Khan Muhammad Umer, Dawood Muhammad, Malhi Muhammad Abu Darda, Haider Muhammad Haroon, Hussain Ali, Ali Azfar, Qureshi Samreen
Surgery, District Headquarter Hospital, Sheikhupura, Sheikhupura, PAK.
Surgery, Tehsil Headquarter Hospital, Ferozewala, Ferozewala, PAK.
Cureus. 2025 Jun 16;17(6):e86119. doi: 10.7759/cureus.86119. eCollection 2025 Jun.
Background Complex and recurrent urethral strictures present significant surgical challenges, with graft-based urethroplasty being the mainstay of treatment. Optimal graft selection remains controversial, particularly between buccal mucosa and penile skin grafts. Objective To compare clinical outcomes, complication rates, and patient-reported satisfaction following urethroplasty using buccal mucosa versus penile skin grafts. Methods This retrospective cohort study was conducted at Nishtar Hospital, Multan, Pakistan, from January 2022 to December 2024. A total of 178 male patients who underwent substitution urethroplasty were included in the study. Data were retrospectively extracted from electronic medical records and surgical logs. Collected variables included patient demographics (age, comorbid conditions like diabetes or smoking status), stricture characteristics (location, length, etiology, previous treatments), surgical details (graft type, operative time, perioperative complications), and postoperative outcomes. Data were analyzed using SPSS Version 26.0 (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Continuous variables were compared using t-tests and categorical variables using chi-square tests, with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results Surgical success rates were higher in the buccal mucosa group at both 12 months (91 (87.5%) vs. 59 (80.2%)) and 24 months (88 (84.6%) vs. 56 (75.6%)), though differences were not statistically significant. Stricture recurrence and graft contracture were lower in the buccal mucosa group (11 (10.6%) vs. 14 (18.9%)) and (four (3.8%) vs. eight (10.8%)), respectively. International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) improvement was significantly greater with buccal mucosa grafts (p = 0.04), and patient satisfaction rates were also higher. Complication rates were low in both groups, but oral donor site morbidity was observed in 19 (18%) of buccal mucosa patients. Conclusions It is concluded that buccal mucosa grafts offer superior functional outcomes, lower complication rates, and greater patient satisfaction compared to penile skin grafts in the setting of complex or recurrent urethral strictures. Buccal mucosa should be considered the preferred graft material when feasible.
复杂且复发性尿道狭窄带来了重大的手术挑战,基于移植物的尿道成形术是主要的治疗方法。最佳移植物的选择仍存在争议,尤其是在颊黏膜和阴茎皮肤移植物之间。
比较使用颊黏膜与阴茎皮肤移植物进行尿道成形术后的临床结果、并发症发生率及患者报告的满意度。
本回顾性队列研究于2022年1月至2024年12月在巴基斯坦木尔坦的尼什塔尔医院进行。共有178例接受替代尿道成形术的男性患者纳入研究。数据从电子病历和手术记录中回顾性提取。收集的变量包括患者人口统计学信息(年龄、糖尿病等合并症或吸烟状况)、狭窄特征(位置、长度、病因、既往治疗)、手术细节(移植物类型、手术时间、围手术期并发症)及术后结果。使用SPSS 26.0版(IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows,IBM公司,纽约州阿蒙克)进行数据分析。连续变量采用t检验进行比较,分类变量采用卡方检验进行比较,p<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
颊黏膜组在12个月时(91例(87.5%)对59例(80.2%))和24个月时(88例(84.6%)对56例(75.6%))的手术成功率均较高,尽管差异无统计学意义。颊黏膜组的狭窄复发率和移植物挛缩率较低,分别为11例(10.6%)对14例(18.9%)和4例(3.8%)对8例(10.8%)。颊黏膜移植物使国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)改善更为显著(p = 0.04),患者满意度也更高。两组的并发症发生率均较低,但19例(18%)颊黏膜患者出现了口腔供区并发症。
得出结论,在复杂或复发性尿道狭窄的情况下,与阴茎皮肤移植物相比,颊黏膜移植物具有更好的功能结果、更低的并发症发生率和更高的患者满意度。在可行的情况下,颊黏膜应被视为首选的移植物材料。