• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将气候融资目标指向全球森林。

Targeting climate finance for global forests.

作者信息

Austin Kemen G, Favero Alice, Forsell Nicklas, Sohngen Brent L, Wade Chris M, Ohrel Sara B, Ragnauth Shaun

机构信息

RTI International, Center for Applied Economics and Strategy, 3040 E Cornwallis Rd, Durham, NC, USA.

The Nature Conservancy, 320 Blackwell Street, Suite 200, Durham, NC, USA.

出版信息

Nat Commun. 2025 Jul 11;16(1):6443. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-61657-6.

DOI:10.1038/s41467-025-61657-6
PMID:40645951
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12254286/
Abstract

Comprehensive data on costs of mitigation are needed to guide the scale and distribution of climate finance to sectors and regions where it will be most cost effective. We estimate the finance required to meet regional forest-based mitigation targets, aggregated from Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs). Regions accounting for 70% of global forest carbon can meet their forest-based NDCs with carbon prices below $100/tonne CO. The total investment required to meet regional targets is $20-72 billion per year by 2030. Under a global coordination scenario, in which the same level of finance is available, but mitigation takes place where it is least costly, we project twice as much mitigation in 2030 as in the upper bound NDC scenario, at the same cost. This highlights potential cost savings from increasing mitigation in regions with low-cost mitigation potential that is not reflected in current national commitments and informs the next generation of NDCs.

摘要

需要有关减缓成本的全面数据,以指导气候融资的规模和分配,使其流向最具成本效益的部门和地区。我们估算了实现区域森林减缓目标所需的资金,这些目标是根据国家自主贡献(NDC)汇总得出的。占全球森林碳量70%的地区,碳价格低于100美元/吨二氧化碳时就能实现其基于森林的国家自主贡献目标。到2030年,实现区域目标每年所需的总投资为200亿至720亿美元。在全球协调情景下,即有同等水平的资金可用,但在成本最低的地方进行减缓,我们预计2030年的减缓量将是国家自主贡献情景上限的两倍,而成本相同。这凸显了通过在低成本减缓潜力地区增加减缓量来节省潜在成本的可能性,而这在当前国家承诺中并未得到体现,同时也为下一代国家自主贡献提供了参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5eea/12254286/452f36318c07/41467_2025_61657_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5eea/12254286/708124803a2b/41467_2025_61657_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5eea/12254286/452f36318c07/41467_2025_61657_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5eea/12254286/708124803a2b/41467_2025_61657_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5eea/12254286/452f36318c07/41467_2025_61657_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Targeting climate finance for global forests.将气候融资目标指向全球森林。
Nat Commun. 2025 Jul 11;16(1):6443. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-61657-6.
2
Potential of shifting work hours for reducing heat-related loss and regional disparities in China: a modelling analysis.调整工作时间对减少中国与高温相关的损失及地区差异的潜力:一项建模分析。
Lancet Planet Health. 2025 Jul 3. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(25)00079-8.
3
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
4
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
5
Ventilator Management呼吸机管理
6
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
7
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
8
Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.抗抑郁药治疗成人慢性疼痛的疼痛管理:一项网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(62):1-155. doi: 10.3310/MKRT2948.
9
Consequences, costs and cost-effectiveness of workforce configurations in English acute hospitals.英国急症医院劳动力配置的后果、成本及成本效益
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jul;13(25):1-107. doi: 10.3310/ZBAR9152.
10
Automated devices for identifying peripheral arterial disease in people with leg ulceration: an evidence synthesis and cost-effectiveness analysis.用于识别下肢溃疡患者外周动脉疾病的自动化设备:证据综合和成本效益分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Aug;28(37):1-158. doi: 10.3310/TWCG3912.

本文引用的文献

1
Investing in U.S. forests to mitigate climate change.投资美国森林以缓解气候变化。
Carbon Balance Manag. 2025 Mar 10;20(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s13021-025-00292-6.
2
Half of land use carbon emissions in Southeast Asia can be mitigated through peat swamp forest and mangrove conservation and restoration.东南亚一半的土地利用碳排放可通过泥炭沼泽森林和红树林的保护与恢复来缓解。
Nat Commun. 2025 Jan 28;16(1):740. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-55892-0.
3
The effect of carbon fertilization on naturally regenerated and planted US forests.施碳对美国自然再生林和人工林的影响。
Nat Commun. 2022 Sep 19;13(1):5490. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-33196-x.
4
Updated nationally determined contributions collectively raise ambition levels but need strengthening further to keep Paris goals within reach.更新后的国家自主贡献总体上提高了目标水平,但仍需进一步加强,以使《巴黎协定》目标触手可及。
Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang. 2022;27(6):33. doi: 10.1007/s11027-022-10008-7. Epub 2022 Jun 21.
5
Future land-use competition constrains natural climate solutions.未来土地利用竞争制约自然气候解决方案。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Sep 10;838(Pt 3):156409. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156409. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
6
Russian forest sequesters substantially more carbon than previously reported.俄罗斯森林吸收的碳比此前报道的要多得多。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 17;11(1):12825. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-92152-9.
7
The economic costs of planting, preserving, and managing the world's forests to mitigate climate change.为缓解气候变化而种植、保护和管理世界森林的经济成本。
Nat Commun. 2020 Dec 1;11(1):5946. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19578-z.
8
The Influence of Parametric Uncertainty on Projections of Forest Land Use, Carbon, and Markets.参数不确定性对林地利用、碳和市场预测的影响。
J For Econ. 2019 Aug 7;34:129-158. doi: 10.1561/112.00000445.
9
Will U.S. Forests Continue to Be a Carbon Sink?美国森林会继续成为碳汇吗?
Land Econ. 2018 Feb 1;94:97-113. doi: 10.3368/le.94.1.97.
10
Forests: Carbon sequestration, biomass energy, or both?森林:碳封存、生物质能源,还是两者兼有?
Sci Adv. 2020 Mar 25;6(13):eaay6792. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aay6792. eCollection 2020 Mar.