• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

德国的疫苗接种意愿与政党偏好:信任、集体责任与民粹主义极右翼势力

Vaccination readiness and political party preference in Germany: Trust, collective responsibility, and the populist radical right.

作者信息

Magnus Kathleen D, Dammann Niklas, Lüdecke Daniel

机构信息

Institute of Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Jul 14;20(7):e0328045. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328045. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0328045
PMID:40658676
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12258577/
Abstract

Numerous studies in Western countries have linked vaccine hesitancy to populist political leanings. This study focused on Germany, where there has been considerable debate as to whether this hesitancy is common across the political spectrum, fueled equally by right and left populist extremes, or driven primarily by the populist radical right. The aim of this study was to determine whether and to what extent two specific aspects of vaccine readiness -- trust and collective responsibility -- correlate with political party preferences in Germany. Evidence from a large-scale survey of German citizens (n = 2,191) showed that even after adjusting for gender, age, and education level, several indicators of vaccine hesitancy were most pronounced among supporters of Germany's far-right populist party, the Alternative for Germany. Though these voters expressed a degree of vaccine readiness on some of the measures, they deviated significantly from all other voting groups in the direction of vaccine hesitancy on every measure. Green party voters expressed the strongest vaccine readiness, with the other major parties following close behind. The belief that the medical establishment profited excessively during the pandemic was prevalent across all parties. Taken together, these results suggest that political affiliations may play a sizeable role in views about vaccines. Results also affirm the importance that public trust and collective responsibility have for the realization of public health goals.

摘要

西方国家的众多研究已将疫苗犹豫与民粹主义政治倾向联系起来。本研究聚焦于德国,关于这种犹豫在整个政治谱系中是否普遍存在,是由左右翼民粹主义极端势力同等推动,还是主要由极右翼民粹主义驱动,一直存在相当多的争论。本研究的目的是确定疫苗准备程度的两个具体方面——信任和集体责任——在德国是否以及在多大程度上与政党偏好相关。来自对德国公民的大规模调查(n = 2191)的证据表明,即使在对性别、年龄和教育水平进行调整之后,疫苗犹豫的几个指标在德国极右翼民粹主义政党德国选择党的支持者中最为明显。尽管这些选民在某些指标上表现出一定程度的疫苗准备程度,但在每项指标上,他们在疫苗犹豫的方向上与所有其他投票群体都有显著差异。绿党选民表现出最强的疫苗准备程度,其他主要政党紧随其后。认为医疗机构在疫情期间获利过多的看法在所有政党中都很普遍。综合来看,这些结果表明政治派别可能在对疫苗的看法中发挥相当大的作用。结果还证实了公众信任和集体责任对实现公共卫生目标的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9ec/12258577/bc488d21f5c6/pone.0328045.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9ec/12258577/bc488d21f5c6/pone.0328045.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9ec/12258577/bc488d21f5c6/pone.0328045.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Vaccination readiness and political party preference in Germany: Trust, collective responsibility, and the populist radical right.德国的疫苗接种意愿与政党偏好:信任、集体责任与民粹主义极右翼势力
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 14;20(7):e0328045. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328045. eCollection 2025.
2
From institutional trust to digital literacy: Socioeconomic and political determinants of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among Czech adults based on a national panel survey.从机构信任到数字素养:基于全国性面板调查的捷克成年人对新冠疫苗犹豫态度的社会经济和政治决定因素
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2025 Dec;21(1):2533639. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2025.2533639. Epub 2025 Jul 15.
3
A Pilot Study of Political Experiences and Barriers to Voting Among Autistic Adults Participating in Online Survey Research in the United States.一项针对参与美国在线调查研究的成年自闭症患者的政治经历和投票障碍的试点研究。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):261-272. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0119. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
5
Factors that influence parents' and informal caregivers' views and practices regarding routine childhood vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响父母和非正式照顾者对常规儿童疫苗接种看法和做法的因素:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 27;10(10):CD013265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013265.pub2.
6
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
7
Acceptance-Hesitancy of COVID-19 Vaccination and Factors Affecting It in Adults: Systematic Review Study.成人对 COVID-19 疫苗接种的接受犹豫及其影响因素的系统评价研究。
Immun Inflamm Dis. 2024 Nov;12(11):e70076. doi: 10.1002/iid3.70076.
8
The complex landscape of vaccine hesitancy and hesitant adopters: Quantitative predictors and thematic insights into COVID-19 vaccine attitudes.疫苗犹豫及犹豫接种者的复杂情况:新冠疫苗态度的定量预测因素及主题洞察
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2025 Dec;21(1):2511350. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2025.2511350. Epub 2025 Jun 20.
9
Parents' and informal caregivers' views and experiences of communication about routine childhood vaccination: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.父母及非正式照料者关于儿童常规疫苗接种沟通的观点与经历:定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 7;2(2):CD011787. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011787.pub2.
10
Parental hesitancy on COVID-19 vaccination of children under the age of 16: A cross-sectional mixed-methods study among factory workers.16岁以下儿童新冠疫苗接种的家长犹豫情况:一项针对工厂工人的横断面混合方法研究
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 26;20(6):e0327056. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327056. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Covid and the common good: In-group out-group dynamics and Covid-19 vaccination in Wales and the United States.新冠疫情与共同利益:威尔士和美国的群体内群体外动态与新冠疫苗接种
Soc Sci Med. 2024 Jul;352:117022. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117022. Epub 2024 May 31.
2
Regional variations in vaccination against COVID-19 in Germany.德国 COVID-19 疫苗接种的地区差异。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 18;19(4):e0296976. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296976. eCollection 2024.
3
Infodemic in Germany and Brazil: How the AfD and Jair Bolsonaro are Sowing Distrust During the Corona Pandemic.
德国和巴西的信息疫情:德国选择党和雅伊尔·博索纳罗如何在新冠疫情期间播撒不信任。
Z Literaturwissenschaft Linguist. 2021;51(3):477-503. doi: 10.1007/s41244-021-00210-6. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
4
Far-right political ideology and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: Multilevel analysis of 21 European countries.极右翼政治意识形态与新冠疫苗犹豫态度:对21个欧洲国家的多层次分析
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Oct;335:116227. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116227. Epub 2023 Sep 9.
5
Political orientation predicts the use of conventional and complementary/alternative medicine: A survey study of 19 European countries.政治倾向预测常规和补充/替代医学的使用:对 19 个欧洲国家的调查研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Aug;331:116089. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116089. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
6
COVID-19 vaccination status in Germany: Factors and reasons for not being vaccinated (yet).德国的 COVID-19 疫苗接种状况:未接种(或尚未完成接种)疫苗的因素和原因。
Front Public Health. 2023 Feb 13;11:1070272. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1070272. eCollection 2023.
7
The COVID-19 curtain: Can past communist regimes explain the vaccination divide in Europe?新冠大流行的“隔离幕”:共产主义政权能否解释欧洲的疫苗接种鸿沟?
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Mar;321:115759. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115759. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
8
Deliberation, context, emotion and trust - understanding the dynamics of adults' COVID-19 vaccination decisions in Germany.深思熟虑、背景、情感和信任——理解德国成年人 COVID-19 疫苗接种决策的动态。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jan 19;23(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14587-7.
9
Left-Right-Position, party affiliation and regional differences explain low COVID-19 vaccination rates in Germany.左右翼立场、党派归属和地区差异解释了德国 COVID-19 疫苗接种率低的原因。
Microb Biotechnol. 2023 Mar;16(3):662-677. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.14210. Epub 2023 Jan 9.
10
Why some people do not get vaccinated against COVID-19: Social-cognitive determinants of vaccination behavior.为什么有些人不接种 COVID-19 疫苗:接种行为的社会认知决定因素。
Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2023 Aug;15(3):825-845. doi: 10.1111/aphw.12411. Epub 2022 Nov 8.