Suppr超能文献

采用糖皮质激素单一疗法对Ⅰ/Ⅱ级狼疮性肾炎进行诱导治疗,与更高的复发率和更差的肾脏预后相关。

Induction therapy for class I/II lupus nephritis with glucocorticoid monotherapy associates with higher relapse and poorer kidney outcomes.

作者信息

Jia Xiuzhi, Xiang Wang, Peng Huajing, Yu Jianwen, Wang Xin, Ye Hongjian, Wu Haishan, Tang Ruihan, Xia Xi, Chen Wei

机构信息

Department of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.

NHC Key Laboratory of Clinical Nephrology (Sun Yat-Sen University) and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Nephrology, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Clin Kidney J. 2025 Jul 7;18(7):sfaf171. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfaf171. eCollection 2025 Jul.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of glucocorticoid (GC) in combination with other immunosuppressive therapy for class I/II lupus nephritis (LN) remains controversial.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed 107 biopsy-proven class I/II LN patients who had survival follow-up data from January 1996 to March 2023 and further assessed 96 patients with available treatment response data. These patients received GC alone (GC monotherapy) or GC in combination with another immunosuppressant (combination therapy) as induction therapy. The primary outcome was renal relapse and the secondary outcome was end-stage renal disease (ESRD) or all-cause mortality. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare the cumulative renal relapse rate and long-term renal outcomes between the two treatment groups. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify the risk factors for renal relapse.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 112 months [interquartile range (IQR) 35.5-189.0], 96 patients had available treatment response data. All patients had complete or partial remission, with 78 (81.3%) achieving complete remission (CR). No significant difference in CR rate was observed between the GC monotherapy and combination therapy groups (82.1% versus 80.7%,  = .868). However, the cumulative renal relapse rate was significantly higher in the GC monotherapy group (logrank  = .004). GC monotherapy {hazard ratio [HR] 2.71 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.28-5.75],  = .009} and partial remission after induction therapy [HR 4.17 (95% CI 1.78-9.80),  = .001] were independent risk factors for renal relapse. After a median follow-up time of 156 months (IQR 76.0-199.0), four patients (3.7%) developed ESRD, all in the GC monotherapy group. Long-term renal outcome in the GC monotherapy group was significantly poorer, with 5-, 10-, 15- and 20-year renal survival rates of 100.0%, 93.9%, 90.4% and 90.4%, respectively ( = .025).

CONCLUSION

Class I/II LN patients treated with GC monotherapy have higher renal relapse rates and poorer long-term renal outcomes compared with those receiving GC in combination with other immunosuppressants as induction therapy.

摘要

背景

糖皮质激素(GC)联合其他免疫抑制疗法治疗Ⅰ/Ⅱ型狼疮性肾炎(LN)的疗效仍存在争议。

方法

我们回顾性分析了1996年1月至2023年3月有生存随访数据的107例经活检证实的Ⅰ/Ⅱ型LN患者,并进一步评估了96例有可用治疗反应数据的患者。这些患者接受单独使用GC(GC单药治疗)或GC联合另一种免疫抑制剂(联合治疗)作为诱导治疗。主要结局是肾脏复发,次要结局是终末期肾病(ESRD)或全因死亡率。采用Kaplan-Meier分析比较两组治疗的累积肾脏复发率和长期肾脏结局。进行Cox回归分析以确定肾脏复发的危险因素。

结果

在中位随访112个月[四分位间距(IQR)35.5 - 189.0]期间,96例患者有可用治疗反应数据。所有患者均达到完全或部分缓解,其中78例(81.3%)达到完全缓解(CR)。GC单药治疗组和联合治疗组的CR率无显著差异(82.1%对80.7%,P = 0.868)。然而,GC单药治疗组的累积肾脏复发率显著更高(对数秩检验P = 0.004)。GC单药治疗{风险比[HR] 2.71 [95%置信区间(CI)1.28 - 5.75],P = 0.009}和诱导治疗后部分缓解[HR 4.17(95% CI 1.78 - 9.80),P = 0.001]是肾脏复发的独立危险因素。在中位随访时间156个月(IQR 76.0 - 199.0)后,4例患者(3.7%)发展为ESRD,均在GC单药治疗组。GC单药治疗组的长期肾脏结局显著较差,5年、10年、15年和20年的肾脏生存率分别为100.0%、93.9%、90.4%和90.4%(P = 0.025)。

结论

与接受GC联合其他免疫抑制剂作为诱导治疗的患者相比,接受GC单药治疗的Ⅰ/Ⅱ型LN患者肾脏复发率更高,长期肾脏结局更差。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb4a/12264484/3e31d9667f19/sfaf171fig1g.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验