Collaboration for Evidence, Research and Impact in Public Health, School of Population Health, Curtin University, Kent Street, Perth, WA 6102, Australia.
Internet Studies, School of Media, Creative Arts and Social Inquiry, Curtin University, Kent Street, Perth, WA 6102, Australia.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 May 9;20(10):5761. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20105761.
E-cigarettes are promoted extensively on TikTok and other social media platforms. Platform policies to restrict e-cigarette promotion seem insufficient and are poorly enforced. This paper aims to understand how e-cigarettes are being promoted on TikTok and provide insights into the effectiveness of current TikTok policies. Seven popular hashtag-based keywords were used to identify TikTok accounts and associated videos related to e-cigarettes. Posts were independently coded by two trained coders. Collectively, the 264 videos received 2,470,373 views, 166,462 likes and 3426 comments. The overwhelming majority of videos (97.7%) portrayed e-cigarettes positively, and these posts received 98.7% of the total views and 98.2% of the total likes. A total of 69 posts (26.1%) clearly violated TikTok's own content policy. The findings of the current study suggest that a variety of predominantly pro-vaping content is available on TikTok. Current policies and moderation processes appear to be insufficient in restricting the spread of pro-e-cigarette content on TikTok, putting predominantly young users at potential risk of e-cigarette use.
电子烟在 TikTok 和其他社交媒体平台上广泛推广。平台限制电子烟推广的政策似乎不够充分,也执行不力。本文旨在了解电子烟在 TikTok 上的推广方式,并深入了解当前 TikTok 政策的有效性。使用七个基于流行标签的关键词来识别与电子烟相关的 TikTok 账户和相关视频。由两名受过培训的编码员独立对帖子进行编码。这 264 个视频共获得了 2470373 次观看、166462 个赞和 3426 条评论。绝大多数视频(97.7%)对电子烟的评价是正面的,这些帖子获得了总观看次数的 98.7%和总赞的 98.2%。共有 69 个帖子(26.1%)明显违反了 TikTok 自己的内容政策。本研究的结果表明,TikTok 上有各种各样的主要支持吸电子烟的内容。当前的政策和监管程序似乎不足以限制 TikTok 上支持电子烟内容的传播,这使主要是年轻的用户面临电子烟使用的潜在风险。