• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

TikTok和哔哩哔哩上甲状腺眼病治疗信息的质量与内容评估

Quality and content evaluation of thyroid eye disease treatment information on TikTok and Bilibili.

作者信息

Wang Haisheng, Zhang Huahong, Cao Jiamin, Zhang Feng, Xiong Wei

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, No. 138 Tongzipo Road, Yuelu District, Changsha, 410013, Hunan, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 11;15(1):25134. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-11147-y.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-11147-y
PMID:40646154
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12254225/
Abstract

Thyroid eye disease (TED) is an autoimmune condition that commonly impacts patients' visual function, appearance, and psychological well-being. Challenges in TED management include low early detection rates and large variation in treatment response. Video platforms like TikTok and Bilibili are increasingly utilized for health information dissemination, yet the quality of TED treatment content on these platforms varies significantly. This cross-sectional study collected videos on "" from TikTok and Bilibili in March 2025. After applying exclusion criteria, 152 videos (89 from TikTok, 63 from Bilibili) were analyzed. Quality, reliability, and educational value were assessed using the Global Quality Score (GQS), modified DISCERN (mDISCERN), Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT), and Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria. Additionally, the study analyzed video content integrity, uploader identity, and the correlation with user interaction data. TikTok videos scored higher in quality (GQS: 3.00 ± 0.58; mDISCERN: 3.17 ± 0.73) compared to Bilibili (GQS: 2.65 ± 0.65; mDISCERN: 2.21 ± 0.88; p < 0.001). On Bilibili, 62% of videos were uploaded by Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) physicians, yet these scored lower in quality. Professionally uploaded content, particularly by ophthalmologists, outperformed non-professional videos (e.g., patient). However, the video interaction metrics uploaded by patients showed better performance. In terms of content, only 27% addressed staged treatment, and 11.8% mentioned risk factor control. Correlation analysis revealed strong correlations between interaction data, but interaction data have no correlation with GQS, mDISCERN, and PEMAT scores. Short video platforms exhibit a dual role in the dissemination of TED treatment information: enhancing public awareness of diseases through professional content while risking misinformation due to inadequate auditing. Recommended interventions include robust platform certification, active involvement of medical organizations in content creation, and public education on prioritizing verified sources.

摘要

甲状腺眼病(TED)是一种自身免疫性疾病,通常会影响患者的视觉功能、外观和心理健康。TED管理面临的挑战包括早期检测率低和治疗反应差异大。TikTok和哔哩哔哩等视频平台越来越多地被用于健康信息传播,但这些平台上TED治疗内容的质量差异很大。这项横断面研究于2025年3月收集了TikTok和哔哩哔哩上关于“”的视频。应用排除标准后,分析了152个视频(89个来自TikTok,63个来自哔哩哔哩)。使用全球质量评分(GQS)、改良的辨别力(mDISCERN)、患者教育材料评估工具(PEMAT)和美国医学会杂志(JAMA)基准标准评估质量、可靠性和教育价值。此外,该研究还分析了视频内容完整性、上传者身份以及与用户互动数据的相关性。与哔哩哔哩(GQS:2.65±0.65;mDISCERN:2.21±0.88;p<0.001)相比,TikTok视频在质量方面得分更高(GQS:3.00±0.58;mDISCERN:3.17±0.73)。在哔哩哔哩上,62%的视频由中医医生上传,但这些视频的质量得分较低。专业上传的内容,尤其是眼科医生上传的内容,表现优于非专业视频(如患者上传的视频)。然而,患者上传的视频互动指标表现更好。在内容方面,只有27%的视频涉及分期治疗问题,11.8%的视频提到了危险因素控制。相关性分析显示互动数据之间存在强相关性,但互动数据与GQS、mDISCERN和PEMAT评分无关。短视频平台在TED治疗信息传播中发挥着双重作用:通过专业内容提高公众对疾病的认识,同时由于审核不足存在错误信息传播的风险。推荐的干预措施包括强大的平台认证、医疗组织积极参与内容创作以及对优先选择经过验证的信息来源进行公众教育。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6c4/12254225/7f8d415c3cf9/41598_2025_11147_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6c4/12254225/e3b459a248ac/41598_2025_11147_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6c4/12254225/6f0a7b2e5fe6/41598_2025_11147_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6c4/12254225/3700c503b83f/41598_2025_11147_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6c4/12254225/f10a0e970eca/41598_2025_11147_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6c4/12254225/a257784cbe4d/41598_2025_11147_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6c4/12254225/7f8d415c3cf9/41598_2025_11147_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6c4/12254225/e3b459a248ac/41598_2025_11147_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6c4/12254225/6f0a7b2e5fe6/41598_2025_11147_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6c4/12254225/3700c503b83f/41598_2025_11147_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6c4/12254225/f10a0e970eca/41598_2025_11147_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6c4/12254225/a257784cbe4d/41598_2025_11147_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6c4/12254225/7f8d415c3cf9/41598_2025_11147_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Quality and content evaluation of thyroid eye disease treatment information on TikTok and Bilibili.TikTok和哔哩哔哩上甲状腺眼病治疗信息的质量与内容评估
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 11;15(1):25134. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-11147-y.
2
Information quality of videos related to esophageal cancer on tiktok, kwai, and bilibili: a cross-sectional study.抖音、快手和哔哩哔哩上与食管癌相关视频的信息质量:一项横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):2245. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23475-9.
3
Assessing the Video Content Quality of TikTok and Bilibili as Health Information Sources for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Cross-Sectional Study.评估抖音和哔哩哔哩作为系统性红斑狼疮健康信息来源的视频内容质量:一项横断面研究。
Int J Rheum Dis. 2025 Jun;28(6):e70341. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.70341.
4
The quality and reliability of short videos about premature ovarian failure on Bilibili and TikTok: Cross-sectional study.哔哩哔哩和抖音上关于卵巢早衰短视频的质量与可靠性:横断面研究
Digit Health. 2025 Jun 17;11:20552076251351077. doi: 10.1177/20552076251351077. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
5
YouTube and Bilibili as sources of information on oral cancer: cross-sectional content analysis study.YouTube和哔哩哔哩作为口腔癌信息来源:横断面内容分析研究
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):21671. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-02898-9.
6
The quality and reliability of short videos about hypertension on TikTok: a cross-sectional study.TikTok上关于高血压的短视频的质量和可靠性:一项横断面研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 11;15(1):25042. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-08680-1.
7
Assessing quality, reliability and accuracy of polycystic ovary syndrome-related content on TikTok: A video-based cross-sectional analysis.评估TikTok上多囊卵巢综合征相关内容的质量、可靠性和准确性:基于视频的横断面分析。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025 Feb 10. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.70007.
8
YouTube/ Bilibili/ TikTok videos as sources of medical information on laryngeal carcinoma: cross-sectional content analysis study.YouTube/ Bilibili/ TikTok 视频作为喉癌医学信息来源:横断面内容分析研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jun 14;24(1):1594. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19077-6.
9
Search engines and short video apps as sources of information on acute pancreatitis in China: quality assessment and content assessment.中国搜索引擎和短视频应用作为急性胰腺炎信息来源的质量评估与内容评估
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 4;13:1578076. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1578076. eCollection 2025.
10
Aspergillosis on YouTube: Assessment of Quality and Reliability of Uploaded Videos.YouTube上的曲霉病:对上传视频质量和可靠性的评估。
Mycopathologia. 2025 Jun 23;190(4):57. doi: 10.1007/s11046-025-00967-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Investigating factors influencing quality of life in thyroid eye disease: insight from machine learning approaches.探究影响甲状腺眼病患者生活质量的因素:机器学习方法的见解
Eur Thyroid J. 2025 Jan 9;14(1). doi: 10.1530/ETJ-24-0292. Print 2025 Feb 1.
2
TikTok as a potential patient educational tool for thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy: A cross-sectional study.TikTok作为甲状腺相关眼病的潜在患者教育工具:一项横断面研究。
Digit Health. 2024 Dec 12;10:20552076241304594. doi: 10.1177/20552076241304594. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
3
A Comprehensive Review of Thyroid Eye Disease Pathogenesis: From Immune Dysregulations to Novel Diagnostic and Therapeutic Approaches.
甲状腺眼病发病机制的全面综述:从免疫失调到新的诊断和治疗方法。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Oct 29;25(21):11628. doi: 10.3390/ijms252111628.
4
Evaluation of the information quality related to osteoporosis on TikTok.评估 TikTok 上与骨质疏松症相关的信息质量。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Oct 18;24(1):2880. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20375-2.
5
The quality and reliability of short videos about thyroid nodules on BiliBili and TikTok: Cross-sectional study.哔哩哔哩和抖音上关于甲状腺结节短视频的质量与可靠性:横断面研究
Digit Health. 2024 Oct 7;10:20552076241288831. doi: 10.1177/20552076241288831. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
6
Thyroid Eye Disease: Advancements in Orbital and Ocular Pathology Management.甲状腺眼病:眼眶及眼部病理学管理的进展
J Pers Med. 2024 Jul 22;14(7):776. doi: 10.3390/jpm14070776.
7
Graves disease: latest understanding of pathogenesis and treatment options.格雷夫斯病:发病机制和治疗选择的最新认识。
Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2024 Nov;20(11):647-660. doi: 10.1038/s41574-024-01016-5. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
8
Human papilloma virus (HPV)-related information acquisition and seeking behavior among infected women: A single center cross-sectional survey in Shanghai, China.中国上海某单中心横断面调查:感染女性人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)相关信息获取及需求行为研究
Glob Health Med. 2024 Jun 30;6(3):212-217. doi: 10.35772/ghm.2023.01100.
9
A multifactorial screening model based on the Graves ophthalmopathy quality of life scores in dysthyroid optic neuropathy.基于格雷夫斯眼病生活质量评分的甲状腺相关眼病伴发视神经病变的多因素筛查模型。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2024 Oct;262(10):3345-3353. doi: 10.1007/s00417-024-06556-0. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
10
TikTok as a Source of Health Information and Misinformation for Young Women in the United States: Survey Study.美国年轻女性将 TikTok 作为健康信息和错误信息的来源:调查研究。
JMIR Infodemiology. 2024 May 21;4:e54663. doi: 10.2196/54663.