Monteiro Renata Vasconcelos, Amarante Jose Eduardo Vasconcellos, Bona Vitor Schweigert, Lins Rodrigo Barros Esteves, Lopes Guilherme Carpena, Blackburn Megan, Swanson Christine, Latorre Javiera A, De Souza Grace M
School of Dental Medicine, Pacific Northwest University of Health Sciences, 111 University Parkway, Yakima, WA, 98901, USA.
Department of Specific Training, School of Dentistry, Federal Fluminense University, 22 Dr. Silvio Henrique Braune, Rio de Janeiro, Nova Friburgo, 24020-140, Brazil.
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Jul 14;33(8):688. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09755-5.
To evaluate the effect of conventional and bioactive restorative materials on bond strength to control (non-irradiated) and irradiated dentin.
Human dentin fragments (240) were polished and divided into non-irradiated dentin (NI; n = 120) and irradiated dentin (ID; n = 120). ID specimens received 70 Gy irradiation (2 Gy/fraction, 5 days/week for 7 weeks). All dentin surfaces were bonded to restorative materials with Scotchbond universal adhesive in self-etching mode. Microshear bond strength cylinders were built on the bonded surface according to the restorative material (4 subgroups, n = 30): conventional resin composite (CC-Filtek Z250) and three bioactive restorative composites (BCI-Activa BioActive-Restorative; BCII-Beautiful II; BCIII-Predicta Bulk). Specimens were stored in water at 37 °C for 24 h or 30 days and subjected to microshear bond strength test. The data was analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc test (⍺ < 0.05). The morphological surface of both NI and ID dentin (n = 3) was analyzed using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM).
Two-way ANOVA revealed a significant effect of the Time/Radiation (p < 0.001). Restorative material (p = 0.191) and the interaction Time/Radiation*Restorative material (p = 0.169) were not significant. Irradiation decreased the bond strength of CC specimens at both 24 h (p < 0.001) and 30 days (p < 0.001). None of the bioactive materials were significantly affected by irradiation and storage time. The SEM analysis revealed morphological changes in the ID specimens.
Ionizing radiation-induced morphological changes in the dentin surface. These changes negatively affected the conventional resin composite bond strengths to dentin. However, these morphological alterations did not affect the bond strength of the bioactive restorative materials.
评估传统修复材料和生物活性修复材料对未照射和照射后牙本质粘结强度的影响。
将240个人类牙本质碎片进行抛光,分为未照射牙本质(NI;n = 120)和照射牙本质(ID;n = 120)。ID标本接受70 Gy照射(2 Gy/分次,每周5天,共7周)。所有牙本质表面均采用Scotchbond通用粘结剂在自酸蚀模式下与修复材料粘结。根据修复材料在粘结表面制作微剪切粘结强度圆柱体(4个亚组,n = 30):传统树脂复合材料(CC - Filtek Z250)和三种生物活性修复复合材料(BCI - Activa BioActive - Restorative;BCII - Beautiful II;BCIII - Predicta Bulk)。标本在37℃水中储存24小时或30天,然后进行微剪切粘结强度测试。数据采用双向方差分析和Tukey事后检验(α < 0.05)进行分析。使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)分析NI和ID牙本质(n = 3)的形态表面。
双向方差分析显示时间/辐射有显著影响(p < 0.001)。修复材料(p = 0.191)以及时间/辐射*修复材料的交互作用(p = 0.169)不显著。照射降低了CC标本在24小时(p < 0.001)和30天(p < 0.001)时的粘结强度。没有一种生物活性材料受到照射和储存时间的显著影响。SEM分析显示ID标本有形态变化。
电离辐射导致牙本质表面形态变化。这些变化对传统树脂复合材料与牙本质的粘结强度有负面影响。然而,这些形态改变并未影响生物活性修复材料的粘结强度。