Buzatu Berivan Laura Rebeca, Luca Magda Mihaela, Galuscan Atena, Vaduva Adrian Ovidiu, Fratila Aurora Doris, Dumitrescu Ramona, Sava-Rosianu Ruxandra, Balean Octavia, Buzatu Roxana, Jumanca Daniela
Translational and Experimental Clinical Research Centre in Oral Health, Department of Preventive, Community Dentistry and Oral Health, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Victor Babes", 300040 Timisoara, Romania.
Clinic of Preventive, Community Dentistry and Oral Health, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Eftimie Murgu Sq. no 2, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 1;14(13):4642. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134642.
: Tooth bleaching is a widely requested aesthetic procedure in modern dentistry. However, the structural effects of high-concentration peroxide-based bleaching agents on enamel remain insufficiently understood. This study aims to evaluate and compare the effects of three in-office bleaching agents-Opalescence Boost (40% hydrogen peroxide [HP]), Opalescence Quick (45% carbamide peroxide [CP]), and BlancOne Ultra + (35% hydrogen peroxide [HP])-on enamel surface characteristics and color change using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) and spectrophotometric analysis. : Forty-two extracted human teeth were sectioned and divided into experimental and control halves. Each experimental specimen underwent bleaching according to the manufacturer's protocol. Color measurements were conducted at baseline, immediately post-treatment, at 3 days, 7 days, and 6 months following treatment using the Vita Easyshade spectrophotometer. Color differences were calculated using the CIEDE2000 (ΔE) formula. Enamel surface morphology was assessed by CLSM. Data were analyzed using Wilcoxon and Kruskal-Wallis tests ( < 0.05), performed with SPSS v23. : All bleaching agents produced clinically perceptible color changes (ΔE > 3.3). Opalescence Boost achieved the highest and most consistent whitening effect (mean ΔE > 11), while Opalescence Quick showed moderate efficacy (ΔE ~6-8), and BlancOne Ultra+ induced milder changes (ΔE ~4-5). CLSM imaging revealed surface alterations in all bleached samples, with more pronounced changes observed in specimens treated with higher peroxide concentrations. : All three bleaching systems were effective in improving enamel color, with Opalescence Boost delivering the most substantial and durable effect. CLSM analysis confirmed morphological changes in enamel without evidence of severe damage. These results underscore the importance of selecting bleaching protocols that balance efficacy with enamel safety. Further in vivo studies are recommended to validate long-term structural effects and support clinical decision-making.
牙齿美白是现代牙科中一项被广泛需求的美容程序。然而,高浓度过氧化物基漂白剂对牙釉质的结构影响仍未得到充分了解。本研究旨在使用共聚焦激光扫描显微镜(CLSM)和分光光度分析评估并比较三种诊室漂白剂——皓齿美白加速版(40%过氧化氢[HP])、皓齿美白快速版(45%过氧化脲[CP])和博恩美白超强版(35%过氧化氢[HP])——对牙釉质表面特征和颜色变化的影响。42颗拔除的人牙被切片并分为实验半片和对照半片。每个实验样本按照制造商的方案进行漂白。使用Vita Easyshade分光光度计在基线、治疗后即刻、治疗后3天、7天和6个月进行颜色测量。使用CIEDE2000(ΔE)公式计算颜色差异。通过CLSM评估牙釉质表面形态。使用SPSS v23进行Wilcoxon和Kruskal - Wallis检验(<0.05)分析数据。所有漂白剂均产生了临床上可察觉的颜色变化(ΔE>3.3)。皓齿美白加速版实现了最高且最一致的美白效果(平均ΔE>11),而皓齿美白快速版显示出中等疗效(ΔE约为6 - 8),博恩美白超强版引起的变化较轻微(ΔE约为4 - 5)。CLSM成像显示所有漂白样本的表面均有改变,在使用较高过氧化物浓度处理的样本中观察到更明显的变化。所有三种漂白系统在改善牙釉质颜色方面均有效,其中皓齿美白加速版产生的效果最显著且持久。CLSM分析证实牙釉质存在形态变化,但无严重损伤的证据。这些结果强调了选择在疗效与牙釉质安全性之间取得平衡的漂白方案的重要性。建议进一步进行体内研究以验证长期结构影响并支持临床决策。