• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用质量改进提升英国国民医疗服务体系(NHS)中严重事件报告的质量

Using Quality Improvement to improve serious incident reporting in the English NHS.

作者信息

Santos Carlos, Ajayi-Obe Abiola, Aurelio Marco

机构信息

Quality Improvement Department, East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

Governance and Risk Team, East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open Qual. 2025 Jul 16;14(3):e003234. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003234.

DOI:10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003234
PMID:40669930
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12273103/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Timely completion of serious incident reports is crucial for patient safety and regulatory compliance. Delays hinder organisational learning and compromise patient outcomes. Between May 2021 and April 2022, East London NHS Foundation Trust (ELFT), a provider of mental health, community health and primary care services to approximately 1.8 million people across London and Bedfordshire, faced a significant backlog of serious incident reports. Completion times averaged 208 days-well beyond the 60-day target set by NHS England at the time.

METHODS

A quality improvement (QI) initiative employing structured methodologies, including the ELFT Sequence of Improvement, statistical process control, Ishikawa analysis, a driver diagram and plan-do-study-act cycles to diagnose and address process inefficiencies.

INTERVENTIONS

Three main change ideas were tested and implemented: concise reporting templates to streamline documentation, a caseload tracker for real-time monitoring and team escalation meetings to improve communication and accountability.

RESULTS

These interventions led to a 65% reduction in average completion time, decreasing from 208 days to 74 days. Additionally, staff collaboration and workflow efficiency improved, fostering a culture of continuous improvement, continuous learning and accountability.

CONCLUSIONS

This project demonstrates the effectiveness of structured QI methodologies in improving serious incident reporting. The implemented changes are sustainable and provide a scalable model for other healthcare organisations aiming to enhance patient safety and compliance. Future work will focus on embedding these improvements into routine practice and exploring their impact on broader organisational learning.

摘要

背景

及时完成严重事件报告对于患者安全和法规合规至关重要。延迟会阻碍组织学习并危及患者治疗结果。在2021年5月至2022年4月期间,东伦敦国民保健服务基金会信托基金(ELFT),一家为伦敦和贝德福德郡约180万人提供心理健康、社区健康和初级保健服务的机构,面临着严重事件报告的大量积压。完成时间平均为208天,远远超过了当时英国国民保健服务体系设定的60天目标。

方法

一项采用结构化方法的质量改进(QI)计划,包括ELFT改进序列、统计过程控制、石川分析、驱动图和计划-执行-研究-行动循环,以诊断和解决流程效率低下问题。

干预措施

测试并实施了三个主要的变革理念:简化文档的简洁报告模板、用于实时监控的工作量跟踪器以及改善沟通和问责制的团队升级会议。

结果

这些干预措施使平均完成时间减少了65%,从208天降至74天。此外,员工协作和工作流程效率得到提高,营造了持续改进、持续学习和问责的文化。

结论

该项目证明了结构化QI方法在改善严重事件报告方面的有效性。实施的变革具有可持续性,并为其他旨在提高患者安全和合规性的医疗组织提供了可扩展的模型。未来的工作将集中于将这些改进融入日常实践,并探索它们对更广泛的组织学习的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7dfc/12273103/a12a85e563ce/bmjoq-14-3-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7dfc/12273103/a4146bc9f387/bmjoq-14-3-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7dfc/12273103/fb5d4c8b3e10/bmjoq-14-3-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7dfc/12273103/a12a85e563ce/bmjoq-14-3-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7dfc/12273103/a4146bc9f387/bmjoq-14-3-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7dfc/12273103/fb5d4c8b3e10/bmjoq-14-3-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7dfc/12273103/a12a85e563ce/bmjoq-14-3-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Using Quality Improvement to improve serious incident reporting in the English NHS.利用质量改进提升英国国民医疗服务体系(NHS)中严重事件报告的质量
BMJ Open Qual. 2025 Jul 16;14(3):e003234. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003234.
2
Accreditation through the eyes of nurse managers: an infinite staircase or a phenomenon that evaporates like water.护士长眼中的认证:是无尽的阶梯还是如流水般消逝的现象。
J Health Organ Manag. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2025-0029.
3
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
4
Addressing Inequalities in Long Covid Healthcare: A Mixed-Methods Study on Building Inclusive Services.解决长期新冠医疗保健中的不平等问题:一项关于建立包容性服务的混合方法研究。
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70336. doi: 10.1111/hex.70336.
5
A model of occupational stress to assess impact of COVID-19 on critical care and redeployed nurses: a mixed-methods study.一种评估 COVID-19 对重症护理和重新调配护士影响的职业压力模型:一项混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Dec 18:1-32. doi: 10.3310/PWRT8714.
6
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
7
Quality improvement strategies for diabetes care: Effects on outcomes for adults living with diabetes.糖尿病护理质量改进策略:对成年糖尿病患者结局的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 31;5(5):CD014513. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014513.
8
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
9
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
10
Housing improvements for health and associated socio-economic outcomes.改善住房对健康及相关社会经济成果的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Feb 28(2):CD008657. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008657.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Investigators are human too: outcome bias and perceptions of individual culpability in patient safety incident investigations.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2025 Feb 10. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017926.
2
Risk Controls Identified in Action Plans Following Serious Incident Investigations in Secondary Care: A Qualitative Study.二级保健严重事件调查后行动计划中的风险控制:一项定性研究。
J Patient Saf. 2024 Sep 1;20(6):440-447. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000001238. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
3
A content analysis of contributory factors reported in serious incident investigation reports in hospital care.对医院护理中严重事件调查报告中报告的促成因素进行内容分析。
Clin Med (Lond). 2022 Sep;22(5):423-433. doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2022-0042. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
4
Improving access and flow within Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services: a collaborative learning system approach.改善儿童和青少年心理健康服务的可及性和流程:一种协作学习系统方法。
BMJ Open Qual. 2020 Nov;9(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000832.
5
Advancing the Culture of Patient Safety and Quality Improvement.推进患者安全文化与质量改进。
Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2020 Jul-Sep;16(3):192-198. doi: 10.14797/mdcj-16-3-192.
6
Using data for improvement.利用数据促进改进。
BMJ. 2019 Feb 15;364:l189. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l189.
7
Improving access to services through a collaborative learning system at East London NHS Foundation Trust.通过东伦敦国民保健服务基金会信托基金的协作学习系统改善服务获取途径。
BMJ Open Qual. 2018 Jul 30;7(3):e000337. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000337. eCollection 2018.
8
Can Patient Safety Incident Reports Be Used to Compare Hospital Safety? Results from a Quantitative Analysis of the English National Reporting and Learning System Data.患者安全事件报告能否用于比较医院安全性?对英国国家报告与学习系统数据的定量分析结果
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 9;10(12):e0144107. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144107. eCollection 2015.
9
Patient safety incident reporting: a qualitative study of thoughts and perceptions of experts 15 years after 'To Err is Human'.患者安全事件报告:“人非圣贤,孰能无过” 15 年后专家的想法和看法的定性研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Feb;25(2):92-9. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004405. Epub 2015 Jul 27.
10
Feedback from incident reporting: information and action to improve patient safety.事件报告的反馈:用于提高患者安全的信息与行动
Qual Saf Health Care. 2009 Feb;18(1):11-21. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.024166.