Walter Elias, Brock Tobias, Lahoud Pierre, Werner Nils, Czaja Felix, Tichy Antonin, Bumm Caspar, Bender Andreas, Castro Ana, Teughels Wim, Schwendicke Falk, Folwaczny Matthias
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, GoethestraSSe 70, Munich, Bavaria, Germany.
Department of Statistics, LMU Munich, Munich, Bavaria, Germany.
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Jul 15;8(1):445. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01828-3.
Steps I and II periodontal therapy is the first-line treatment for periodontal disease, but has varying success. This study aimed to develop machine learning models to predict changes in periodontal probing depth (PPD) after step II therapy using patient-, tooth-, and site-specific clinical covariates. Models accurately predicted that healthy sites stay healthy, but performed suboptimally for diseased sites. Tuning improved performance, with PPD, tooth-site, and tooth-type identified as key predictors. Pocket closure was predicted with fair accuracy, with baseline PPD as the most relevant covariate. Models predicted improving pockets well but underperformed for non-responding sites, with antibiotic treatment and tooth type being the most influential features. While predictive performance for step II periodontal therapy based on routine clinical data remains limited, models can stratify periodontal sites into meaningful categories and estimate the probability of pocket improvement. They provide a foundation for site-specific outcome prediction and may support patient communication and expectations.
第一步和第二步牙周治疗是牙周疾病的一线治疗方法,但成功率各不相同。本研究旨在开发机器学习模型,使用患者、牙齿和部位特异性临床协变量来预测第二步治疗后牙周探诊深度(PPD)的变化。模型准确预测了健康部位会保持健康,但对患病部位的预测效果欠佳。调整参数提高了性能,PPD、牙齿部位和牙齿类型被确定为关键预测因素。袋闭合的预测准确性尚可,基线PPD是最相关的协变量。模型对改善袋情况预测良好,但对无反应部位表现不佳,抗生素治疗和牙齿类型是最具影响力的特征。虽然基于常规临床数据对第二步牙周治疗的预测性能仍然有限,但模型可以将牙周部位分层为有意义的类别,并估计袋改善的概率。它们为部位特异性结果预测提供了基础,并可能支持医患沟通和患者期望。