• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实时机器学习模型预测危重症患者短期死亡率:开发和国际验证。

Real-time machine learning model to predict short-term mortality in critically ill patients: development and international validation.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.

VUNO, 479 Gangnam-Daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul, 06541, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Crit Care. 2024 Mar 14;28(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-04866-7.

DOI:10.1186/s13054-024-04866-7
PMID:38486247
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10938661/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A real-time model for predicting short-term mortality in critically ill patients is needed to identify patients at imminent risk. However, the performance of the model needs to be validated in various clinical settings and ethnicities before its clinical application. In this study, we aim to develop an ensemble machine learning model using routinely measured clinical variables at a single academic institution in South Korea.

METHODS

We developed an ensemble model using deep learning and light gradient boosting machine models. Internal validation was performed using the last two years of the internal cohort dataset, collected from a single academic hospital in South Korea between 2007 and 2021. External validation was performed using the full Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC), eICU-Collaborative Research Database (eICU-CRD), and Amsterdam University Medical Center database (AmsterdamUMCdb) data. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was calculated and compared to that for the National Early Warning Score (NEWS).

RESULTS

The developed model (iMORS) demonstrated high predictive performance with an internal AUROC of 0.964 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.963-0.965) and external AUROCs of 0.890 (95% CI 0.889-0.891) for MIMIC, 0.886 (95% CI 0.885-0.887) for eICU-CRD, and 0.870 (95% CI 0.868-0.873) for AmsterdamUMCdb. The model outperformed the NEWS with higher AUROCs in the internal and external validation (0.866 for the internal, 0.746 for MIMIC, 0.798 for eICU-CRD, and 0.819 for AmsterdamUMCdb; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our real-time machine learning model to predict short-term mortality in critically ill patients showed excellent performance in both internal and external validations. This model could be a useful decision-support tool in the intensive care units to assist clinicians.

摘要

背景

需要建立一个实时模型来预测危重症患者的短期死亡率,以便识别即将面临风险的患者。然而,在将该模型应用于临床之前,需要在不同的临床环境和种族中对其性能进行验证。本研究旨在使用韩国某一学术机构的常规测量临床变量来开发一个集成机器学习模型。

方法

我们使用深度学习和轻梯度提升机模型来开发集成模型。使用内部队列数据集的最后两年进行内部验证,该数据集是在 2007 年至 2021 年间从韩国的一家学术医院收集的。使用全医疗信息监护病房(MIMIC)、重症监护电子病历协作研究数据库(eICU-CRD)和阿姆斯特丹大学医学中心数据库(AmsterdamUMCdb)进行外部验证。计算了接受者操作特征曲线下的面积(AUROC)并与国家早期预警评分(NEWS)进行了比较。

结果

开发的模型(iMORS)表现出较高的预测性能,内部 AUROC 为 0.964(95%置信区间 0.963-0.965),外部 MIMIC 的 AUROC 为 0.890(95%置信区间 0.889-0.891),eICU-CRD 的 AUROC 为 0.886(95%置信区间 0.885-0.887),AmsterdamUMCdb 的 AUROC 为 0.870(95%置信区间 0.868-0.873)。该模型在内部和外部验证中均优于 NEWS,AUROC 更高(内部为 0.866,MIMIC 为 0.746,eICU-CRD 为 0.798,AmsterdamUMCdb 为 0.819;p<0.001)。

结论

我们开发的用于预测危重症患者短期死亡率的实时机器学习模型在内部和外部验证中表现出优异的性能。该模型可为重症监护病房的临床医生提供一种有用的决策支持工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7289/10938661/f39296b45a1c/13054_2024_4866_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7289/10938661/2106954d769c/13054_2024_4866_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7289/10938661/ecca71d73180/13054_2024_4866_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7289/10938661/f39296b45a1c/13054_2024_4866_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7289/10938661/2106954d769c/13054_2024_4866_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7289/10938661/ecca71d73180/13054_2024_4866_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7289/10938661/f39296b45a1c/13054_2024_4866_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Real-time machine learning model to predict short-term mortality in critically ill patients: development and international validation.实时机器学习模型预测危重症患者短期死亡率:开发和国际验证。
Crit Care. 2024 Mar 14;28(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-04866-7.
2
A machine learning-based prediction model for in-hospital mortality among critically ill patients with hip fracture: An internal and external validated study.基于机器学习的危重症髋部骨折患者院内死亡率预测模型:内部和外部验证研究。
Injury. 2023 Feb;54(2):636-644. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.11.031. Epub 2022 Nov 12.
3
Illness severity assessment of older adults in critical illness using machine learning (ELDER-ICU): an international multicentre study with subgroup bias evaluation.使用机器学习评估危重症老年患者的疾病严重程度(ELDER-ICU):一项具有亚组偏倚评估的国际多中心研究。
Lancet Digit Health. 2023 Oct;5(10):e657-e667. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00128-0. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
4
A time-incorporated SOFA score-based machine learning model for predicting mortality in critically ill patients: A multicenter, real-world study.一种基于时间整合的序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分的机器学习模型用于预测危重症患者的死亡率:一项多中心、真实世界研究。
Int J Med Inform. 2022 Jul;163:104776. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104776. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
5
Interpretable machine learning for 28-day all-cause in-hospital mortality prediction in critically ill patients with heart failure combined with hypertension: A retrospective cohort study based on medical information mart for intensive care database-IV and eICU databases.用于预测心力衰竭合并高血压重症患者28天全因院内死亡率的可解释机器学习:一项基于重症监护医学信息集市数据库-IV和电子重症监护病房数据库的回顾性队列研究
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Oct 12;9:994359. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.994359. eCollection 2022.
6
Early Prediction of Cardiac Arrest in the Intensive Care Unit Using Explainable Machine Learning: Retrospective Study.使用可解释机器学习对重症监护病房中的心脏骤停进行早期预测:回顾性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Sep 17;26:e62890. doi: 10.2196/62890.
7
Machine Learning for Predicting Risk and Prognosis of Acute Kidney Disease in Critically Ill Elderly Patients During Hospitalization: Internet-Based and Interpretable Model Study.基于互联网的可解释模型研究:机器学习在预测住院期间危重症老年患者急性肾损伤风险和预后中的应用。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 May 1;26:e51354. doi: 10.2196/51354.
8
Development and validation a nomogram prediction model for early diagnosis of bloodstream infections in the intensive care unit.开发和验证 ICU 血流感染早期诊断的列线图预测模型。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2024 Mar 4;14:1348896. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1348896. eCollection 2024.
9
Machine learning for prediction of in-hospital mortality in lung cancer patients admitted to intensive care unit.机器学习在预测 ICU 收治的肺癌患者院内死亡率中的应用。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 26;18(1):e0280606. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280606. eCollection 2023.
10
Interpretable machine learning model for early prediction of 28-day mortality in ICU patients with sepsis-induced coagulopathy: development and validation.用于脓毒症诱导性凝血病 ICU 患者 28 天死亡率早期预测的可解释机器学习模型:开发与验证。
Eur J Med Res. 2024 Jan 3;29(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01593-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Combining Predictive Models of Mortality and Time-to-Discharge for Improved Outcome Assessment in Intensive Care Units.结合死亡率预测模型和出院时间预测模型以改善重症监护病房的预后评估
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 25;14(13):4515. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134515.
2
Invasive and non-invasive monitoring in the ICU.重症监护病房中的有创和无创监测
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2025 Apr 14;10(Suppl 1):e001780. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2025-001780. eCollection 2025.
3
Explainable machine learning model for prediction of 28-day all-cause mortality in immunocompromised patients in the intensive care unit: a retrospective cohort study based on MIMIC-IV database.

本文引用的文献

1
Considering Biased Data as Informative Artifacts in AI-Assisted Health Care.将有偏差的数据视为人工智能辅助医疗保健中的信息性工件。
N Engl J Med. 2023 Aug 31;389(9):833-838. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra2214964.
2
Predicting ICU admission and death in the Emergency Department: A comparison of six early warning scores.预测急诊 ICU 收治和死亡:六种早期预警评分的比较。
Resuscitation. 2023 Sep;190:109876. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2023.109876. Epub 2023 Jun 17.
3
External Validation of Mortality Prediction Models for Critical Illness Reveals Preserved Discrimination but Poor Calibration.
用于预测重症监护病房免疫功能低下患者28天全因死亡率的可解释机器学习模型:一项基于MIMIC-IV数据库的回顾性队列研究
Eur J Med Res. 2025 May 3;30(1):358. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-02622-3.
4
Timing of kidney replacement therapy in critically ill patients: A call to shift the paradigm in the era of artificial intelligence.危重症患者肾脏替代治疗的时机:呼吁在人工智能时代转变范式。
Sci Prog. 2025 Apr-Jun;108(2):368504251338927. doi: 10.1177/00368504251338927. Epub 2025 Apr 24.
5
Development and Validation of a Dynamic Real-Time Risk Prediction Model for Intensive Care Units Patients Based on Longitudinal Irregular Data: Multicenter Retrospective Study.基于纵向不规则数据的重症监护病房患者动态实时风险预测模型的开发与验证:多中心回顾性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 23;27:e69293. doi: 10.2196/69293.
6
Machine learning-based scoring model for predicting mortality in ICU-admitted ischemic stroke patients with moderate to severe consciousness disorders.基于机器学习的评分模型,用于预测入住重症监护病房的中度至重度意识障碍缺血性中风患者的死亡率。
Front Neurol. 2025 Mar 18;16:1534961. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1534961. eCollection 2025.
7
Multicenter validation of a machine learning model to predict intensive care unit readmission within 48 hours after discharge.用于预测出院后48小时内重症监护病房再入院的机器学习模型的多中心验证
EClinicalMedicine. 2025 Feb 13;81:103112. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103112. eCollection 2025 Mar.
8
[Ethical boundary decisions in intensive care medicine].[重症监护医学中的伦理边界决策]
Inn Med (Heidelb). 2024 Oct;65(10):967-975. doi: 10.1007/s00108-024-01781-5. Epub 2024 Sep 23.
9
The role of Open Access Data in democratizing healthcare AI: A pathway to research enhancement, patient well-being and treatment equity in Andalusia, Spain.开放获取数据在医疗保健人工智能民主化中的作用:西班牙安达卢西亚增强研究、促进患者福祉和实现治疗公平的途径。
PLOS Digit Health. 2024 Sep 16;3(9):e0000599. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000599. eCollection 2024 Sep.
危重病患者死亡率预测模型的外部验证显示出良好的区分度但差的校准度。
Crit Care Med. 2023 Jan 1;51(1):80-90. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005712. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
4
Prediction algorithm for ICU mortality and length of stay using machine learning.使用机器学习算法预测 ICU 死亡率和住院时间。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 28;12(1):12912. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-17091-5.
5
Artificial intelligence in perioperative medicine: a narrative review.人工智能在围手术期医学中的应用:叙述性综述。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2022 Jun;75(3):202-215. doi: 10.4097/kja.22157. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
6
A Clinically Practical and Interpretable Deep Model for ICU Mortality Prediction with External Validation.临床实用且可解释的 ICU 死亡率预测深度学习模型及其外部验证。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2021 Jan 25;2020:629-637. eCollection 2020.
7
A multicentre validation study of the deep learning-based early warning score for predicting in-hospital cardiac arrest in patients admitted to general wards.一项基于深度学习的早期预警评分对普通病房入院患者院内心脏骤停预测的多中心验证研究。
Resuscitation. 2021 Apr 22;163:78-85. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.04.013.
8
Dynamic and explainable machine learning prediction of mortality in patients in the intensive care unit: a retrospective study of high-frequency data in electronic patient records.动态可解释机器学习预测 ICU 患者死亡率:电子患者记录中高频数据的回顾性研究。
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Apr;2(4):e179-e191. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30018-2. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
9
Continuous and automatic mortality risk prediction using vital signs in the intensive care unit: a hybrid neural network approach.使用生命体征在重症监护病房进行连续和自动的死亡率风险预测:一种混合神经网络方法。
Sci Rep. 2020 Dec 4;10(1):21282. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-78184-7.
10
Early mortality in critical illness - A descriptive analysis of patients who died within 24 hours of ICU admission.危重病患者的早期死亡率——对 ICU 入院 24 小时内死亡患者的描述性分析。
J Crit Care. 2020 Dec;60:279-284. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.08.024. Epub 2020 Sep 3.