Suppr超能文献

小儿计算机断层扫描期间经鼻途径镇静的适宜性和安全性:在科勒-布教学医院进行的一项随机对照试验。

Appropriateness and safety of using the intranasal route for sedation during pediatric computed tomography: A randomized controlled trial at Korle-Bu teaching hospital.

作者信息

Annan Beauty Naa Yarley, Owusu Darkwa Ebenezer, Anno Audrey, Vanderpuye Naa Matekour, Baffour-Awuah Lorraine, Obeng Adjei Grace-Imelda, Danso Owusu-Sekyere, Essuman Raymond, Aryee George, Djagbletey Robert

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital, Ghana.

Department of Anaesthesia, University of Ghana Medical School, Ghana.

出版信息

J Int Med Res. 2025 Jul;53(7):3000605251357455. doi: 10.1177/03000605251357455. Epub 2025 Jul 18.

Abstract

ObjectiveThis study aimed to determine the effectiveness and safety of using intranasal ketamine, midazolam, or their combination for sedation during pediatric computed tomography.MethodIn this randomized, double-blind study, 60 children aged ≤2.5 years who were scheduled to undergo computed tomography were allocated into the following three groups: Group K (ketamine 10 mg/kg), Group M (midazolam 0.2 mg/kg), and Group C (ketamine 7.5 mg/kg + midazolam 0.1 mg/kg). In all cases, the drugs were administered intranasally. Sedation parameters were assessed.ResultOf the 60 randomized participants, 10 were excluded due to failed sedation. Data from 16 (Group M), 14 (Group K), and 20 (Group C) participants were analyzed. The mean sedation scores were similar: Groups K (2.86 ± 0.38), M (2.63 ± 0.74), and C (2.70 ± 0.68) (p = 0.579). Time to adequate sedation was shortest in Group C (22 ± 9 min; p = 0.022). Recovery was fastest in Group M (63 ± 25 min; p = 0.007). Discharge times differed significantly (p = 0.036) among the groups, with Group M exhibiting a discharge time of 92 ± 29 min. Group C had superior parental separation scores compared with the other groups (p = 0.035).ConclusionIntranasal administration of ketamine, midazolam, or their combination is safe and effective for inducing sedation during computed tomography in pediatric patients with minimal side effects.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定在儿科计算机断层扫描期间使用鼻内氯胺酮、咪达唑仑或其组合进行镇静的有效性和安全性。

方法

在这项随机、双盲研究中,将60名年龄≤2.5岁且计划接受计算机断层扫描的儿童分为以下三组:K组(氯胺酮10mg/kg)、M组(咪达唑仑0.2mg/kg)和C组(氯胺酮7.5mg/kg + 咪达唑仑0.1mg/kg)。在所有情况下,药物均通过鼻内给药。评估镇静参数。

结果

在60名随机参与者中,10名因镇静失败而被排除。分析了16名(M组)、14名(K组)和20名(C组)参与者的数据。平均镇静评分相似:K组(2.86±0.38)、M组(2.63±0.74)和C组(2.70±0.68)(p = 0.579)。C组达到充分镇静的时间最短(22±9分钟;p = 0.022)。M组恢复最快(63±25分钟;p = 0.007)。各组间出院时间差异显著(p = 0.036),M组出院时间为92±29分钟。C组的家长分离评分优于其他组(p = 0.035)。

结论

对于儿科患者在计算机断层扫描期间诱导镇静,鼻内给予氯胺酮、咪达唑仑或其组合是安全有效的,且副作用最小。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5110/12276492/7ab93cbad5e7/10.1177_03000605251357455-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验