• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于扎根理论方法的新医学背景下医学教师教学学术能力指标体系研究

Research on the indicator system of scholarship of teaching and learning ability for medical teachers in the context of new medical science-based on the grounded theory method.

作者信息

Xu Juan, Xu Ning, Zhang Feng, Wang Huijuan, Li Hao, Yuan Li

机构信息

School of Basic Medical Sciences, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 211166, China.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jul 11;25(1):1040. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07612-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12909-025-07612-x
PMID:40646511
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12255139/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL) is one of the four types of scholarship proposed by Boyer, who emphasized that universities should approach teaching as scholarly work. Studies show that SoTL is an effective tool to improve teaching effectiveness and safeguard educational quality. Enhancing medical teachers' SoTL ability is crucial for improving medical education quality and cultivating innovative medical talents, which directly support New Medical Science construction and ensures the smooth implementation of the Healthy China strategy. However, systematic research on medical teachers' SoTL ability remains limited in China. This study aimed to construct an indicator system of SoTL ability for medical teachers to facilitate evaluation and improvement.

METHODS

Based on the Grounded Theory method, 20 teachers were interviewed and data were analyzed via NVivo11 to develop a preliminary indicator system. 19 experts then validated the indicator system through Delphi method consultations. SPSS 26.0 was employed to statistically analyze the data to finalize the indicator system of SoTL ability.

RESULTS

The second-round expert consultation achieved 100% response and validity rates. The expert authority coefficient (Cr = 0.88) and coordination coefficient of importance (W > 0.4, p-value < 0.05,) confirmed strong consensus. The final indicator system was constructed by retaining indicators with a mean score ≥ 4 and a coefficient of variation < 25%, comprising 5 primary indicators, 15 secondary indicators, and 31 tertiary indicators.

CONCLUSION

An indicator system of SoTL ability for medical teachers was constructed to provide theoretical and practical references for evaluating and exploring paths to enhance their SoTL ability.

摘要

背景

教学学术是博耶提出的四种学术类型之一,他强调大学应将教学视为学术工作。研究表明,教学学术是提高教学效果和保障教育质量的有效工具。提升医学教师的教学学术能力对于提高医学教育质量和培养创新型医学人才至关重要,这直接支撑新医学建设并确保健康中国战略的顺利实施。然而,我国对医学教师教学学术能力的系统研究仍然有限。本研究旨在构建医学教师教学学术能力指标体系,以促进评估和提升。

方法

基于扎根理论方法,对20名教师进行访谈,并通过NVivo11对数据进行分析,以建立初步指标体系。然后,19名专家通过德尔菲法咨询对该指标体系进行验证。使用SPSS 26.0对数据进行统计分析,以确定教学学术能力指标体系。

结果

第二轮专家咨询的回复率和有效率均达到100%。专家权威系数(Cr = 0.88)和重要性协调系数(W > 0.4,p值 < 0.05)证实了高度共识。最终指标体系通过保留平均得分≥4且变异系数<25%的指标构建而成,包括5个一级指标、15个二级指标和31个三级指标。

结论

构建了医学教师教学学术能力指标体系,为评估和探索提升其教学学术能力的途径提供理论和实践参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7be5/12255139/fa01429a6105/12909_2025_7612_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7be5/12255139/fa01429a6105/12909_2025_7612_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7be5/12255139/fa01429a6105/12909_2025_7612_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Research on the indicator system of scholarship of teaching and learning ability for medical teachers in the context of new medical science-based on the grounded theory method.基于扎根理论方法的新医学背景下医学教师教学学术能力指标体系研究
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jul 11;25(1):1040. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07612-x.
2
Exploring the effects of curiosity and anxiety on Mathematics teaching efficacy beliefs in primary school teachers.探究好奇心和焦虑对小学教师数学教学效能信念的影响。
BMC Psychol. 2025 Jul 1;13(1):665. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02940-5.
3
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
4
A systematic review of faculty development initiatives designed to improve teaching effectiveness in medical education: BEME Guide No. 8.旨在提高医学教育教学效果的教师发展举措的系统评价:BEME指南第8号
Med Teach. 2006 Sep;28(6):497-526. doi: 10.1080/01421590600902976.
5
Faculty development initiatives designed to promote leadership in medical education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 19.旨在促进医学教育领导力的教师发展计划。BEME 系统评价:BEME 指南第 19 号。
Med Teach. 2012;34(6):483-503. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.680937.
6
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
7
An Intervention to Support Higher Education Teachers' Teaching Processes and Well-Being: Protocol for an Intervention Study.一项支持高等教育教师教学过程与幸福感的干预措施:一项干预研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jun 25;14:e65428. doi: 10.2196/65428.
8
A Scoping Review of the Observed and Perceived Functional Impacts Associated With Language and Learning Disorders in School-Aged Children.一项关于学龄儿童语言和学习障碍相关的观察到的和感知到的功能影响的范围综述。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2025 Jul-Aug;60(4):e70086. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.70086.
9
Construction of an ethical competency evaluation system for clinical physicians in China.构建中国临床医师伦理能力评估体系。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):928. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07520-0.
10
Construction of a quality evaluation indicator system for extended care in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a cross-sectional study.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者延续性护理质量评价指标体系的构建:一项横断面研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 6;15(7):e086027. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086027.

本文引用的文献

1
Employing reflective practice to enhance student engagement.运用反思性实践提高学生参与度。
Med Educ. 2024 Nov;58(11):1267-1269. doi: 10.1111/medu.15473. Epub 2024 Jul 10.
2
Developing a framework for promoting interest and engagement of scholarship of teaching and learning for medical students.为医学生制定促进教与学学术研究兴趣和参与的框架。
Med Educ Online. 2024 Dec 31;29(1):2336332. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2024.2336332. Epub 2024 Apr 1.
3
Teaching Philosophy in a Teaching Portfolio: Domain Knowledge and Guidance.教学档案中的教学理念:专业知识与指导
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2023 Nov 8;14:1231-1248. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S428897. eCollection 2023.
4
The experiences of preparation and engagement of educators in teaching e-portfolio.教育工作者在教授电子档案袋方面的准备和参与经验。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Sep 18;23(1):674. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04642-1.
5
The quantified analysis of the correlation between medical humanities curriculums and medical students' performance.医学人文学课程与医学生表现之间相关性的量化分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Aug 11;23(1):571. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04073-y.
6
Motivation to teach and preparedness for teaching among preservice teachers in China: The effect of conscientiousness and constructivist teaching beliefs.中国职前教师的教学动机与教学准备:尽责性和建构主义教学信念的影响。
Front Psychol. 2023 Apr 6;14:1116321. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1116321. eCollection 2023.
7
Symposium: Better teaching through science: incorporating the scholarship of teaching & learning.研讨会:通过科学提高教学质量:融入教学学术。
Poult Sci. 2023 Jan;102(1):102234. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2022.102234. Epub 2022 Oct 21.
8
State of the science: Quality improvement of medical curricula-How should we approach it?科学现状:医学课程质量改进——我们应该如何着手?
Med Educ. 2023 Jan;57(1):49-56. doi: 10.1111/medu.14912. Epub 2022 Sep 4.
9
Realizing Promising Educational Practices in Academic Public Health: A Model for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.实现学术公共卫生领域有前景的教育实践:教学学术的典范。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jan 31;9:750682. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.750682. eCollection 2021.
10
An Integrative Review of Approaches Used to Assess Course Interventions.综合评估课程干预措施的方法述评。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2023 Jan;87(1):ajpe8896. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8896. Epub 2022 Jan 27.