) may in fact influence the relationship between learning strategy and decisions to persist in effortful search. We also investigated the degree to which any effects of learning strategy are specific to either offloading or omission decisions. Overall, we found a mnemonic learning effect of decreased frequency of general opt-out decisions relative to the rote group. Further, we found that mnemonic learning led to longer internal search times prior to opt-out responses, suggesting additional, intentional search processes such as trying to retrieve the original mnemonic, to help recover the response word. A partial mediation of the learning strategy effect on omission latency by performance factors suggested the learning strategy effect affects omission latency independently. Finally, relative to the rote learning strategy, the mnemonic strategy led to fewer instances of offloading, and longer decision latencies for omission responses.

摘要

众多出版物中都讨论了在记忆检索任务中依赖外部来源(认知卸载)的决策过程。原始学习策略的性质可能是决定卸载的一个重要因素,但尚未得到研究。在本研究中,我们使用配对联想学习任务来研究记忆(联想)和死记硬背学习策略对选择退出可能性的影响,选择退出的方式要么是卸载,要么是不做反应。此外,我们研究了某些结果变量(具体来说,选择退出反应的数量和学习所花费的时间)实际上可能影响学习策略与坚持进行费力搜索的决策之间关系的方式。我们还研究了学习策略的任何影响在多大程度上特定于卸载或不做反应的决策。总体而言,我们发现相对于死记硬背组,记忆学习有一个普遍选择退出决策频率降低的效应。此外,我们发现记忆学习导致在选择退出反应之前有更长的内部搜索时间,这表明存在额外的、有意的搜索过程,比如试图检索原始记忆,以帮助找回反应词。学习策略对不做反应潜伏期的影响部分由表现因素介导,这表明学习策略效应独立地影响不做反应潜伏期。最后,相对于死记硬背学习策略,记忆策略导致卸载的情况更少,且不做反应的决策潜伏期更长。

相似文献

1
The effect of learning strategies on offloading decisions in response recall.学习策略对反应回忆中卸载决策的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2025 Jul 11. doi: 10.3758/s13421-025-01750-9.
2
Short-Term Memory Impairment短期记忆障碍
3
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
4
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
5
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
6
Factors that impact on the use of mechanical ventilation weaning protocols in critically ill adults and children: a qualitative evidence-synthesis.影响重症成人和儿童机械通气撤机方案使用的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 4;10(10):CD011812. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011812.pub2.
7
Transabdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) versus totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for inguinal hernia repair.经腹腹膜前(TAPP)与完全腹膜外(TEP)腹腔镜技术治疗腹股沟疝修补术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jul 4;7(7):CD004703. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004703.pub3.
8
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
9
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.
10
Hormone replacement therapy to maintain cognitive function in women with dementia.激素替代疗法用于维持痴呆女性的认知功能。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002(3):CD003799. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003799.

本文引用的文献

1
Perseveration on cognitive strategies.认知策略的固着。
Mem Cognit. 2024 Apr;52(3):459-475. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01475-7. Epub 2023 Oct 24.
2
Know Your Cognitive Environment! Mental Models as Crucial Determinant of Offloading Preferences.了解你的认知环境!心智模型是卸载偏好的关键决定因素。
Hum Factors. 2022 May;64(3):499-513. doi: 10.1177/0018720820956861. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
3
Using Tools to Help Us Think: Actual but Also Believed Reliability Modulates Cognitive Offloading.利用工具辅助思考:实际可靠度与信念可靠度均可调节认知减负。
Hum Factors. 2019 Mar;61(2):243-254. doi: 10.1177/0018720818797553. Epub 2018 Aug 31.
4
Answers at your fingertips: Access to the Internet influences willingness to answer questions.答案近在指尖:接入互联网会影响回答问题的意愿。
Conscious Cogn. 2015 Dec;37:91-102. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.08.008. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
5
Storing information in-the-world: Metacognition and cognitive offloading in a short-term memory task.在现实世界中存储信息:短期记忆任务中的元认知与认知卸载
Conscious Cogn. 2015 Nov;36:61-74. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.05.014. Epub 2015 Jun 16.
6
Strategic offloading of delayed intentions into the external environment.将延迟意图策略性地卸载到外部环境中。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2015;68(5):971-92. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.972963. Epub 2014 Nov 18.
7
The diminishing criterion model for metacognitive regulation of time investment.时间投入元认知调节的递减标准模型
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Jun;143(3):1349-68. doi: 10.1037/a0035098. Epub 2013 Dec 23.
8
Statistical notes for clinical researchers: assessing normal distribution (2) using skewness and kurtosis.临床研究人员的统计学笔记:使用偏度和峰度评估正态分布(2)
Restor Dent Endod. 2013 Feb;38(1):52-4. doi: 10.5395/rde.2013.38.1.52. Epub 2013 Feb 26.
9
Decision making and the avoidance of cognitive demand.决策与认知需求的回避。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2010 Nov;139(4):665-82. doi: 10.1037/a0020198.
10
The soft constraints hypothesis: a rational analysis approach to resource allocation for interactive behavior.软约束假说:一种用于交互式行为资源分配的理性分析方法。
Psychol Rev. 2006 Jul;113(3):461-82. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.113.3.461.