• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Integrative transcriptomic and metabolomic analysis elucidates the vital pathways underlying the differences in salt stress responses between two chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) varieties.

作者信息

Duan Guangxia, Liang Chaoni, Su Jundong, Liang Yan, Li Wanming, Zhang Jinbo, Zhang Yigong

机构信息

Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Biological Resources and Genetic Engineering, College of Life Science and Technology, Xinjiang University, Urumqi, 830017, China.

Institute of Crop Sciences, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi, 830091, China.

出版信息

BMC Plant Biol. 2025 Jul 12;25(1):903. doi: 10.1186/s12870-025-06910-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12870-025-06910-2
PMID:40646445
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Integrative transcriptomic and metabolomic analysis elucidates the vital pathways underlying the differences in salt stress responses between two chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) varieties.整合转录组学和代谢组学分析揭示了两个鹰嘴豆（Cicer arietinum L.）品种在盐胁迫响应差异背后的关键途径。
BMC Plant Biol. 2025 Jul 12;25(1):903. doi: 10.1186/s12870-025-06910-2.
2
An overview of heat stress in Chickpea ( L.): effects, mechanisms and diverse molecular breeding approaches for enhancing resilience and productivity.鹰嘴豆（Cicer arietinum L.）热胁迫概述：效应、机制及增强抗逆性和生产力的多种分子育种方法
Mol Breed. 2025 Jan 21;45(2):18. doi: 10.1007/s11032-025-01538-4. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
Genome-wide identification and expression analyses of WRKY transcription factor family members from chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) reveal their role in abiotic stress-responses.鹰嘴豆（Cicer arietinum L.）WRKY转录因子家族成员的全基因组鉴定与表达分析揭示了它们在非生物胁迫响应中的作用。
Genes Genomics. 2019 Apr;41(4):467-481. doi: 10.1007/s13258-018-00780-9. Epub 2019 Jan 12.
4
The salt-responsive transcriptome of chickpea roots and nodules via deepSuperSAGE.通过 deepSuperSAGE 研究盐响应的鹰嘴豆根和根瘤转录组。
BMC Plant Biol. 2011 Feb 14;11:31. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-11-31.
5
Integrative Transcriptome and Metabolome Analysis Identifies Potential Pathways Associated with Cadmium Tolerance in Two Maize Inbred Lines.整合转录组和代谢组分析鉴定出与两个玉米自交系镉耐受性相关的潜在途径。
Plants (Basel). 2025 Jun 16;14(12):1853. doi: 10.3390/plants14121853.
6
Decoding the heat stress resilience in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): multi-trait analysis for genotypic adaptation.解析鹰嘴豆（Cicer arietinum L.）的热胁迫抗性：基因型适应性的多性状分析
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 11;15(1):25055. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-07573-7.
7
UPLC-HRMS-based untargeted metabolic profiling reveals changes in chickpea (Cicer arietinum) metabolome following long-term drought stress.基于 UPLC-HRMS 的非靶向代谢组学揭示了长期干旱胁迫对鹰嘴豆（Cicer arietinum）代谢组的影响。
Plant Cell Environ. 2019 Jan;42(1):115-132. doi: 10.1111/pce.13195. Epub 2018 Apr 15.
8
Comparative transcriptome analysis reveals molecular regulation of salt tolerance in two contrasting chickpea genotypes.比较转录组分析揭示了两种不同鹰嘴豆基因型耐盐性的分子调控机制。
Front Plant Sci. 2023 May 30;14:1191457. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1191457. eCollection 2023.
9
Joint analysis of transcriptome and metabolome on the accumulation mechanism of flavonoids in quinoa seedlings under flooding stress.转录组和代谢组联合分析水淹胁迫下藜麦幼苗类黄酮积累机制
BMC Plant Biol. 2025 Jul 3;25(1):852. doi: 10.1186/s12870-025-06867-2.
10
Genome-wide identification and analysis of SPL gene family in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.).菜豆基因组范围内 SPL 基因家族的鉴定和分析。
Protoplasma. 2024 Jul;261(4):799-818. doi: 10.1007/s00709-024-01936-z. Epub 2024 Feb 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Editing and genome-wide analysis upstream open reading frames contributes to enhancing salt tolerance in tomato.编辑和全基因组上游开放阅读框分析有助于提高番茄的耐盐性。
Plant Biotechnol J. 2024 Dec;22(12):3312-3325. doi: 10.1111/pbi.14450. Epub 2024 Aug 20.
2
Physiological adaptation of Cyperus esculentus L. seedlings to varying concentrations of saline-alkaline stress: Insights from photosynthetic performance.咸碱性胁迫下不同浓度对香蒲幼苗生理适应的影响：光合作用性能的启示。
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2024 Sep;214:108911. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2024.108911. Epub 2024 Jul 4.
3
OsJRL negatively regulates rice cold tolerance via interfering phenylalanine metabolism and flavonoid biosynthesis.
OsJRL 通过干扰苯丙氨酸代谢和类黄酮生物合成负调控水稻的耐寒性。
Plant Cell Environ. 2024 Nov;47(11):4071-4085. doi: 10.1111/pce.15005. Epub 2024 Jun 17.
4
Sensitivity and responses of chloroplasts to salt stress in plants.植物叶绿体对盐胁迫的敏感性及响应
Front Plant Sci. 2024 Apr 17;15:1374086. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1374086. eCollection 2024.
5
Effect of drought stress on the expression pattern of genes involved in ABA biosynthesis in Desi-type chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.).干旱胁迫对 Desi 型鹰嘴豆（Cicer arietinum L.）中参与 ABA 生物合成的基因表达模式的影响。
Mol Biol Rep. 2024 Mar 29;51(1):469. doi: 10.1007/s11033-024-09402-y.
6
OsBCAT2, a gene responsible for the degradation of branched-chain amino acids, positively regulates salt tolerance by promoting the synthesis of vitamin B5.OsBCAT2 是一个负责降解支链氨基酸的基因，它通过促进维生素 B5 的合成来正向调节盐胁迫耐受性。
New Phytol. 2024 Mar;241(6):2558-2574. doi: 10.1111/nph.19551. Epub 2024 Jan 23.
7
The ncRNAs Involved in the Regulation of Abiotic Stress-Induced Anthocyanin Biosynthesis in Plants.参与植物非生物胁迫诱导花青素生物合成调控的非编码RNA
Antioxidants (Basel). 2023 Dec 28;13(1):55. doi: 10.3390/antiox13010055.
8
Effect of melatonin foliar sprays on morphophysiological attributes, fruit yield and quality of Momordica charantia L. under salinity stress.褪黑素叶面喷施对盐胁迫下苦瓜形态生理特性、果实产量和品质的影响。
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2023 Dec;205:108194. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2023.108194. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
9
Metabolomic and transcriptomice analyses of flavonoid biosynthesis in apricot fruits.杏果实中黄酮类生物合成的代谢组学和转录组学分析
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Jul 18;14:1210309. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1210309. eCollection 2023.
10
Lipid Metabolomic and Transcriptomic Analyses Reveal That Phosphatidylcholine Enhanced the Resistance of Peach Seedlings to Salt Stress through Phosphatidic Acid.脂质代谢组学和转录组学分析表明，磷脂酰胆碱通过磷脂酸增强了桃幼苗的耐盐性。
J Agric Food Chem. 2023 Jun 14;71(23):8846-8858. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.3c01383. Epub 2023 Jun 1.