• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在肯塔基州东部一家符合联邦资格的无家可归者诊所提高结直肠癌筛查的有效性和成本

The Effectiveness and Cost to Improve Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Federally Qualified Homeless Clinic in Eastern Kentucky.

作者信息

Hardin Vicky, Tangka Florence K L, Wood Teri, Boisseau Brian, Hoover Sonja, DeGroff Amy, Boehm Jennifer, Subramanian Sujha

机构信息

Little Flower Clinic, Hazard, KY, USA.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.

出版信息

Health Promot Pract. 2020 Nov;21(6):905-909. doi: 10.1177/1524839920954165. Epub 2020 Sep 29.

DOI:10.1177/1524839920954165
PMID:32990049
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7894067/
Abstract

The objective of this study was to analyze the effectiveness and cost of patient incentives, together with patient navigation and patient reminders, to increase fecal immunochemical test (FIT) kit return rates and colorectal cancer screening uptake in one federally qualified health center (FQHC) in Appalachia. This FQHC is a designated homeless clinic, as 79.7% of its patient population are homeless. We collected process, outcome, and cost data from the FQHC for two time periods: usual care (September 2016-August 2017) and implementation (September 2017-September 2018). We reported the FIT kit return rate, the increase in return rate, and the additional number of individual screens. We also calculated the incremental cost per additional screen. The patient incentive program, with patient navigation and patient reminders, increased the number of FIT kits returned from the usual care period to the implementation period. The return rate increased by 25.9 percentage points (from 21.7% to 47.6%) with an additional 91 people screened at an incremental cost of $134.61 per screen. A patient incentive program, together with the assistance of patient navigators and supplemented with patient reminders, can help improve CRC screening uptake among vulnerable and homeless populations.

摘要

本研究的目的是分析患者激励措施以及患者导航和患者提醒的有效性和成本,以提高阿巴拉契亚地区一家联邦合格医疗中心(FQHC)的粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)试剂盒回收率和结直肠癌筛查接受率。该FQHC是一家指定的无家可归者诊所,其患者中有79.7%是无家可归者。我们收集了该FQHC在两个时间段的过程、结果和成本数据:常规护理期(2016年9月至2017年8月)和实施期(2017年9月至2018年9月)。我们报告了FIT试剂盒回收率、回收率的提高以及额外的个体筛查数量。我们还计算了每增加一次筛查的增量成本。患者激励计划,加上患者导航和患者提醒,增加了从常规护理期到实施期返回的FIT试剂盒数量。回收率提高了25.9个百分点(从21.7%提高到47.6%),另外有91人接受了筛查,每筛查一人的增量成本为134.61美元。患者激励计划,在患者导航员的协助下并辅以患者提醒,可以帮助提高弱势群体和无家可归者人群的结直肠癌筛查接受率。

相似文献

1
The Effectiveness and Cost to Improve Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Federally Qualified Homeless Clinic in Eastern Kentucky.在肯塔基州东部一家符合联邦资格的无家可归者诊所提高结直肠癌筛查的有效性和成本
Health Promot Pract. 2020 Nov;21(6):905-909. doi: 10.1177/1524839920954165. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
2
Cost and Effectiveness of Reminders to Promote Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake in Rural Federally Qualified Health Centers in West Virginia.西弗吉尼亚州农村联邦合格健康中心促进结直肠癌筛查的提醒措施的成本与效果
Health Promot Pract. 2020 Nov;21(6):891-897. doi: 10.1177/1524839920954164. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
3
Examining the Effectiveness of Provider Incentives to Increase CRC Screening Uptake in Neighborhood Healthcare: A California Federally Qualified Health Center.考察医疗服务提供者激励措施在社区医疗中提高结直肠癌筛查接受率的有效性:以加利福尼亚州一家联邦合格健康中心为例
Health Promot Pract. 2020 Nov;21(6):898-904. doi: 10.1177/1524839920954166. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
4
Improving Fecal Immunochemical Test Return Rates: A Colorectal Cancer Screening Quality Improvement Project in a Multisite Federally Qualified Health Center.提高粪便免疫化学检测(Fecal Immunochemical Test,FIT)的回检率:在一个多地点联邦合格健康中心开展的结直肠癌筛查质量改进项目。
Health Promot Pract. 2023 Jul;24(4):740-754. doi: 10.1177/15248399221083294. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
5
Effectiveness and Cost of Implementing Evidence-Based Interventions to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Among an Underserved Population in Chicago.在芝加哥一个服务不足的人群中实施循证干预措施以提高结直肠癌筛查率的有效性和成本
Health Promot Pract. 2020 Nov;21(6):884-890. doi: 10.1177/1524839920954162. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
6
Effectiveness and cost of multilayered colorectal cancer screening promotion interventions at federally qualified health centers in Washington State.华盛顿州联邦合格健康中心实施的多层结直肠癌筛查推广干预措施的效果和成本。
Cancer. 2018 Nov 1;124(21):4121-4129. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31693. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
7
Barriers and Facilitators of Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC).联邦合格医疗中心(FQHC)中结直肠癌筛查的障碍与促进因素
J Am Board Fam Med. 2019 Mar-Apr;32(2):180-190. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.02.180205.
8
Monthly Variations in Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests Among Federally Qualified Health Center Patients in Missouri: Quality Improvement Project.密苏里州联邦合格健康中心患者结直肠癌筛查测试的月度变化:质量改进项目
JMIR Cancer. 2025 Mar 19;11:e64809. doi: 10.2196/64809.
9
Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of Mailed FIT in a Safety Net Clinic Population.邮寄粪便免疫化学检测在一个医疗保障人群中的效果和成本效益。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Nov;36(11):3441-3447. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06691-y. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
10
Mailed FIT (fecal immunochemical test), navigation or patient reminders? Using microsimulation to inform selection of interventions to increase colorectal cancer screening in Medicaid enrollees.邮寄粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)、导航或患者提醒?利用微模拟为选择干预措施提供信息,以增加医疗补助计划参保者的结直肠癌筛查。
Prev Med. 2019 Dec;129S:105836. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105836. Epub 2019 Oct 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Interventions to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake in Rural Settings: A Scoping Review.提高农村地区结直肠癌筛查参与率的干预措施:一项范围综述
Prev Chronic Dis. 2025 Jul 17;22:E44. doi: 10.5888/pcd22.250025.
2
Homelessness, Patient Navigation, and Lung Cancer Screening in a Health Center Setting: A Subgroup Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.健康中心环境下的无家可归、患者导航与肺癌筛查:一项随机临床试验的亚组分析
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jul 1;8(7):e2519780. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.19780.
3
Legal-involved veterans are less likely to receive guideline-concordant colorectal cancer screening.涉及法律问题的退伍军人接受符合指南的结直肠癌筛查的可能性较小。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Mar 4;25(1):333. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12490-6.
4
Addressing Colorectal Cancer Disparities in Unhoused Populations: A Call for Equitable Access and Compassionate Care.解决无家可归人群中的结直肠癌差异问题:呼吁公平获取医疗服务和给予关怀备至的护理。
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2024 May 2;38(1):5-10. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1786531. eCollection 2025 Jan.
5
Effectiveness of colonoscopy, immune fecal occult blood testing, and risk-graded screening strategies in colorectal cancer screening.结肠镜检查、免疫粪便潜血检测及风险分级筛查策略在结直肠癌筛查中的有效性。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Jul 27;16(7):2270-2280. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i7.2270.
6
Feasibility and efficacy of a novel audiovisual tool to increase colorectal cancer screening among rural Appalachian Kentucky adults.一种新型视听工具在增加肯塔基州阿巴拉契亚农村成年人结直肠癌筛查中的可行性和效果。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jul 11;12:1415607. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1415607. eCollection 2024.
7
Prediction and analysis of albumin-bilirubin score combined with liver function index and carcinoembryonic antigen on liver metastasis of colorectal cancer.白蛋白-胆红素评分联合肝功能指标及癌胚抗原对结直肠癌肝转移的预测与分析
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Jun 27;16(6):1670-1680. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i6.1670.
8
Assessing and Addressing the Determinants of Appalachian Population Health: A Scoping Review.评估与应对阿巴拉契亚地区人口健康的决定因素:一项范围综述
J Appalach Health. 2023 Dec 1;5(3):85-102. doi: 10.13023/jah.0503.07. eCollection 2023.
9
Integrated interventions and supporting activities to increase uptake of multiple cancer screenings: conceptual framework, determinants of implementation success, measurement challenges, and research priorities.增加多种癌症筛查接受度的综合干预措施及支持活动:概念框架、实施成功的决定因素、测量挑战及研究重点
Implement Sci Commun. 2022 Oct 5;3(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s43058-022-00353-8.
10
Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance in Homeless Patients: A Case Report and Policy Recommendations.无家可归患者进行结直肠癌筛查和监测的障碍:病例报告及政策建议
Ann Surg Open. 2022 Sep;3(3). doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000183. Epub 2022 Aug 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Cost and Effectiveness of Reminders to Promote Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake in Rural Federally Qualified Health Centers in West Virginia.西弗吉尼亚州农村联邦合格健康中心促进结直肠癌筛查的提醒措施的成本与效果
Health Promot Pract. 2020 Nov;21(6):891-897. doi: 10.1177/1524839920954164. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
2
Economic Evaluation of Interventions to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening at Federally Qualified Health Centers.联邦合格医疗中心增加结直肠癌筛查干预措施的经济评估
Health Promot Pract. 2020 Nov;21(6):877-883. doi: 10.1177/1524839920954168. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
3
Effectiveness and Cost of Implementing Evidence-Based Interventions to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Among an Underserved Population in Chicago.在芝加哥一个服务不足的人群中实施循证干预措施以提高结直肠癌筛查率的有效性和成本
Health Promot Pract. 2020 Nov;21(6):884-890. doi: 10.1177/1524839920954162. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
4
Variations in Screening Quality in a Federal Colorectal Cancer Screening Program for the Uninsured.联邦无保险人群结直肠癌筛查项目中的筛查质量差异。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2019 May 30;16:E67. doi: 10.5888/pcd16.180452.
5
Trends, Causes, and Outcomes of Hospitalizations for Homeless Individuals: A Retrospective Cohort Study.无家可归者住院的趋势、原因和结果:一项回顾性队列研究。
Med Care. 2019 Jan;57(1):21-27. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001015.
6
Where can colorectal cancer screening interventions have the most impact?结直肠癌筛查干预措施在哪些方面能产生最大影响?
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2015 Aug;24(8):1151-6. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0082. Epub 2015 Jul 8.
7
Understanding Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening in Kentucky.了解肯塔基州结直肠癌筛查的障碍
Prev Chronic Dis. 2015 Jun 18;12:E95. doi: 10.5888/pcd12.140586.
8
Effectiveness of interventions to increase screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers: nine updated systematic reviews for the guide to community preventive services.干预措施提高乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查率的效果:《社区预防服务指南》的 9 项更新系统评价。
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Jul;43(1):97-118. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.04.009.
9
Updated recommendations for client- and provider-oriented interventions to increase breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening.更新后的建议,针对以客户和提供者为导向的干预措施,以增加乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌的筛查。
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Jul;43(1):92-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.04.008.