• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

TikTok上关于高血压的短视频的质量和可靠性:一项横断面研究。

The quality and reliability of short videos about hypertension on TikTok: a cross-sectional study.

作者信息

Wu Jiabei, Wu Guiping, Che Xiaowen, Guo Jinli

机构信息

Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.

The Fifth Clinical Medical College of Shanxi Medical University (Shanxi Provincial People's Hospital), Taiyuan, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 11;15(1):25042. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-08680-1.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-08680-1
PMID:40646027
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12254506/
Abstract

Hypertension is a major global health risk, and social media platforms like TikTok play an increasing role in public health communication. This study evaluates the quality of hypertension-related videos on TikTok and examines the relationship between content quality and user engagement. A systematic keyword search identified hypertension-related videos published before February 25, 2025. After applying exclusion criteria, 139 videos were analyzed. Video quality was assessed using the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, the Global Quality Scale (GQS), and the modified DISCERN (mDISCERN) instrument. Engagement metrics (likes, comments, shares, and collections) were recorded, and Spearman's correlation and linear regression analyses explored associations between quality and engagement. These videos accumulated 7190634 likes, 3608023 collections, 247602 comments, and 3252697 shares. Most (85.6%, n = 119) were uploaded by health professionals. The most common JAMA score was 2 (74.8%), while the mean GQS score was 3, with 36.7% of videos receiving this rating. The mDISCERN score was most frequently 2 (71.2%). Video duration correlated with JAMA (β = 0.235, p < 0.05), mDISCERN (β = 0.190, p < 0.05), and GQS scores (β = 0.410, p < 0.001). Likes also correlated with JAMA (β = 0.661, p < 0.001), mDISCERN (β = 0.500, p < 0.05), and GQS scores (β = 0.815, p < 0.001). Comments negatively affected GQS scores (β = -0.574, p < 0.05). TikTok is a valuable platform for hypertension education, but content quality is moderate. Extending video duration, improving rigor, and enhancing review mechanisms may improve hypertension-related health communication.

摘要

高血压是全球主要的健康风险,而TikTok等社交媒体平台在公共卫生传播中发挥着越来越重要的作用。本研究评估了TikTok上与高血压相关视频的质量,并考察了内容质量与用户参与度之间的关系。通过系统的关键词搜索,确定了在2025年2月25日之前发布的与高血压相关的视频。应用排除标准后,对139个视频进行了分析。使用美国医学会杂志(JAMA)基准标准、全球质量量表(GQS)和改良的辨别工具(mDISCERN)对视频质量进行评估。记录参与度指标(点赞、评论、分享和收藏),并通过斯皮尔曼相关性分析和线性回归分析探究质量与参与度之间的关联。这些视频累计获得7190634个赞、3608023次收藏、247602条评论和3252697次分享。大多数(85.6%,n = 119)视频由健康专业人员上传。最常见的JAMA评分为2(74.8%),而GQS平均评分为3,36.7%的视频获得该评分。mDISCERN评分最常见为2(71.2%)。视频时长与JAMA评分(β = 0.235,p < 0.05)、mDISCERN评分(β = 0.190,p < 0.05)和GQS评分(β = 0.410,p < 0.001)相关。点赞数也与JAMA评分(β = 0.661,p < 0.001)、mDISCERN评分(β = 0.500,p < 0.05)和GQS评分(β = 0.815,p < 0.001)相关。评论对GQS评分有负面影响(β = -0.574,p < 0.05)。TikTok是高血压教育的一个有价值的平台,但内容质量中等。延长视频时长、提高严谨性和加强审核机制可能会改善与高血压相关的健康传播。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41b4/12254506/c5657d260a3d/41598_2025_8680_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41b4/12254506/bcfda22da614/41598_2025_8680_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41b4/12254506/4542785e99b9/41598_2025_8680_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41b4/12254506/2ed1abb55c0d/41598_2025_8680_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41b4/12254506/c5657d260a3d/41598_2025_8680_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41b4/12254506/bcfda22da614/41598_2025_8680_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41b4/12254506/4542785e99b9/41598_2025_8680_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41b4/12254506/2ed1abb55c0d/41598_2025_8680_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41b4/12254506/c5657d260a3d/41598_2025_8680_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The quality and reliability of short videos about hypertension on TikTok: a cross-sectional study.TikTok上关于高血压的短视频的质量和可靠性:一项横断面研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 11;15(1):25042. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-08680-1.
2
Information quality of videos related to esophageal cancer on tiktok, kwai, and bilibili: a cross-sectional study.抖音、快手和哔哩哔哩上与食管癌相关视频的信息质量:一项横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):2245. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23475-9.
3
Quality and content evaluation of thyroid eye disease treatment information on TikTok and Bilibili.TikTok和哔哩哔哩上甲状腺眼病治疗信息的质量与内容评估
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 11;15(1):25134. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-11147-y.
4
Assessing the Video Content Quality of TikTok and Bilibili as Health Information Sources for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Cross-Sectional Study.评估抖音和哔哩哔哩作为系统性红斑狼疮健康信息来源的视频内容质量:一项横断面研究。
Int J Rheum Dis. 2025 Jun;28(6):e70341. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.70341.
5
The quality and reliability of short videos about premature ovarian failure on Bilibili and TikTok: Cross-sectional study.哔哩哔哩和抖音上关于卵巢早衰短视频的质量与可靠性:横断面研究
Digit Health. 2025 Jun 17;11:20552076251351077. doi: 10.1177/20552076251351077. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
6
Assessing quality, reliability and accuracy of polycystic ovary syndrome-related content on TikTok: A video-based cross-sectional analysis.评估TikTok上多囊卵巢综合征相关内容的质量、可靠性和准确性:基于视频的横断面分析。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025 Feb 10. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.70007.
7
Aspergillosis on YouTube: Assessment of Quality and Reliability of Uploaded Videos.YouTube上的曲霉病:对上传视频质量和可靠性的评估。
Mycopathologia. 2025 Jun 23;190(4):57. doi: 10.1007/s11046-025-00967-1.
8
Search engines and short video apps as sources of information on acute pancreatitis in China: quality assessment and content assessment.中国搜索引擎和短视频应用作为急性胰腺炎信息来源的质量评估与内容评估
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 4;13:1578076. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1578076. eCollection 2025.
9
Evaluating the quality and reliability of youtube videos on Hirschsprung's disease: a comprehensive analysis for patients, parents and health professionals.评估YouTube上关于先天性巨结肠症视频的质量和可靠性:针对患者、家长及医疗专业人员的全面分析
Pediatr Surg Int. 2025 Jun 17;41(1):173. doi: 10.1007/s00383-025-06064-0.
10
The Quality of Short Videos as a Source of Coronary Heart Disease Information on TikTok: Cross-Sectional Study.短视频质量作为 TikTok 冠心病信息来源的研究:横断面研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Sep 3;8:e51513. doi: 10.2196/51513.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality, Reliability and Accuracy of Hyperthyroidism-Related Content on Social Media Platform TikTok.社交媒体平台TikTok上与甲状腺功能亢进相关内容的质量、可靠性和准确性。
Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2025 Sep;8(5):e70105. doi: 10.1002/edm2.70105.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of the content and quality of schizophrenia on TikTok: a cross-sectional study.评估 TikTok 上的精神分裂症内容和质量:一项横断面研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 2;14(1):26448. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-75372-7.
2
Scrolling through adolescence: a systematic review of the impact of TikTok on adolescent mental health.审视青少年时期:对TikTok对青少年心理健康影响的系统评价
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2025 May;34(5):1511-1527. doi: 10.1007/s00787-024-02581-w. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
3
Non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (NHHR) and hypertension in American adults: a NHANES cross-sectional study.
美国成年人中非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇与高密度脂蛋白胆固醇比值(NHHR)和高血压:一项美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)横断面研究
Front Physiol. 2024 Aug 13;15:1398793. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1398793. eCollection 2024.
4
YouTube/ Bilibili/ TikTok videos as sources of medical information on laryngeal carcinoma: cross-sectional content analysis study.YouTube/ Bilibili/ TikTok 视频作为喉癌医学信息来源:横断面内容分析研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jun 14;24(1):1594. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19077-6.
5
Evaluation of TikTok videos on acute pancreatitis: content quality and reliability analysis.抖音上关于急性胰腺炎的视频评估:内容质量与可靠性分析
BMC Public Health. 2024 May 2;24(1):1216. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18708-2.
6
Quality assessment of health science-related short videos on TikTok: A scoping review.标题:评估 TikTok 上与健康科学相关的短视频质量:范围综述
Int J Med Inform. 2024 Jun;186:105426. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105426. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
7
TikTok content as a source of health education regarding epicondylitis: a content analysis.TikTok 内容作为网球肘健康教育的来源:内容分析。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2024 Mar 23;25(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s10195-024-00757-3.
8
Quality and Reliability of Liver Cancer-Related Short Chinese Videos on TikTok and Bilibili: Cross-Sectional Content Analysis Study.肝癌相关短视频在 TikTok 和 Bilibili 上的质量与可靠性:一项横断面内容分析研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jul 5;25:e47210. doi: 10.2196/47210.
9
Promotion of E-Cigarettes on TikTok and Regulatory Considerations.TikTok 上电子烟的推广及监管考量。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 May 9;20(10):5761. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20105761.
10
Social Media Role and Its Impact on Public Health: A Narrative Review.社交媒体的作用及其对公众健康的影响:一项叙述性综述
Cureus. 2023 Jan 13;15(1):e33737. doi: 10.7759/cureus.33737. eCollection 2023 Jan.