Suppr超能文献

健康中心环境下的无家可归、患者导航与肺癌筛查:一项随机临床试验的亚组分析

Homelessness, Patient Navigation, and Lung Cancer Screening in a Health Center Setting: A Subgroup Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Baggett Travis P, Sporn Nora, Barbosa Teixeira Joana, Rodriguez Elijah C, Anandakugan Nillani, Little Bailey R, Chang Yuchiao, Park Elyse R, Rigotti Nancy A, Fine Danielle R

机构信息

Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.

Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jul 1;8(7):e2519780. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.19780.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Lung cancer is a major cause of death among people who experience homelessness. Patient navigation is an effective strategy for promoting lung cancer screening (LCS) in Health Care for the Homeless (HCH) settings, but little is known about whether the impact of this intervention differs for patients currently vs formerly experiencing homelessness.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the effect of LCS patient navigation on individuals currently vs formerly experiencing homelessness, and to explore how navigation process measures differ for these subgroups.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This is a subgroup analysis of the Investigating Navigation to Help Advance Lung Equity (INHALE) pragmatic randomized clinical trial of LCS patient navigation. The INHALE trial was conducted at Boston Health Care for the Homeless Program (BHCHP), a federally qualified health center serving nearly 10 000 patients who have experienced homelessness annually. The study included BHCHP primary care patients with a lifetime history of homelessness who were proficient in English and eligible for LCS under pre-2022 Medicare coverage criteria. The study was conducted between November 20, 2020, and March 29, 2023.

EXPOSURE

Current vs former homelessness, defined by self-reported responses to a detailed residential inventory. Sensitivity analyses further categorized individuals who formerly experienced homelessness as having stable or unstable housing.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was verified receipt of a 1-time LCS low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) scan within 6 months after randomization. The risk difference (RD) in primary outcome attainment between navigation and usual care within each homelessness subgroup was calculated, and these RDs were compared by testing the interaction between study group and homelessness status in a linear binomial regression model with the identity link.

RESULTS

This study included 260 participants (mean [SD] age, 60.5 [4.7] years; 184 male individuals [70.8%]). At baseline, 84 patients (32.3%) were currently experiencing homelessness and 176 (67.7%) had formerly experienced homelessness. Patient navigation significantly increased LCS LDCT completion among both those currently (15 of 56 [26.8%] vs 2 of 28 [7.1%]; P = .04) and formerly (60 of 117 [51.3%] vs 6 of 59 [10.2%]; P < .001) experiencing homelessness. However, the treatment effect was significantly smaller among participants currently experiencing homelessness (RD, 19.7% vs 41.1%; P = .03), such that a disparity in LCS completion between these subgroups emerged under the navigation condition. Navigation process measures highlighted communication challenges with participants currently experiencing homelessness. In sensitivity analyses, LCS LDCT completion rates and navigation process measures were generally similar for stably vs unstably housed participants who formerly experienced homelessness.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this subgroup analysis of a randomized clinical trial, patient navigation increased LCS participation among both patients currently and formerly experiencing homelessness; however, the effect size was smaller for those currently experiencing homelessness. Further improving cancer outcomes among HCH patients may require refinement of the patient navigation intervention, coupled with policy efforts to promote housing attainment among people experiencing homelessness.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04308226.

摘要

重要性

肺癌是无家可归者死亡的主要原因。患者导航是在无家可归者医疗保健(HCH)环境中促进肺癌筛查(LCS)的有效策略,但对于这种干预措施对当前与曾经无家可归的患者的影响是否不同,人们知之甚少。

目的

研究LCS患者导航对当前与曾经无家可归的个体的影响,并探讨这些亚组在导航过程指标上的差异。

设计、设置和参与者:这是一项对肺癌筛查患者导航的“助力推进肺部公平性调查导航(INHALE)”实用随机临床试验的亚组分析。INHALE试验在波士顿无家可归者医疗保健项目(BHCHP)进行,该项目是一家联邦合格的健康中心,每年为近10000名有过无家可归经历的患者提供服务。该研究纳入了有终身无家可归史、精通英语且符合2022年前医疗保险覆盖标准下LCS资格的BHCHP初级保健患者。研究于2020年11月20日至2023年3月29日进行。

暴露因素

当前与曾经无家可归,通过对详细居住情况清单的自我报告回答来定义。敏感性分析进一步将曾经无家可归的个体分类为住房稳定或不稳定。

主要结局和测量指标

主要结局是在随机分组后6个月内核实是否接受了1次LCS低剂量计算机断层扫描(LDCT)。计算每个无家可归亚组中导航组与常规护理组在主要结局达成方面的风险差异(RD),并通过在具有恒等连接的线性二项回归模型中检验研究组与无家可归状态之间的相互作用来比较这些RD。

结果

本研究纳入了260名参与者(平均[标准差]年龄,60.5[4.7]岁;184名男性[70.8%])。在基线时,84名患者(32.3%)当前无家可归,176名(67.7%)曾经无家可归。患者导航显著提高了当前(56名中的15名[26.8%]对28名中的2名[7.1%];P = 0.04)和曾经(117名中的60名[51.3%]对59名中的6名[10.2%];P < 0.001)无家可归者的LCS LDCT完成率。然而,当前无家可归的参与者的治疗效果显著较小(RD,19.7%对41.1%;P = 0.03),因此在导航条件下这些亚组之间在LCS完成方面出现了差异。导航过程指标突出了与当前无家可归参与者的沟通挑战。在敏感性分析中,曾经无家可归且住房稳定与不稳定参与者的LCS LDCT完成率和导航过程指标总体相似。

结论与相关性

在这项随机临床试验的亚组分析中,患者导航提高了当前和曾经无家可归患者的LCS参与度;然而,对于当前无家可归的患者,效应大小较小。进一步改善HCH患者的癌症结局可能需要完善患者导航干预措施,同时辅以促进无家可归者获得住房的政策努力。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT04308226。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95ba/12272284/1852978940b9/jamanetwopen-e2519780-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验