Wassom J S
Environ Health Perspect. 1985 Sep;61:287-94. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8561287.
This paper addresses the subject of the use of selected toxicology information resources in assessing relationships between chemical structure and specific biological end points. To assist the researcher in how to access the primary literature of genetic toxicology, teratogenesis, and carcinogenesis, three specific specialized information centers are discussed--Environmental Mutagen Information Center, Environmental Teratology Information Center, and Environmental Carcinogenesis Information Center. Also included are descriptions of information resources that contain evaluated (peer-reviewed) biological research results. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Genetic Toxicology Program, the International Agency for Research on Cancer Monographs, and the Toxicology Data Bank are the best sources currently available to obtain peer-reviewed results for compounds tested for genotoxicity, carcinogenicity, and other toxicological end points. The value of published information lies in its use. It has become evident that most information cannot be accepted at face value for interpretation and analysis when subjected to stringent quality evaluation criteria. This deficit can be corrected by rigid editorship and the cognizance of authors. Increased interest in alternative methods to in vivo animal testing will be exemplified by use of short-term bioassays and in structure-activity relationship studies. With respect to this latter area, it must be remembered that mechanically (computer generated) derived data cannot substitute, at least at this stage, for data obtained from actual animal testing. The future of structure-activity relationship studies will rest only in their use as a predictive tool.
本文探讨了在评估化学结构与特定生物学终点之间的关系时使用选定毒理学信息资源的主题。为了帮助研究人员了解如何获取遗传毒理学、致畸学和致癌学的原始文献,本文讨论了三个特定的专业信息中心——环境诱变信息中心、环境致畸学信息中心和环境致癌学信息中心。本文还介绍了包含经过评估(同行评审)的生物学研究结果的信息资源。美国环境保护局遗传毒理学计划、国际癌症研究机构专论以及毒理学数据库是目前获取经同行评审的化合物遗传毒性、致癌性和其他毒理学终点测试结果的最佳来源。已发表信息的价值在于其用途。很明显,当受到严格的质量评估标准时,大多数信息不能照单全收用于解释和分析。这种不足可以通过严格的编辑和作者的认知来纠正。对替代体内动物试验方法的兴趣增加将通过短期生物测定和构效关系研究的使用来体现。关于后一个领域,必须记住,机械(计算机生成)得出的数据至少在现阶段不能替代从实际动物试验中获得的数据。构效关系研究的未来仅取决于它们作为预测工具的用途。