Private Retina Office, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Medical Investigation Institute "Alfredo Lanari", University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Eye (Lond). 2023 Jun;37(8):1659-1664. doi: 10.1038/s41433-022-02222-z. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
We aimed to compare visual and anatomical outcome in subretinal aflibercept vs. intravitreal aflibercept in the context of Pars Plana Vitrectomy (PPV), pneumatic displacement with subretinal air and subretinal tPA in patients with naïve submacular haemorrhage (SMH) secondary to neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).
Retrospective interventional cohort study.
80 patients treated with subretinal aflibercept vs. intravitreal aflibercept in the context of PPV, subretinal air and subretinal tPA in patients with SMH secondary to naïve nAMD.
Records were reviewed. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central subfoveal thickness (CST), and intraocular pressure (IOP) were recorded at baseline and 24 months after treatment.
BCVA, CST, and number of anti VEGF treatment over follow-up period.
The average duration from onset of symptoms to surgery was 1.26 days (range 0-3 days). Based on review of OCT images, SMH was subretinal in all 80 patients (100%), and sub-RPE in 29 patients (36.3%). Forty-one patients (51.25%) were treated with subretinal aflibercept ("subretinal group"), and 39 patients (48.75%) were treated with intravitreal aflibercept injections ("intravitreal group"). The groups were well balanced for age and gender p = 0.6588, and p = 0.263, respectively). Both groups showed statistically significant improvement in BCVA and CST (for all groups: p < 0.001). The mean number of anti VEGF given during follow-up period was statistically significantly lower in the "subretinal group" (p < 0.0001).
This study shows better management of the CNV, with a statistically significant lower need for anti-VEGF injections when treated with subretinal aflibercept compared to intravitreal application.
我们旨在比较单纯视网膜下阿柏西普与玻璃体内阿柏西普治疗初发年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)继发脉络膜新生血管(CNV)性黄斑下出血(SMH)患者行玻璃体切割术(PPV)、视网膜下气体填充联合视网膜下组织型纤溶酶原激活物(tPA)治疗后患者的视力和解剖学结局。
回顾性干预性队列研究。
80 例接受单纯视网膜下阿柏西普或玻璃体内阿柏西普联合 PPV、视网膜下气体填充联合视网膜下 tPA 治疗的初发 SMH 患者。
回顾病历资料,记录患者最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、中心视网膜下厚度(CST)和眼内压(IOP),并于治疗后 24 个月进行随访。
BCVA、CST 和随访期间抗 VEGF 治疗的次数。
从发病到手术的平均时间为 1.26 天(范围 0-3 天)。基于 OCT 图像分析,80 例患者(100%)SMH 均为单纯视网膜下出血,29 例(36.3%)合并视网膜色素上皮下出血。41 例(51.25%)患者接受单纯视网膜下阿柏西普治疗(“单纯视网膜下组”),39 例(48.75%)患者接受玻璃体内阿柏西普注射治疗(“玻璃体内组”)。两组患者在年龄和性别方面无统计学差异(p=0.6588,p=0.263)。两组患者 BCVA 和 CST 均有统计学显著改善(各组:p<0.001)。“单纯视网膜下组”抗 VEGF 治疗次数显著减少(p<0.0001)。
与玻璃体内应用相比,单纯视网膜下阿柏西普治疗可更好地控制 CNV,显著减少抗 VEGF 治疗次数。