Suppr超能文献

玻璃体视网膜手术联合视网膜下注射重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂治疗息肉样脉络膜血管病变的比较结果:同时进行抗血管内皮生长因子治疗的作用

Comparative outcomes of pars plana vitrectomy with subretinal rt-PA injection in polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy: the role of simultaneous anti-VEGF treatment.

作者信息

Chen Lulu, Wang Chuting, Zhang Wenfei, Meng Lihui, Sun Lu, Chen Youxin

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.

Key Laboratory of Ocular Fundus Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jul 3;12:1565507. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1565507. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed to assess the efficacy of simultaneous intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) with pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), subretinal recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA), and pneumatic tamponade in treating submacular hemorrhage (SMH) due to polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV), compared to the procedure without anti-VEGF.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed PCV patients with SMH who underwent the procedure at a tertiary hospital from 2021 to 2024. Outcomes comprised alterations in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), SMH absorption, and the administration of postoperative anti-VEGF injections.

RESULTS

A total of 31 patients were included in the study. There was no significant difference in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improvement or anti-VEGF usage between the anti-VEGF group and the control group. Both treatment strategies led to improved visual acuity. The mean number of anti-VEGF injections following surgery was 1.0 (8.0) in the anti-VEGF group and 1.0 (6.0) in the control group. Complications such as retinal detachment and recurrent vitreous hemorrhage occurred in both groups, with no significant difference between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Simultaneous intravitreal anti-VEGF did not outperform the procedure without it in terms of improved visual acuity or postoperative anti-VEGF usage. Further studies are needed to determine the best treatment approach for PCV patients with SMH.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估玻璃体腔注射抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)联合玻璃体切割术(PPV)、视网膜下注射重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(rt-PA)和气液填充治疗息肉样脉络膜血管病变(PCV)所致黄斑下出血(SMH)的疗效,并与未使用抗VEGF的手术方法进行比较。

方法

我们回顾性分析了2021年至2024年在一家三级医院接受该手术的PCV合并SMH患者。观察指标包括最佳矫正视力(BCVA)的变化、SMH的吸收情况以及术后抗VEGF注射的使用情况。

结果

本研究共纳入31例患者。抗VEGF组与对照组在最佳矫正视力(BCVA)改善或抗VEGF使用方面无显著差异。两种治疗策略均能提高视力。抗VEGF组术后抗VEGF注射的平均次数为1.0(8.0),对照组为1.0(6.0)。两组均发生视网膜脱离和复发性玻璃体出血等并发症,组间无显著差异。

结论

在提高视力或术后抗VEGF使用方面,玻璃体腔注射抗VEGF与未使用抗VEGF的手术方法相比并无优势。需要进一步研究以确定PCV合并SMH患者的最佳治疗方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f33/12267239/7df3a7bc8a53/fmed-12-1565507-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验