Wang Jingkun, Lim Chiho, Nasir Mansoor, Nestorowich Justine, Berry Calandra, Ray Poushali, Pitts Brandon J, Yu Denny
School of Industrial Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47906, USA.
Human Factors Research & Advanced Engineering, Ford Motor Co., Dearborn, MI, 48126, USA.
Appl Ergon. 2025 Nov;129:104592. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2025.104592. Epub 2025 Jul 10.
Daily stress is a widespread and growing concern that impacts both mental and physical well-being. Although many evidence-based strategies exist, including yoga, mindfulness, cognitive-behavioral techniques, and sensory approaches such as scent, massage, auditory, and visual stimulation, they often require time, training, or specialized environments, which limits their accessibility in everyday life. This study explores an alternative, practical approach by evaluating a multi-sensory in-vehicle relaxation system designed for use while the vehicle is stationary. Given that personal vehicles are central to daily routines, they present an underutilized yet promising space for passive stress recovery. Forty-eight participants engaged in three conditions following a stress-inducing cognitive task: a control (no relaxation), multi-sensory relaxation without scent, and multi-sensory relaxation with scent. Physiological responses were measured via EEG and ECG, and subjective stress ratings were collected to assess each condition's impact. Both multi-sensory relaxation experiences (with and without scent) significantly reduced stress compared to the control. The relaxation methods resulted in a 33 ms increase in mean RR, a 5 ms increase in RMSSD, and an increase in the alpha/beta ratio at frontal EEG channels. Ninety-eight percent of participants preferred the relaxation experience over the control experience, and 62 % indicated they would use it regularly in similar scenarios. These findings suggest that multi-sensory relaxation methods can reduce stress following a cognitively demanding task and are well-received by participants. Integrating such relaxation experiences into vehicles could reduce stress.
日常压力是一个普遍且日益受到关注的问题,它会影响身心健康。尽管存在许多基于证据的策略,包括瑜伽、正念、认知行为技术以及诸如嗅觉、按摩、听觉和视觉刺激等感官方法,但它们通常需要时间、训练或特殊环境,这限制了它们在日常生活中的可及性。本研究通过评估一种专为车辆静止时使用而设计的多感官车内放松系统,探索了一种替代的、实用的方法。鉴于个人车辆在日常生活中至关重要,它们为被动压力恢复提供了一个未被充分利用但很有前景的空间。48名参与者在完成一项诱发压力的认知任务后,参与了三种情况:对照(无放松)、无嗅觉的多感官放松和有嗅觉的多感官放松。通过脑电图(EEG)和心电图(ECG)测量生理反应,并收集主观压力评分以评估每种情况的影响。与对照相比,两种多感官放松体验(有嗅觉和无嗅觉)均显著减轻了压力。放松方法使平均RR增加33毫秒,RMSSD增加5毫秒,额叶脑电图通道的α/β比值增加。98%的参与者更喜欢放松体验而非对照体验,62%的参与者表示他们会在类似场景中经常使用它。这些发现表明,多感官放松方法可以在完成认知要求较高的任务后减轻压力,并且受到参与者的欢迎。将这种放松体验整合到车辆中可以减轻压力。