• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实时定量聚合酶链反应(RT-qPCR)与数字滴度聚合酶链反应(RT-ddPCR)在评估废水中模型病毒方面的比较

Comparison of RT-qPCR and RT-ddPCR on Assessing Model Viruses in Wastewater.

作者信息

Youssfi Wafa, Zhang Wen

机构信息

Department of Civil Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas, USA.

出版信息

Water Environ Res. 2025 Jul;97(7):e70146. doi: 10.1002/wer.70146.

DOI:10.1002/wer.70146
PMID:40673468
Abstract

There is an increasing demand for quantifying viral loads in diverse wastewater systems using polymerase chain reaction (PCR). This study evaluates the performance of two commonly used workflows: reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) and reverse transcription droplet digital PCR (RT-ddPCR) in wastewater. We compared the two methods by measuring a model virus, Pseudomonas phage Φ6 (Phi6) spiked in both real and synthetic wastewater samples. Real sewage was collected from various treatment stages at the Westside Wastewater Treatment Facility in Fayetteville, AR. Protocols, including PCR with and without RNA extraction from wastewater samples, were tested. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to systematically spike a model virus into wastewater collected from multiple treatment stages, enabling a comprehensive assessment of viral quantification across matrices with distinct physical and chemical characteristics. Findings reveal that both methods demonstrated similar performance for detecting high and medium viral loads. However, RT-ddPCR showed significantly greater sensitivity for low viral loads, reliably detecting trace levels of viral particles where RT-qPCR struggled with detection. RT-ddPCR measurement on extracted wastewater samples also demonstrated improved performance against inhibitors; however, its detection was more impacted by water quality for samples without RNA extraction. Although RT-ddPCR entails higher costs and longer processing time, its superior sensitivity and resilience to sample contaminants when used with RNA extraction underscore its value for precise viral monitoring in wastewater applications.

摘要

使用聚合酶链反应(PCR)对各种废水系统中的病毒载量进行量化的需求日益增加。本研究评估了两种常用工作流程:逆转录定量PCR(RT-qPCR)和逆转录液滴数字PCR(RT-ddPCR)在废水中的性能。我们通过测量添加到真实和合成废水样本中的模型病毒——铜绿假单胞菌噬菌体Φ6(Phi6)来比较这两种方法。真实污水取自阿肯色州费耶特维尔市西区污水处理设施的各个处理阶段。测试了包括从废水样本中提取RNA和不提取RNA的PCR在内的方案。据我们所知,这是第一项将模型病毒系统地添加到从多个处理阶段收集的废水中的研究,从而能够全面评估不同物理和化学特性基质中的病毒定量。研究结果表明,两种方法在检测高和中等病毒载量时表现出相似的性能。然而,RT-ddPCR对低病毒载量显示出显著更高的灵敏度,能够可靠地检测到RT-qPCR难以检测到的痕量病毒颗粒。对提取的废水样本进行RT-ddPCR测量也显示出对抑制剂的性能有所改善;然而,对于未提取RNA的样本,其检测受水质的影响更大。尽管RT-ddPCR成本更高、处理时间更长,但与RNA提取一起使用时,其卓越的灵敏度和对样本污染物的耐受性突出了其在废水应用中进行精确病毒监测的价值。

相似文献

1
Comparison of RT-qPCR and RT-ddPCR on Assessing Model Viruses in Wastewater.实时定量聚合酶链反应(RT-qPCR)与数字滴度聚合酶链反应(RT-ddPCR)在评估废水中模型病毒方面的比较
Water Environ Res. 2025 Jul;97(7):e70146. doi: 10.1002/wer.70146.
2
Laboratory-based molecular test alternatives to RT-PCR for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.基于实验室的分子检测替代 RT-PCR 用于 SARS-CoV-2 感染的诊断。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Oct 14;10(10):CD015618. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015618.
3
Validation of an Optimised Method for Quantitative Detection of Hepatitis E Virus in Pork Sausage.猪肉香肠中戊型肝炎病毒定量检测优化方法的验证
Food Environ Virol. 2025 Jun 2;17(2):33. doi: 10.1007/s12560-025-09645-3.
4
Droplet digital RT-PCR method for SARS-CoV-2 variants detection in clinical and wastewater samples.用于临床和废水样本中SARS-CoV-2变体检测的液滴数字逆转录PCR方法。
Front Microbiol. 2025 Jul 3;16:1635733. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1635733. eCollection 2025.
5
The effect of sample site and collection procedure on identification of SARS-CoV-2 infection.样本采集部位和采集程序对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)感染鉴定的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 16;12(12):CD014780. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014780.
6
Rapid, point-of-care antigen tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.用于 SARS-CoV-2 感染诊断的快速、即时抗原检测。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 22;7(7):CD013705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013705.pub3.
7
Diagnostic test accuracy and cost-effectiveness of tests for codeletion of chromosomal arms 1p and 19q in people with glioma.染色体臂 1p 和 19q 缺失的检测在胶质瘤患者中的诊断准确性和成本效益。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 2;3(3):CD013387. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013387.pub2.
8
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
9
Antibody tests for identification of current and past infection with SARS-CoV-2.抗体检测用于鉴定 SARS-CoV-2 的现症感染和既往感染。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 17;11(11):CD013652. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013652.pub2.
10
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.