Frez-Pulgar G, Valdés-Rodríguez Y, Negrier-Seguel V, Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez F, Caceres-Senn M, Glasserman-Morales L, Hochstetter-Diez J
Unidad Funcional de Bioetica, Universidad de La Frontera, Av. Francisco Salazar 01145, 4811230, Temuco, Chile.
Facultad de Administración y Negocios, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Av. Libertador Bernardo O'Higgins 95, 3467524, Talca, Chile.
J Bioeth Inq. 2025 Jul 17. doi: 10.1007/s11673-025-10442-7.
Bioethics has become a crucial discipline in higher education. This study aims to understand the institutionalization of bioethics within this field and examine documented initiatives related to its integration. To achieve this, a systematic mapping was conducted using Petersen and Kitchenham's methodology, analysing 444 relevant articles. The results indicate a higher concentration of studies addressing the institutionalization of bioethics at the undergraduate level (40.5 per cent), with fewer publications focused on the postgraduate level (19.4 per cent). Most of the studies are concentrated in the health sciences (81.3 per cent), while the remainder are distributed among the social sciences, humanities, biological sciences, and engineering. The analysis revealed a significant lack of studies on comparative practices and the use of replicated experiences (2 per cent), as well as limited evidence on the institutionalization of bioethics research in higher education (10.3 per cent). These gaps underscore the need for further research in these areas. Additionally, the integration of active methodologies and educational technologies has enhanced bioethics programmes (21.4 per cent), fostering more interactive and engaged learning environments. This study highlights a critical gap in the implementation of bioethics based on empirically validated experiences. It proposes the development of an implementation model that adapts these experiences to different educational contexts. Cooperation between institutions and the creation of research networks are recommended as key strategies for sharing best practices, thereby facilitating the more effective and widespread integration of bioethics across various educational settings.
生物伦理学已成为高等教育中的一门关键学科。本研究旨在了解生物伦理学在该领域内的制度化情况,并审视与其整合相关的已记录举措。为实现这一目标,采用彼得森和基奇纳姆的方法进行了系统映射,分析了444篇相关文章。结果表明,针对本科层次生物伦理学制度化的研究更为集中(40.5%),关注研究生层次的出版物较少(19.4%)。大多数研究集中在健康科学领域(81.3%),其余分布在社会科学、人文科学、生物科学和工程领域。分析发现严重缺乏关于比较实践和重复经验运用的研究(2%),以及高等教育中生物伦理学研究制度化的证据有限(10.3%)。这些差距凸显了在这些领域进一步开展研究的必要性。此外,积极方法和教育技术的整合提升了生物伦理学课程(21.4%),营造了更具互动性和参与性的学习环境。本研究突出了基于经验验证的经验实施生物伦理学方面的一个关键差距。它提议开发一种实施模式,使这些经验适用于不同的教育背景。建议机构间的合作和研究网络的创建作为分享最佳实践的关键策略,从而促进生物伦理学在各种教育环境中更有效和广泛的整合。