Adames Saltenat Moghaddam, Naz Sidra, Dai Jianliang, Wang Yinghong, Shirwaikar Thomas Anusha
Department of Internal Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 3;14(13):4711. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134711.
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are highly effective cancer therapies used across a broad spectrum of malignancies. They function by disrupting immune inhibitory pathways, resulting in an amplified immune response against tumors. However, this heightened immune activity can predispose patients to immune-mediated colitis (IMC), which is graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) and can range from mild diarrhea to severe colitis. Prior studies have shown that fecal stream diversion can modify the gut microbiome and influence the severity of intestinal inflammation. This study investigates the impact of fecal stream diversion on IMC outcomes in cancer patients receiving ICIs. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients treated with ICIs from 2016 to 2023 who had a history of fecal stream diversion. Demographic, oncologic, and toxicity-related data were collected. Patients with active gastrointestinal infections, autoimmune GI diseases, or graft-versus-host disease were excluded. Descriptive statistics and univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed using SAS version 9.4. A total of 44 patients were included and categorized into two groups based on the timing of bowel stoma creation relative to the IMC event. CTCAE grade for diarrhea was used to assess GI toxicity. While overall CTCAE grade distribution for diarrhea did not differ significantly between groups ( = 0.22), Hispanic ethnicity was significantly associated with a lower CTCAE grade compared to non-Hispanic or Latino individuals (OR [95% CI] = 0.12 [0.02, 0.62], = 0.011). In contrast, higher CTCAE grades were significantly associated with ileostomy versus colostomy (OR [95% CI] = 3.21 [1.01, 10.18], = 0.048) and in patients without an ostomy at the time of diarrhea onset compared to those with an ostomy (OR [95% CI] = 8.87 [2.51, 31.31], = 0.0007). Our findings suggest that the CTCAE diarrhea grade is significantly associated with ethnicity, type of stoma, and presence of ostomy at the time of diarrhea. Limitations include the retrospective study design and small sample size. These results contribute to understanding potential strategies for mitigating the serious gastrointestinal toxicities of ICIs.
免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)是用于多种恶性肿瘤的高效癌症治疗药物。它们通过破坏免疫抑制途径发挥作用,从而增强针对肿瘤的免疫反应。然而,这种增强的免疫活性会使患者易患免疫介导性结肠炎(IMC),IMC使用不良事件通用术语标准(CTCAE)进行分级,范围从轻度腹泻到严重结肠炎。先前的研究表明,粪便转流可改变肠道微生物群并影响肠道炎症的严重程度。本研究调查了粪便转流对接受ICIs治疗的癌症患者IMC结局的影响。我们对2016年至2023年接受ICIs治疗且有粪便转流病史的患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。收集了人口统计学、肿瘤学和毒性相关数据。排除有活动性胃肠道感染、自身免疫性胃肠道疾病或移植物抗宿主病的患者。使用SAS 9.4版进行描述性统计以及单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析。总共纳入了44例患者,并根据造口形成时间与IMC事件的关系分为两组。使用腹泻的CTCAE分级来评估胃肠道毒性。虽然两组之间腹泻的总体CTCAE分级分布没有显著差异(P = 0.22),但与非西班牙裔或拉丁裔个体相比,西班牙裔种族与较低的CTCAE分级显著相关(比值比[95%置信区间]= 0.12 [0.02, 0.62],P = 0.011)。相比之下,与结肠造口相比,回肠造口与较高的CTCAE分级显著相关(比值比[95%置信区间]= 3.21 [1.01, 10.18],P = 0.048),并且腹泻发作时无造口的患者与有造口的患者相比,CTCAE分级更高(比值比[95%置信区间]= 8.87 [2.51, 31.31],P = 0.0007)。我们的研究结果表明,CTCAE腹泻分级与种族、造口类型以及腹泻时造口的存在显著相关。局限性包括回顾性研究设计和样本量小。这些结果有助于理解减轻ICIs严重胃肠道毒性的潜在策略。