Ansari Daniel, Rystedt Jenny, Søreide Kjetil, Lindberg Maria, Andersson Roland
Department of Surgery, Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Clin Exp Metastasis. 2025 Jul 12;42(4):39. doi: 10.1007/s10585-025-10357-y.
The modern use of neoadjuvant and conversion systemic therapy in patients with colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM) has improved resection rates and changed the borders between "resectable" and "unresectable" disease. Also, the use of preoperative systemic therapy has resulted in an increased frequency of disappearing liver metastasis (DLM). The optimal management of DLM is still controversial. In this review, we explore the current literature and highlight key findings relating to the tumor biology, diagnosis and treatment options of DLM. The definition of DLM should be based on hepatobiliary contrast MRI, which is the most sensitive preoperative imaging method. Patients with DLM are younger and more often have normalized their CEA-levels, and they have a better survival than those without DLM, likely reflecting favorable tumor biology and effective treatment response. Recent data indicate that molecular profiling (e.g. APC mutations) may predict CRLM at highest risk for vanishing after chemotherapy. However, just because the lesion has disappeared on imaging does not mean that there is a complete histopathological response. However a "watch and wait" strategy for patients with DLM is not associated with a reduced survival compared to resected DLM, but may be associated with a higher rate of recurrence often available for "rescue therapy", i.e. ablation or resection at the time when DLM recur and become visible. Furthermore, very few of "blind resections" of DLM contain viable tumor cells. International surveys among practicing hepatobiliary surgeons have revealed a widespread variation in the clinical management of DLM. In the future, biopsy and sequencing of metastases may be considered for therapeutic decision making in patients with CRLM considering the intricate tumor heterogeneity and clonal evolution of the disease.
在结直肠癌肝转移(CRLM)患者中,新辅助和转化性全身治疗的现代应用提高了切除率,并改变了“可切除”和“不可切除”疾病之间的界限。此外,术前全身治疗的使用导致肝转移消失(DLM)的频率增加。DLM的最佳管理仍存在争议。在本综述中,我们探讨了当前的文献,并强调了与DLM的肿瘤生物学、诊断和治疗选择相关的关键发现。DLM的定义应基于肝胆对比磁共振成像(MRI),这是最敏感的术前成像方法。DLM患者更年轻,癌胚抗原(CEA)水平更常恢复正常,并且他们的生存率高于无DLM的患者,这可能反映了良好的肿瘤生物学特性和有效的治疗反应。最近的数据表明,分子谱分析(例如APC突变)可能预测化疗后消失风险最高的CRLM。然而,仅仅因为病变在影像学上消失并不意味着有完全的组织病理学反应。然而,与切除的DLM相比,对DLM患者采取“观察等待”策略与生存率降低无关,但可能与更高的复发率相关,DLM复发并变得可见时通常可进行“挽救性治疗”,即消融或切除。此外,DLM的“盲目切除”中很少含有存活的肿瘤细胞。对执业肝胆外科医生的国际调查显示,DLM的临床管理存在广泛差异。考虑到该疾病复杂的肿瘤异质性和克隆进化,未来对于CRLM患者,在治疗决策时可考虑对转移灶进行活检和测序。