• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响因胆道损伤接受手术修复患者早期和晚期结局的因素。

Factors affecting early and late period outcomes in patients undergoing surgical repair due to biliary tract injury.

作者信息

Çoğal İbrahim, Yavuz Burak, Kaycı Yunus, Topal Uğur, Aydın İshak, Saritas Ahmet Gokhan, Dalci Kubilay, Eray İsmail Cem, Akcam Atilgan Tolga, Ülkü Abdullah

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Cukurova University Faculty of Medicine, Adana, Türkiye.

出版信息

Front Surg. 2025 Jul 3;12:1576454. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1576454. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2025.1576454
PMID:40677638
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12267232/
Abstract

AIM

Cholecystectomy is the most common elective abdominal surgery globally. With the advent of laparoscopy, laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become the gold standard. However, this has also led to an increase in biliary tract injuries, a complication with high morbidity and mortality that requires a multidisciplinary treatment approach. This study aims to identify factors influencing postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing surgical repair for biliary tract injuries.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

This study included 66 patients referred to the General Surgery Department of Çukurova University Medical Faculty for biliary tract injuries between January 2005 and June 2022, all of whom underwent hepaticojejunostomy. Demographic data, pre- and post-operative lab values, imaging, and anastomosis types were recorded and analyzed. Early and long-term postoperative outcomes were examined, using the McDonald classification for long-term follow-up.

RESULTS

Of the 66 patients, 18 (27.3%) were male, and 48 (72.7%) were female, with a mean follow-up of 105 ± 58 months. Early postoperative complications developed in 28 patients (42.4%). Diabetes and culture positivity were significantly associated with wound infections. Elevated pre- and post-repair ALP and GGT levels were significantly associated with poorer long-term outcomes according to the McDonald classification. Vascular injury was significantly associated with isolated ALP-GGT elevation. Anastomotic stricture developed in 8 patients (12.1%). Of these, 2 (3%) were successfully managed with balloon dilation.

CONCLUSION

Biliary tract injury is a serious complication post-cholecystectomy, requiring a multidisciplinary approach and follow-up in a hepatobiliary center. Surgeon experience and local risk factors are crucial in managing these injuries.

摘要

目的

胆囊切除术是全球最常见的择期腹部手术。随着腹腔镜技术的出现,腹腔镜胆囊切除术已成为金标准。然而,这也导致了胆道损伤的增加,这是一种发病率和死亡率都很高的并发症,需要多学科治疗方法。本研究旨在确定影响接受胆道损伤手术修复患者术后结局的因素。

材料与方法

本研究纳入了2005年1月至2022年6月间因胆道损伤转诊至库库罗瓦大学医学院普通外科的66例患者,所有患者均接受了肝空肠吻合术。记录并分析人口统计学数据、术前和术后实验室检查值、影像学检查及吻合类型。采用麦克唐纳分类法进行长期随访,检查术后早期和长期结局。

结果

66例患者中,男性18例(27.3%),女性48例(72.7%),平均随访时间为105±58个月。28例患者(42.4%)发生了术后早期并发症。糖尿病和培养阳性与伤口感染显著相关。根据麦克唐纳分类法,修复前后碱性磷酸酶(ALP)和γ-谷氨酰转肽酶(GGT)水平升高与较差的长期结局显著相关。血管损伤与单纯ALP-GGT升高显著相关。8例患者(12.1%)发生吻合口狭窄。其中2例(3%)通过球囊扩张成功治疗。

结论

胆道损伤是胆囊切除术后的严重并发症,需要多学科方法并在肝胆中心进行随访。外科医生经验和局部危险因素在处理这些损伤中至关重要。

相似文献

1
Factors affecting early and late period outcomes in patients undergoing surgical repair due to biliary tract injury.影响因胆道损伤接受手术修复患者早期和晚期结局的因素。
Front Surg. 2025 Jul 3;12:1576454. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1576454. eCollection 2025.
2
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
3
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
4
Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for uncomplicated biliary colic.早期与延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗单纯性胆绞痛
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 30;2013(6):CD007196. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007196.pub3.
5
Morphological, functional and neurological outcomes of craniectomy versus cranial vault remodeling for isolated nonsyndromic synostosis of the sagittal suture: a systematic review.颅骨切除术与颅骨重塑术治疗孤立性非综合征性矢状缝早闭的形态学、功能及神经学预后:一项系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Sep;13(9):309-68. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2470.
6
Management of urinary stones by experts in stone disease (ESD 2025).结石病专家对尿路结石的管理(2025年结石病专家共识)
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2025 Jun 30;97(2):14085. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2025.14085.
7
Transabdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) versus totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for inguinal hernia repair.经腹腹膜前(TAPP)与完全腹膜外(TEP)腹腔镜技术治疗腹股沟疝修补术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jul 4;7(7):CD004703. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004703.pub3.
8
Laparoscopic surgery for elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.择期腹主动脉瘤修复的腹腔镜手术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 4;5(5):CD012302. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012302.pub2.
9
Trocar types in laparoscopy.腹腔镜检查中的套管针类型。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 16;2015(12):CD009814. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009814.pub2.
10
Endovascular treatment for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm.破裂性腹主动脉瘤的血管内治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 26;5(5):CD005261. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005261.pub4.

本文引用的文献

1
Safe Cholecystectomy Multi-society Practice Guideline and State of the Art Consensus Conference on Prevention of Bile Duct Injury During Cholecystectomy.安全胆囊切除术多学会实践指南和预防胆囊切除术中胆管损伤的最新共识会议。
Ann Surg. 2020 Jul;272(1):3-23. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003791.
2
Early Surgical Repair of Bile Duct Injuries following Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: The Sooner the Better.腹腔镜胆囊切除术后胆管损伤的早期手术修复:越快越好。
Surg J (N Y). 2019 Oct 18;5(4):e154-e158. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1697633. eCollection 2019 Oct.
3
Long-Term Impact of Iatrogenic Bile Duct Injury.医源性胆管损伤的长期影响。
Dig Surg. 2020;37(1):10-21. doi: 10.1159/000496432. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
4
Proposed standards for reporting outcomes of treating biliary injuries.报告胆道损伤治疗结果的拟议标准。
HPB (Oxford). 2018 Apr;20(4):370-378. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2017.10.012. Epub 2018 Feb 4.
5
Utility of routine blood tests after elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallstones.有症状胆结石择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术后常规血液检查的效用
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 Jun 27;9(6):149-152. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v9.i6.149.
6
Long-term Impact of Bile Duct Injury on Morbidity, Mortality, Quality of Life, and Work Related Limitations.胆管损伤对发病率、死亡率、生活质量和工作相关限制的长期影响。
Ann Surg. 2018 Jul;268(1):143-150. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002258.
7
The morbidity and mortality of hepaticojejunostomies for complex bile duct injuries: a multi-institutional analysis of risk factors and outcomes using NSQIP.复杂胆管损伤行肝空肠吻合术的发病率和死亡率:一项使用美国国立外科质量改进计划(NSQIP)对危险因素和结局的多机构分析
HPB (Oxford). 2017 Apr;19(4):352-358. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2016.12.004. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
8
Prevention and acute management of biliary injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Expert consensus statement.腹腔镜胆囊切除术中胆道损伤的预防与急性处理:专家共识声明
Ulus Cerrahi Derg. 2016 Dec 1;32(4):300-305. doi: 10.5152/UCD.2016.3683. eCollection 2016.
9
Comparing early and delayed repair of common bile duct injury to identify clinical drivers of outcome and morbidity.比较胆总管损伤的早期修复和延迟修复,以确定影响预后和发病率的临床因素。
HPB (Oxford). 2016 Sep;18(9):718-25. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2016.06.016. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
10
Iatrogenic common bile duct injuries: Increasing complexity in the laparoscopic era: A prospective cohort study.医源性胆总管损伤:腹腔镜时代的复杂性日益增加:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2016 Sep;33 Pt A:151-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.08.004. Epub 2016 Aug 8.