• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人工智能中的人文关怀:通过自我决定理论和教师支架作用优化语言学习

The human touch in AI: optimizing language learning through self-determination theory and teacher scaffolding.

作者信息

Ma Yi, Chen Mingyang

机构信息

School of Humanities, Foshan University, Foshan, China.

International Education Institute, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 3;16:1568239. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1568239. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1568239
PMID:40678438
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12268064/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming language education, yet its long-term impact on motivation and proficiency, particularly how AI-driven gamification and teacher scaffolding interact in culturally distinct EFL contexts, remains underexplored. This study investigates the sustained influence of AI-powered language games on Chinese EFL learners' motivation, engagement, and English proficiency.

METHODS

This mixed-methods, longitudinal quasi-experimental study involved 150 intermediate Chinese EFL learners across three universities. Participants were stratified into three groups: AI with teacher scaffolding, AI only, and a control group using non-AI gamified platforms. Over 16 weeks, we collected quantitative data (IELTS Indicator tests, motivation and technology acceptance surveys) and qualitative data (interviews, observations, and reflective journals).

RESULTS

Quantitative analyses revealed that the AI with Scaffolding group achieved significantly greater and more sustained proficiency gains than both the AI Only and Control groups. Motivation was significantly mediated by the satisfaction of Self-Determination Theory needs. Qualitative findings highlighted teacher scaffolding's pivotal role in contextualizing AI feedback, mitigating algorithmic rigidity, and fostering a "novice-to-self-regulated learner" trajectory. Cultural factors significantly influenced technology acceptance.

DISCUSSION

Findings underscore that AI's potential in language learning is maximized when strategically integrated with human pedagogical expertise, which addresses AI's limitations related to cultural nuances, overcorrection, and trust. This study offers concrete practical implications for educators and institutions, advocating for a balanced, human-centered approach to AI integration in diverse EFL contexts.

摘要

引言

人工智能(AI)正在改变语言教育,但其对动机和熟练程度的长期影响,尤其是在文化背景不同的英语外语教学(EFL)环境中,人工智能驱动的游戏化与教师支架如何相互作用,仍未得到充分探索。本研究调查了人工智能驱动的语言游戏对中国英语外语学习者的动机、参与度和英语熟练程度的持续影响。

方法

这项混合方法的纵向准实验研究涉及三所大学的150名中级中国英语外语学习者。参与者被分为三组:人工智能与教师支架组、仅人工智能组和使用非人工智能游戏化平台的对照组。在16周的时间里,我们收集了定量数据(雅思指标测试、动机和技术接受度调查)和定性数据(访谈、观察和反思日志)。

结果

定量分析表明,人工智能与支架组在熟练程度提高方面比仅人工智能组和对照组都取得了显著更大且更持续的进步。动机在很大程度上由自我决定理论需求的满足所介导。定性研究结果强调了教师支架在将人工智能反馈情境化、减轻算法僵化以及促进“从新手到自我调节学习者”轨迹方面的关键作用。文化因素对技术接受度有显著影响。

讨论

研究结果强调,当与人类教学专业知识进行战略整合时,人工智能在语言学习中的潜力能得到最大发挥,这解决了人工智能在文化细微差别、过度纠正和信任方面的局限性。本研究为教育工作者和机构提供了具体的实践启示,倡导在不同的英语外语教学环境中采用平衡的、以人为本的人工智能整合方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a31/12268064/85b9319e905c/fpsyg-16-1568239-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a31/12268064/b053b8b0aef5/fpsyg-16-1568239-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a31/12268064/85b9319e905c/fpsyg-16-1568239-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a31/12268064/b053b8b0aef5/fpsyg-16-1568239-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a31/12268064/85b9319e905c/fpsyg-16-1568239-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The human touch in AI: optimizing language learning through self-determination theory and teacher scaffolding.人工智能中的人文关怀:通过自我决定理论和教师支架作用优化语言学习
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 3;16:1568239. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1568239. eCollection 2025.
2
Redefining Mentorship in Medical Education with Artificial Intelligence: A Delphi Study on the Feasibility and Implications.利用人工智能重新定义医学教育中的导师指导:关于可行性和影响的德尔菲研究
Teach Learn Med. 2025 Jun 18:1-11. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2025.2521001.
3
Effect of university teachers' teaching style on EFL learners' classroom engagement: the mediating role of self-efficacy.大学教师教学风格对英语外语学习者课堂参与度的影响:自我效能感的中介作用。
BMC Psychol. 2025 Jul 7;13(1):749. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-03069-1.
4
AI-generated corpus learning and EFL learners' learning of grammatical structures, lexical bundles, and willingness to write.人工智能生成的语料库学习与外语学习者对语法结构、词汇束的学习以及写作意愿
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 11;20(7):e0321544. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321544. eCollection 2025.
5
An activity theory-based exploration of "Eyeland", a task-based serious game for EFL visually impaired students.基于活动理论对“Eyeland”的探索,一款针对视障英语外语学习者的任务型严肃游戏。
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2025 Apr 23;11:e2631. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2631. eCollection 2025.
6
Accreditation through the eyes of nurse managers: an infinite staircase or a phenomenon that evaporates like water.护士长眼中的认证:是无尽的阶梯还是如流水般消逝的现象。
J Health Organ Manag. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2025-0029.
7
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
8
Perspectives of Health Care Professionals on the Use of AI to Support Clinical Decision-Making in the Management of Multiple Long-Term Conditions: Interview Study.医疗保健专业人员对使用人工智能支持多种慢性病管理中临床决策的看法:访谈研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jul 4;27:e71980. doi: 10.2196/71980.
9
AI for IMPACTS Framework for Evaluating the Long-Term Real-World Impacts of AI-Powered Clinician Tools: Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.用于评估人工智能驱动的临床医生工具长期现实世界影响的AI for IMPACTS框架:系统评价与叙述性综合分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Feb 5;27:e67485. doi: 10.2196/67485.
10
The role of social comparison in online learning motivation through the lens of social comparison theory.从社会比较理论视角看社会比较在在线学习动机中的作用。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2025 Aug;258:105291. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105291. Epub 2025 Jul 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Artificial intelligence in language instruction: impact on English learning achievement, L2 motivation, and self-regulated learning.语言教学中的人工智能:对英语学习成绩、二语学习动机和自主学习的影响。
Front Psychol. 2023 Nov 6;14:1261955. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1261955. eCollection 2023.
2
Editorial: Using artificial intelligence technology for language learning.社论:利用人工智能技术进行语言学习。
Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 20;14:1287667. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1287667. eCollection 2023.
3
The Roles of Cultural Capital in Teacher-Student Interactions in China: A Qualitative Study of Students in Higher Vocational Colleges.
文化资本在中国师生互动中的作用:对高职院校学生的定性研究
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Aug 19;13(8):690. doi: 10.3390/bs13080690.
4
Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in education.教育领域人工智能的伦理原则。
Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). 2023;28(4):4221-4241. doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11316-w. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
5
What makes students engaged in learning? A time-use study of within- and between-individual predictors of emotional engagement in low-performing high schools.是什么让学生投入学习?一项对低绩效高中个体内和个体间情绪投入的预测因素的时间使用研究。
J Youth Adolesc. 2012 Mar;41(3):390-401. doi: 10.1007/s10964-011-9738-3. Epub 2011 Dec 23.
6
Long and short measures of flow: the construct validity of the FSS-2, DFS-2, and new brief counterparts.流量的长短测量:FSS - 2、DFS - 2及新简短版本的结构效度
J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2008 Oct;30(5):561-87. doi: 10.1123/jsep.30.5.561.
7
Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions.内在动机与外在动机:经典定义与新方向
Contemp Educ Psychol. 2000 Jan;25(1):54-67. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1020.
8
A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation.一项关于研究外部奖励对内在动机影响的实验的元分析综述。
Psychol Bull. 1999 Nov;125(6):627-68; discussion 692-700. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.627.