Urîtu Andrei, Buciu Victor Bogdan, Roi Ciprian, Chioran Doina, Serban Denis Mihai, Nicoleta Nicolae, Rusu Elena Lavinia, Ionac Mihai, Riviș Mircea, Ciurescu Sebastian
Doctoral School, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, E. Murgu Square, No. 2, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.
Department of Anesthesiology and Oral Surgery, Research Center of Dento-Alveolar Surgery, Anesthesia and Sedation in Dental Medicine, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Eftimie Murgu Sq. No. 2, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 6;14(13):4773. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134773.
: The use of vasoconstrictors in dental anesthesia during pregnancy raises clinical concerns due to their potential effects on uteroplacental blood flow and fetal well-being. Despite widespread use, the safety profiles of agents such as epinephrine, levonordefrin, and felypressin remain insufficiently reviewed, particularly in isolation from local anesthetics. : A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed (MEDLINE) for studies published between January 2000 and May 2025, following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Included studies assessed the use, pharmacokinetics, or outcomes of vasoconstrictor agents used in dental procedures during pregnancy. Articles were selected based on predefined inclusion criteria and synthesized narratively. : Out of 95 screened records, only six narrative reviews and three clinical guidelines met eligibility criteria. Epinephrine was the most frequently described agent, generally regarded as safe at low dental doses (1:100,000-1:200,000) when properly administered. Levonordefrin showed insufficient safety data and was associated with potential uterine vasoconstriction. Felypressin was contraindicated due to its oxytocic properties and high risk of inducing uterine contractions. : Among vasoconstrictors, epinephrine remains the only agent with an acceptable safety profile in pregnancy when used correctly. Levonordefrin lacks adequate evidence, and felypressin poses clear risks. Until further clinical trials are available, individualized risk assessment and adherence to obstetric and dental guidelines are critical for ensuring maternal and fetal safety.
孕期牙科麻醉中使用血管收缩剂引发了临床关注,因为它们可能会对子宫胎盘血流和胎儿健康产生影响。尽管广泛使用,但诸如肾上腺素、左旋去甲肾上腺素和非加压素等药物的安全性仍未得到充分审查,尤其是在与局部麻醉剂分开使用的情况下。
按照PRISMA 2020指南,使用PubMed(MEDLINE)对2000年1月至2025年5月发表的研究进行了系统的文献检索。纳入的研究评估了孕期牙科手术中使用的血管收缩剂的使用情况、药代动力学或结果。根据预先确定的纳入标准选择文章并进行叙述性综合分析。
在95篇筛选记录中,只有6篇叙述性综述和3篇临床指南符合入选标准。肾上腺素是描述最频繁的药物,在正确给药时,低牙科剂量(1:100,000 - 1:200,000)下通常被认为是安全的。左旋去甲肾上腺素的安全性数据不足,且与潜在的子宫血管收缩有关。非加压素因其催产特性和诱发子宫收缩的高风险而被禁用。
在血管收缩剂中,肾上腺素在孕期正确使用时仍然是唯一具有可接受安全性的药物。左旋去甲肾上腺素缺乏充分证据,而非加压素存在明显风险。在有进一步的临床试验之前进行个体化风险评估并遵循产科和牙科指南对于确保母婴安全至关重要。