Johri Parul, Charlesworth Brian
Department of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC 27599, United States.
Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC 27599, United States.
bioRxiv. 2025 Jul 9:2025.02.19.639162. doi: 10.1101/2025.02.19.639162.
In the companion paper to this, we examined the consequences for patterns of linkage disequilibrium of the "gene" model of fitness, which postulates that the effects of recessive or partially recessive deleterious mutations located at different sites within a gene fail to complement each other. Here, we examine the consequences of the gene model for the genetic and inbreeding loads, using both analytical and simulation methods, and contrast it with the frequently used "sites" model that allows allelic complementation. We show that the gene model results in a slightly lower genetic load, but a much smaller inbreeding load, than the sites model, implying that standard predictions of mutational contributions to inbreeding depression may be overestimates. Synergistic epistasis between pairs of mutations was also modeled, and shown to considerably reduce the inbreeding load for both the gene and sites models. The theoretical results are discussed in relation to data on inbreeding load in The widespread assumption that inbreeding depression is largely due to deleterious mutations should be re-examined in the light of our findings.
在与此相关的配套论文中,我们研究了适合度“基因”模型对连锁不平衡模式的影响,该模型假定位于一个基因内不同位点的隐性或部分隐性有害突变的效应无法相互互补。在此,我们使用分析方法和模拟方法研究了基因模型对遗传负荷和近亲繁殖负荷的影响,并将其与允许等位基因互补的常用“位点”模型进行对比。我们表明,与位点模型相比,基因模型导致的遗传负荷略低,但近亲繁殖负荷要小得多,这意味着对近亲繁殖衰退的突变贡献的标准预测可能高估了。还对成对突变之间的协同上位性进行了建模,并表明其会大幅降低基因模型和位点模型的近亲繁殖负荷。结合关于近亲繁殖负荷的数据对理论结果进行了讨论。鉴于我们的研究结果,应重新审视近亲繁殖衰退主要归因于有害突变这一广泛存在的假设。