Suppr超能文献

美国预防服务工作组在子痫前期风险评估和阿司匹林预防中的作用。

Utility of the US Preventive Services Task Force for Preeclampsia Risk Assessment and Aspirin Prophylaxis.

作者信息

McElrath Thomas F, Jeyabalan Arun, Khodursky Arkady, Moe Alison B, Lee Manfred, Jain Maneesh, Goetzl Laura, Sutton Elizabeth F, Simmons Pamela M, Saade George R, Saad Antonio, Pacheco Luis D, Park-Hwang Esther, Frolova Antonina I, Carter Ebony B, Collier Ai-Ris Y, Kiefer Daniel G, Berghella Vincenzo, Boelig Rupsa C, Elovitz Michal A, Gyamfi-Bannerman Cynthia, Biggio Joseph R, Rood Kara, Grobman William A, Haverty Carrie, Rasmussen Morten

机构信息

Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Brigham Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jul 1;8(7):e2521792. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.21792.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines on preeclampsia risk assessment and aspirin prophylaxis (AP) have not been evaluated for clinical utility.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate which characteristics in the USPSTF guidelines identify risk status and the association of preeclampsia risk with AP recommendations.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This observational cohort study enrolled from July 2020 to March 2023 with data analysis performed from October to December 2024. Enrollment occurred at 11 centers throughout the US or via direct-to-participant recruitment. Pregnant participants aged 18 years or older with a singleton pregnancy less than 22 weeks' gestation were selected via convenience sampling.

EXPOSURE

The exposures were clinical factors abstracted from medical records by research coordinators, which were stratified according to USPSTF definitions of low, moderate (parity, advanced maternal age [AMA], race, and body mass index), and high (chronic hypertension, prior preeclampsia, type 1 or 2 diabetes, kidney disease, and/or autoimmune conditions) risk.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Data collected included AP recommendation, presence of USPSTF-defined moderate risk factors or high risk factors, and any preeclampsia diagnosis. Effect sizes and relative risk (RR) were calculated within risk strata.

RESULTS

Of 5684 participants (median [IQR] age, 30.9 [26.4-34.6] years; 267 [4.1%] Asian; 1191 [21.0%] Black; 990 Hispanic [17.4%]; 2764 [48.6%] White; and 472 [8.3%] with other race or ethnicity), 5046 (88.8%) were at increased risk of preeclampsia (3996 [70.3%] at moderate risk and 1050 [18.5%] at high risk). A total of 2438 participants (43.1%) received an AP recommendation. The overall preeclampsia rate was 12.1% (685 participants). The PE rates specific to USPSTF categories were 3.0% for those at low risk (19 of 638 participants), 10.5% for those at moderate risk (419 of 3996 patients), and 23.5% for those at high risk (247 of 1050 participants). Among individuals with 2 or more moderate risk factors but without any high risk factor, nulliparity was associated with significantly increased risk of preeclampsia (RR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.35-1.62; P < .001), while AMA was associated with decreased risk (RR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.65-0.96; P = .02); there was no association with obesity (RR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.01-1.22; P = .048) or Black race (RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.80-1.14; P = .63). Of 1044 participants with any high risk factors, 856 (82.0%) were recommended AP and of 634 at low risk, 538 (85.9%) were not recommended AP. In contrast, of 1942 participants with 1 moderate risk factor, 463 (23.8%) were recommended AP, and of 2032 with 2 or more moderate risk factors, 1024 (50.4%) were recommended AP.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this prospective cohort study of 5684 singleton pregnancies, 89% of the population was assessed as having increased risk (moderate or high) of preeclampsia by USPSTF criteria. These findings suggest that moderate risk factors in the absence of high risk factors show no or low value for estimating the risk of developing preeclampsia, leading to nonspecific recommendations of AP in the moderate risk category.

摘要

重要性

美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)关于子痫前期风险评估和阿司匹林预防(AP)的指南尚未进行临床实用性评估。

目的

评估USPSTF指南中的哪些特征可识别风险状态以及子痫前期风险与AP推荐之间的关联。

设计、设置和参与者:这项观察性队列研究于2020年7月至2023年3月招募,数据分析于2024年10月至12月进行。招募在全美11个中心进行,或通过直接招募参与者的方式进行。通过便利抽样选择年龄在18岁及以上、单胎妊娠且妊娠少于22周的孕妇参与者。

暴露因素

暴露因素是研究协调员从医疗记录中提取的临床因素,这些因素根据USPSTF对低、中(产次、高龄孕产妇[AMA]、种族和体重指数)和高(慢性高血压、既往子痫前期、1型或2型糖尿病、肾脏疾病和/或自身免疫性疾病)风险的定义进行分层。

主要结局和测量指标

收集的数据包括AP推荐、是否存在USPSTF定义的中度风险因素或高度风险因素以及任何子痫前期诊断。在风险分层内计算效应量和相对风险(RR)。

结果

5684名参与者(年龄中位数[四分位间距]为30.9[26.4 - 34.6]岁;267名[4.1%]为亚洲人;1191名[21.0%]为黑人;990名西班牙裔[17.4%];2764名[48.6%]为白人;472名[8.3%]为其他种族或族裔)中,5046名(88.8%)子痫前期风险增加(3996名[70.3%]为中度风险,1050名[18.5%]为高度风险)。共有2438名参与者(43.1%)接受了AP推荐。子痫前期总体发生率为12.1%(685名参与者)。USPSTF各类别子痫前期发生率分别为低风险者3.0%(638名参与者中的19名)、中度风险者10.5%(3996名患者中的419名)和高度风险者23.5%(1050名参与者中的247名)。在有2个或更多中度风险因素但无任何高度风险因素的个体中,初产与子痫前期风险显著增加相关(RR,1.48;95%CI,1.35 - 1.62;P < .001),而AMA与风险降低相关(RR,0.79;95%CI,0.65 - 0.96;P = .02);与肥胖(RR,1.11;95%CI,1.01 - 1.22;P = .048)或黑人种族(RR,0.95;95%CI,0.80 - 1.14;P = .63)无关联。在1044名有任何高度风险因素的参与者中,856名(82.0%)被推荐使用AP,在634名低风险参与者中,538名(85.9%)未被推荐使用AP。相比之下,在1942名有1个中度风险因素的参与者中,463名(23.8%)被推荐使用AP,在2032名有2个或更多中度风险因素的参与者中,1024名(50.4%)被推荐使用AP。

结论和相关性

在这项对5684例单胎妊娠的前瞻性队列研究中,根据USPSTF标准,89%的人群被评估为子痫前期风险增加(中度或高度)。这些发现表明,在没有高度风险因素的情况下,中度风险因素在估计子痫前期发生风险方面价值不大或没有价值,导致对中度风险类别中非特异性的AP推荐。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0dfa/12272286/7d9d024ac8a0/jamanetwopen-e2521792-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验