Suppr超能文献

固定前倾或后倾、或可倾斜座椅的办公椅比较。

Comparison of office chairs with fixed forwards or backwards inclining, or tiltable seats.

作者信息

Bendix T, Winkel J, Jessen F

出版信息

Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1985;54(4):378-85. doi: 10.1007/BF02337181.

Abstract

Three adjustments of an office chair seat: one inclining +10 degrees (forwards), one inclining -5 degrees (backwards), and one being freely tiltable from -8 degrees to +19.5 degrees were investigated using two groups of healthy female workers in a field (n = 12), and a laboratory study (n = 10), respectively. The seat adjustments were examined with regard to effects on foot swelling, lumbar muscular load, backrest pressure and subjective acceptability. Desk-work and typing were compared according to lumbar muscular activity, seat movements (tiltable seat), and backrest pressure. Foot swelling tended to increase with increasing seat height but was not influenced by the ability to tilt the seat or not. With the different seat adjustments lumbar muscular activity did not change systematically in spite of greater backrest pressure when the seat inclined backwards. The tiltable seat was preferred to the others. Typing was associated with a more constrained and tens posture than desk work, because movements, transferred to the tiltable seat, decreased and the muscular load increased. Backrest pressure was highest during typing. A tendency towards gradually increasing restlessness (i.e. seat movements) and increasing forward inclination of the tiltable seat with time was observed.

摘要

使用两组健康女性工人,分别在现场研究(n = 12)和实验室研究(n = 10)中,对办公椅座椅的三种调节方式进行了调查:一种向前倾斜10度,一种向后倾斜5度,一种可在-8度至+19.5度之间自由倾斜。对座椅调节在足部肿胀、腰部肌肉负荷、靠背压力和主观可接受性方面的影响进行了检查。根据腰部肌肉活动、座椅运动(可倾斜座椅)和靠背压力,对伏案工作和打字进行了比较。足部肿胀倾向于随着座椅高度的增加而增加,但不受座椅是否可倾斜的影响。尽管座椅向后倾斜时靠背压力更大,但随着座椅调节方式的不同,腰部肌肉活动并没有系统性变化。可倾斜座椅比其他座椅更受青睐。与伏案工作相比,打字时的姿势更受限且更紧张,因为转移到可倾斜座椅上的动作减少,肌肉负荷增加。打字时靠背压力最高。观察到随着时间推移,不安感(即座椅运动)逐渐增加,可倾斜座椅向前倾斜的趋势也增加。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验