• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结合死亡率预测模型和出院时间预测模型以改善重症监护病房的预后评估

Combining Predictive Models of Mortality and Time-to-Discharge for Improved Outcome Assessment in Intensive Care Units.

作者信息

Pardo Àlex, Gómez Josep, Berrueta Julen, García Alejandro, Manrique Sara, Rodríguez Alejandro, Bodí María

机构信息

Department of Medicine and Surgery, Rovira Virgili University, 43201 Tarragona, Spain.

Critical Care Department, Joan XXIII University Hospital, 43005 Tarragona, Spain.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 25;14(13):4515. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134515.

DOI:10.3390/jcm14134515
PMID:40648890
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12249738/
Abstract

The Patient Outcome Assessment and Decision Support (PADS) model is a real-time framework designed to predict both mortality and the likelihood of discharge within 48 h in critically ill patients. By combining these predictions, PADS enables clinically meaningful stratification of patient trajectories, supporting bedside decision-making and the planning of critical care resources such as nursing allocation and surgical scheduling. PADS integrates routinely collected clinical data: SOFA variables, age, gender, admission type, and comorbidities. It consists of two Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) neural networks-one predicting the probability of death and the other the probability of discharge within 48 h. The combination places each patient into one of four states: alive/discharged within 48 h, alive/not discharged, dead within 48 h, or dead later. The model was trained using MIMIC-IV data, emphasizing ease of implementation in units with electronic health records. Out of the 76,540 stays present in MIMIC-IV (53,150 patients), 32,875 (25,555 patients) were used after excluding those with short stays (<48 h) or life support treatment limitations. The code is open, well-documented, and designed for reproducibility and external validation. The model achieved strong performance: AUCROC of 0.94 (±0.03) for mortality and 0.89 (±0.07) for discharge on training data, and 0.87 (±0.02) and 0.88 (±0.03), respectively, on the test set. As a comparison, benchmark models obtain worse accuracy (-13.4% for APS III, -19% for OASIS, and -7.4% for SAPS II). Predictions are visualized in an intuitive format to support clinical interpretation. PADS offers a transparent, reproducible, and practical tool that supports both individual patient care and the strategic organization of intensive care resources by anticipating short-term outcomes.

摘要

患者预后评估与决策支持(PADS)模型是一个实时框架,旨在预测危重症患者的死亡率和48小时内出院的可能性。通过结合这些预测结果,PADS能够对患者的病程进行具有临床意义的分层,为床边决策以及诸如护理分配和手术安排等重症监护资源的规划提供支持。PADS整合了常规收集的临床数据:序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)变量、年龄、性别、入院类型和合并症。它由两个长短期记忆(LSTM)神经网络组成,一个预测死亡概率,另一个预测48小时内出院概率。综合这两个概率可将每个患者归入四种状态之一:48小时内存活/出院、存活/未出院、48小时内死亡或之后死亡。该模型使用多中心重症医学信息数据库(MIMIC-IV)数据进行训练,强调在配备电子健康记录的科室易于实施。在MIMIC-IV中的七万六千五百四十次住院病例(五万三千一百五十名患者)中,排除住院时间短(<48小时)或有生命支持治疗限制的病例后,使用了三万二千八百七十五次住院病例(二万五千五百五十五名患者)。该模型代码开放、文档完善,设计用于可重复性研究和外部验证。该模型表现出色:训练数据上死亡率的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUCROC)为0.94(±0.03),出院概率的AUCROC为0.89(±0.07),测试集上分别为0.87(±0.02)和0.88(±0.03)。作为对比,基准模型的准确率更低(急性生理和慢性健康状况评分系统III(APS III)低13.4%,器官功能障碍评估系统(OASIS)低19%,简化急性生理学评分系统II(SAPS II)低7.4%)。预测结果以直观的形式呈现,以支持临床解读。PADS提供了一个透明、可重复且实用的工具,通过预测短期预后,既支持个体患者护理,也支持重症监护资源的战略组织。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58b6/12249738/fea699c56cd6/jcm-14-04515-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58b6/12249738/cfd685afbd37/jcm-14-04515-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58b6/12249738/e4607a126553/jcm-14-04515-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58b6/12249738/28632947b78b/jcm-14-04515-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58b6/12249738/1c10277430a2/jcm-14-04515-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58b6/12249738/fb70a5b9cb3c/jcm-14-04515-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58b6/12249738/046578881093/jcm-14-04515-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58b6/12249738/ec1fc461d8e1/jcm-14-04515-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58b6/12249738/dd14641a3a81/jcm-14-04515-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58b6/12249738/fea699c56cd6/jcm-14-04515-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58b6/12249738/cfd685afbd37/jcm-14-04515-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58b6/12249738/e4607a126553/jcm-14-04515-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58b6/12249738/28632947b78b/jcm-14-04515-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58b6/12249738/1c10277430a2/jcm-14-04515-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58b6/12249738/fb70a5b9cb3c/jcm-14-04515-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58b6/12249738/046578881093/jcm-14-04515-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58b6/12249738/ec1fc461d8e1/jcm-14-04515-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58b6/12249738/dd14641a3a81/jcm-14-04515-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58b6/12249738/fea699c56cd6/jcm-14-04515-g009.jpg

相似文献

1
Combining Predictive Models of Mortality and Time-to-Discharge for Improved Outcome Assessment in Intensive Care Units.结合死亡率预测模型和出院时间预测模型以改善重症监护病房的预后评估
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 25;14(13):4515. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134515.
2
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
3
Are Current Survival Prediction Tools Useful When Treating Subsequent Skeletal-related Events From Bone Metastases?当前的生存预测工具在治疗骨转移后的骨骼相关事件时有用吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1710-1721. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003030. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
4
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
5
Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome全身炎症反应综合征
6
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
7
Development and Validation of a Convolutional Neural Network Model to Predict a Pathologic Fracture in the Proximal Femur Using Abdomen and Pelvis CT Images of Patients With Advanced Cancer.利用晚期癌症患者腹部和骨盆 CT 图像建立卷积神经网络模型预测股骨近端病理性骨折的研究
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Nov 1;481(11):2247-2256. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002771. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
8
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
9
Automated monitoring compared to standard care for the early detection of sepsis in critically ill patients.与标准护理相比,自动监测用于危重症患者脓毒症的早期检测
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 25;6(6):CD012404. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012404.pub2.
10
Prediction cardiovascular deterioration in a paediatric intensive care unit (PicEWS): a machine learning modelling study of routinely collected health-care data.儿科重症监护病房心血管恶化的预测(PicEWS):一项基于常规收集的医疗数据的机器学习建模研究
EClinicalMedicine. 2025 Jun 18;85:103255. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103255. eCollection 2025 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
Artificial Intelligence In Health And Health Care: Priorities For Action.健康与医疗保健领域的人工智能:行动优先事项。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2025 Feb;44(2):163-170. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2024.01003. Epub 2025 Jan 22.
2
Predicting individual patient and hospital-level discharge using machine learning.使用机器学习预测个体患者和医院层面的出院情况。
Commun Med (Lond). 2024 Nov 18;4(1):236. doi: 10.1038/s43856-024-00673-x.
3
Real-time machine learning model to predict short-term mortality in critically ill patients: development and international validation.
实时机器学习模型预测危重症患者短期死亡率:开发和国际验证。
Crit Care. 2024 Mar 14;28(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-04866-7.
4
Improving Mortality Risk Prediction with Routine Clinical Data: A Practical Machine Learning Model Based on eICU Patients.利用常规临床数据改善死亡风险预测:基于电子重症监护病房(eICU)患者的实用机器学习模型
Int J Gen Med. 2023 Jul 26;16:3151-3161. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S391423. eCollection 2023.
5
Applying Machine Learning to Healthcare Operations Management: CNN-Based Model for Malaria Diagnosis.将机器学习应用于医疗保健运营管理:基于卷积神经网络的疟疾诊断模型。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jun 16;11(12):1779. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11121779.
6
Bringing the Promise of Artificial Intelligence to Critical Care: What the Experience With Sepsis Analytics Can Teach Us.将人工智能的前景带入重症监护:脓毒症分析的经验能给我们带来什么启示。
Crit Care Med. 2023 Aug 1;51(8):985-991. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005894. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
7
DECAF: An interpretable deep cascading framework for ICU mortality prediction.DECAF:一种用于 ICU 死亡率预测的可解释深度级联框架。
Artif Intell Med. 2023 Apr;138:102437. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2022.102437. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
8
MIMIC-IV, a freely accessible electronic health record dataset.MIMIC-IV,一个可自由访问的电子健康记录数据集。
Sci Data. 2023 Jan 3;10(1):1. doi: 10.1038/s41597-022-01899-x.
9
An explainable knowledge distillation method with XGBoost for ICU mortality prediction.一种基于XGBoost的用于重症监护病房死亡率预测的可解释知识蒸馏方法。
Comput Biol Med. 2023 Jan;152:106466. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.106466. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
10
Predicting length of stay in ICU and mortality with temporal dilated separable convolution and context-aware feature fusion.基于时间扩展可分离卷积和上下文感知特征融合预测 ICU 住院时间和死亡率。
Comput Biol Med. 2022 Dec;151(Pt A):106278. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.106278. Epub 2022 Nov 9.