Knox Matthew Charles, Thiruthaneeswaran Niluja, Zhong George, Brand Alison, Herbst Unine, Flower Emily, Chard Jennifer, Salkeld Alison
Radiation Oncology Network, Western Sydney Local Health District, Westmead, NSW, Australia.
University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2025 Jun 27;54:101001. doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2025.101001. eCollection 2025 Sep.
INTRODUCTION: Whilst an essential component of curative management, cervical brachytherapy is associated with considerable pain and discomfort, with analgesic protocols varying between institutions. We present the first series on adjunctive pudendal nerve block (PNB) in addition to routine anaesthesia. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients receiving brachytherapy for cervical malignancies across two time periods, correlating to the institutional introduction of PNB. Technically, bilateral PNB was performed using 1 % ropivacaine under general anaesthesia and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) was used post-operatively. Median pain scores (11-point numeric rating scale), acceptability of pain (<20 % of recorded scores ≥ 4), opioid requirement and adverse events are reported. Intracavitary with or without interstitial brachytherapy was performed as per EMBRACE-2 protocol. RESULTS: 78 patients receiving 149 brachytherapy episodes were included, of which 95 episodes (64%) utilised PNB. 48% of cases required interstitial needles in both cohorts, with no significant differences in demographics.Median pain scores were lower in the PNB cohort (1 vs. 2.5; p = 0.003). PNB was associated with less episodes of unacceptable pain, as defined above (33 % vs. 63 %; p < 0.001). This benefit was sustained on binomial logistic regression, including such factors as number of interstitial needles, baseline opioid use and applicator model choice.PNB use was also associated with reduced opioid requirement via PCA (p < 0.001) and there were no differences in the incidence of hypotension, respiratory depression or nausea between cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: PNB is an effective and safe adjunct to general anaesthesia and intravenous PCA for cervical brachytherapy, with improved pain and reduced opioid requirements. We advocate for routine use of PNB in addition to multimodal analgesic regimens.
引言:虽然宫颈近距离放射治疗是根治性治疗的重要组成部分,但它会带来相当大的疼痛和不适,各机构的镇痛方案各不相同。我们首次报道了在常规麻醉基础上辅助阴部神经阻滞(PNB)的系列研究。 方法:回顾性分析两个时间段接受宫颈恶性肿瘤近距离放射治疗的患者,这两个时间段与机构引入PNB相关。从技术上讲,在全身麻醉下使用1%罗哌卡因进行双侧PNB,术后使用静脉自控镇痛(PCA)。报告了中位疼痛评分(11分数字评分量表)、疼痛可接受性(记录分数≥4的分数<20%)、阿片类药物需求量和不良事件。根据EMBRACE-2方案进行腔内近距离放射治疗,可联合或不联合组织间近距离放射治疗。 结果:纳入78例接受149次近距离放射治疗的患者,其中95次(64%)使用了PNB。两组中48%的病例需要使用组织间针,人口统计学特征无显著差异。PNB组的中位疼痛评分较低(1分对2.5分;p=0.003)。PNB与上述定义的不可接受疼痛发作较少相关(33%对63%;p<0.001)。在二项逻辑回归中,包括组织间针数量、基线阿片类药物使用和施源器型号选择等因素,这种益处仍然存在。使用PNB还与通过PCA减少阿片类药物需求相关(p<0.001),两组间低血压、呼吸抑制或恶心的发生率无差异。 结论:PNB是宫颈近距离放射治疗全身麻醉和静脉PCA的有效且安全的辅助手段,可改善疼痛并减少阿片类药物需求。我们提倡在多模式镇痛方案之外常规使用PNB。
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2025-6-27
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-11-9
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025-6-4
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-4-13
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-6-4
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-6-5
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-5-21
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016-2-21
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-8-5
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-7-7
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2024-7-1
Radiother Oncol. 2023-7
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2022-4
BJA Educ. 2018-2