Naef Lukas, Vasella Mauro, Watson Jennifer, Reid Gregory, Breckwoldt Tabea, Waldner Matthias, Hofmann Luzie, Pais Michael-Alexander, Buehler Philipp, Plock Jan Alexander, Kim Bong-Sung
Department of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
Department of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, Cantonal Hospital of Frauenfeld, 8501 Frauenfeld, Switzerland.
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 3;14(13):4710. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134710.
: The traditional management of acute burn wounds using eschar debridement followed by split-thickness skin grafting has notable drawbacks. Stromal vascular fraction (SVF), derived from autologous adipose tissue, promotes epithelialization and angiogenesis, while platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), obtained via centrifugation of patient blood, enhances wound healing. This study retrospectively analyzes the outcomes of patients with thermal injuries treated with a combination of topical SVF and PRF at the University Hospital Zurich Burn Center. : From 2018 to 2020, 13 patients with deep partial-thickness burns (DPTBs) or mixed-pattern burns (MPBs) received combined topical SVF and PRF treatment. Eschar removal was performed enzymatically or surgically following hydrotherapy. SVF was collected via liposuction, and PRF from centrifuged blood. Healing progress, additional surgeries, and scar outcomes (assessed by the Manchester Scar Scale, MSS) were evaluated retrospectively. : The mean total body surface area burned was 29.6%, with 6.3% treated using SVF and PRF. Five patients required further surgical intervention for residual defects. Complete healing occurred within 20 days in patients without residual defects and within 51 days in those with defects. Higher MSS scores were observed in patients requiring additional surgery. No adverse effects were noted. : Topical SVF and PRF offer a potentially less-invasive treatment for MPB and DPTB. However, due to frequent residual defects and regulatory concerns around SVF use, this approach cannot yet be considered a standard treatment.
传统的急性烧伤创面处理方法是先进行焦痂清创,然后进行中厚皮片移植,这种方法有明显的缺点。源自自体脂肪组织的基质血管成分(SVF)可促进上皮形成和血管生成,而通过患者血液离心获得的富血小板纤维蛋白(PRF)可促进伤口愈合。本研究回顾性分析了苏黎世大学医院烧伤中心采用局部应用SVF和PRF联合治疗热损伤患者的疗效。2018年至2020年,13例深Ⅱ度烧伤(DPTB)或混合型烧伤(MPB)患者接受了局部应用SVF和PRF联合治疗。在水疗后通过酶法或手术方法去除焦痂。通过抽脂收集SVF,通过血液离心收集PRF。回顾性评估愈合进程、额外手术情况以及瘢痕结局(采用曼彻斯特瘢痕量表,MSS进行评估)。平均烧伤总面积为29.6%,其中6.3%的面积采用SVF和PRF治疗。5例患者因残留缺损需要进一步手术干预。无残留缺损的患者在20天内实现完全愈合,有缺损的患者在51天内实现完全愈合。需要额外手术的患者MSS评分更高。未观察到不良反应。局部应用SVF和PRF为MPB和DPTB提供了一种潜在的侵入性较小的治疗方法。然而,由于频繁出现残留缺损以及围绕SVF使用的监管问题,这种方法目前还不能被视为标准治疗方法。