Novellino Tommaso, Masciocchi Carlotta, Tudor Andrada Mihaela, Casà Calogero, Chiloiro Giuditta, Romano Angela, Damiani Andrea, Arcuri Giovanni, Gambacorta Maria Antonietta, Valentini Vincenzo
Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Centro di Medicina dell'Invecchiamento, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli-IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jul 3;17(13):2235. doi: 10.3390/cancers17132235.
The variability of cancers and medical big data can be addressed using artificial intelligence techniques. Artificial intelligence models can accept different input types, including images as well as other formats such as numerical data, predefined categories, and free text. Non-image sources are as important as images in clinical practice and the literature; nevertheless, the secondary literature tends to focus exclusively on image-based inputs. This article reviews such models, using non-image components as a use case in the context of rectal cancer. A literature search was conducted using PubMed and Scopus, without temporal limits and in English; for the secondary literature, appropriate filters were employed. We classified artificial intelligence models into three categories: image (image-based input), non-image (non-image input), and combined (hybrid input) models. Non-image models performed significantly well, supporting our hypothesis that disproportionate attention has been given to image-based models. Combined models frequently outperform their unimodal counterparts, in agreement with the literature. However, multicenter and externally validated studies assessing both non-image and combined models remain under-represented. To the best of our knowledge, no previous reviews have focused on non-image inputs, either alone or in combination with images. Non-image components require substantial attention in both research and clinical practice. The importance of multimodality-extending beyond images-is particularly relevant in the context of rectal cancer and potentially other pathologies.
癌症的变异性和医学大数据可以通过人工智能技术来解决。人工智能模型可以接受不同类型的输入,包括图像以及其他格式,如数值数据、预定义类别和自由文本。在临床实践和文献中,非图像来源与图像同样重要;然而,二次文献往往只专注于基于图像的输入。本文以直肠癌为例,回顾了使用非图像组件的此类模型。使用PubMed和Scopus进行了文献检索,无时间限制且检索语言为英语;对于二次文献,采用了适当的筛选条件。我们将人工智能模型分为三类:图像(基于图像的输入)、非图像(非图像输入)和组合(混合输入)模型。非图像模型表现出色,支持了我们的假设,即基于图像的模型受到了过多关注。与文献一致,组合模型通常优于单峰模型。然而,评估非图像和组合模型的多中心和外部验证研究仍然较少。据我们所知,以前没有综述专注于非图像输入,无论是单独的还是与图像结合的。非图像组件在研究和临床实践中都需要大量关注。在直肠癌以及其他潜在病理情况下,超越图像的多模态的重要性尤为突出。